Identification of the dominant hydrological process and appropriate model structure of a karst catchment through stepwise simplification of a complex conceptual model

Abstract Conceptual models often suffer from the over-parameterization problem due to limited available data for the calibration. This leads to the problem of parameter nonuniqueness and equifinality, which may bring much uncertainty of the simulation result. How to find out the appropriate model structure supported by the available data to simulate the catchment is still a big challenge in the hydrological research. In this paper, we adopt a multi-model framework to identify the dominant hydrological process and appropriate model structure of a karst spring, located in Guilin city, China. For this catchment, the spring discharge is the only available data for the model calibration. This framework starts with a relative complex conceptual model according to the perception of the catchment and then this complex is simplified into several different models by gradually removing the model component. The multi-objective approach is used to compare the performance of these different models and the regional sensitivity analysis (RSA) is used to investigate the parameter identifiability. The results show this karst spring is mainly controlled by two different hydrological processes and one of the processes is threshold-driven which is consistent with the fieldwork investigation. However, the appropriate model structure to simulate the discharge of this spring is much simpler than the actual aquifer structure and hydrological processes understanding from the fieldwork investigation. A simple linear reservoir with two different outlets is enough to simulate this spring discharge. The detail runoff process in the catchment is not needed in the conceptual model to simulate the spring discharge. More complex model should need more other additional data to avoid serious deterioration of model predictions.

[1]  Zhao Chen,et al.  A new approach to evaluate spatiotemporal dynamics of controlling parameters in distributed environmental models , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Learning from model improvement: On the contribution of complementary data to process understanding , 2008 .

[3]  P. Williams.  The role of the epikarst in karst and cave hydrogeology: a review , 2008 .

[4]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Improving model structure and reducing parameter uncertainty in conceptual water balance models through the use of auxiliary data , 2005 .

[5]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[6]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[7]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Sensitivity analyses of a distributed catchment model to verify the model structure , 2005 .

[8]  H. Jourde,et al.  Modelling the hydrologic functions of a karst aquifer under active water management – The Lez spring , 2009 .

[9]  P. Willems,et al.  Adopting the downward approach in hydrological model development: the Bradford catchment case study , 2011 .

[10]  Bruce A. Robinson,et al.  Self-Adaptive Multimethod Search for Global Optimization in Real-Parameter Spaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Hydrological field data from a modeller's perspective: Part 2: process‐based evaluation of model hypotheses , 2011 .

[12]  C. Perrin,et al.  Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments , 2001 .

[13]  Jichun Wu,et al.  Modeling the hydrological behavior of a karst spring using a nonlinear reservoir-pipe model , 2015, Hydrogeology Journal.

[14]  Nico Goldscheider,et al.  Methods in karst hydrogeology , 2007 .

[15]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Catchment properties, function, and conceptual model representation: is there a correspondence? , 2014 .

[16]  Damir Jukić,et al.  Groundwater balance estimation in karst by using a conceptual rainfall-runoff model , 2009 .

[17]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 2. Application and experimental insights , 2011 .

[18]  A. Mangin.  Contribution à l'étude hydrodynamique des aquifères karstiques , 1975 .

[19]  P. Perrochet,et al.  Effect of the epikarst on the hydrograph of karst springs : a numerical approach , 1995 .

[20]  Francesca Pianosi,et al.  A Matlab toolbox for Global Sensitivity Analysis , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  K. Beven,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Uncertainty in Runoff Prediction and the Value of Data: An Application of the GLUE Approach , 1996 .

[22]  P. Reed,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions Comparing Sensitivity Analysis Methods to Advance Lumped Watershed Model Identification and Evaluation , 2022 .

[23]  K. Beven,et al.  Shenandoah Watershed Study: Calibration of a Topography‐Based, Variable Contributing Area Hydrological Model to a Small Forested Catchment , 1985 .

[24]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Performance of conceptual rainfall‐runoff models in low‐yielding ephemeral catchments , 1997 .

[25]  Martyn P. Clark,et al.  Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models , 2008 .

[26]  James C. I. Dooge,et al.  Bringing it all together , 2004 .

[27]  J. R. Eagleman,et al.  Pan Evaporation, Potential and Actual Evapotranspiration , 1967 .

[28]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Process-based karst modelling to relate hydrodynamic and hydrochemical characteristics to system properties , 2013 .

[29]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  The influence of conceptual model structure on model performance: a comparative study for 237 French catchments , 2013 .

[30]  D. Ford,et al.  Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology , 2007 .

[31]  H. Kunstmann,et al.  A multi-model approach for improved simulations of future water availability at a large Eastern Mediterranean karst spring , 2012 .

[32]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Downward approach to hydrological prediction , 2003 .

[33]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Model complexity control for hydrologic prediction , 2008 .

[34]  Neil McIntyre,et al.  Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall‐runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis , 2003 .

[35]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  A framework for development and application of hydrological models , 2001, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[36]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[37]  G. Blöschl,et al.  Downward approach to hydrological prediction , 2003 .

[38]  Michel Bakalowicz,et al.  Modelling of the functioning of karst aquifers with a reservoir model: Application to Fontaine de Vaucluse (South of France) , 2007 .

[39]  P. Reed,et al.  Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient , 2008 .

[40]  Jasper A Vrugt,et al.  Improved evolutionary optimization from genetically adaptive multimethod search , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  P. Matgen,et al.  Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement , 2008 .

[42]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development , 2001 .

[43]  Dmitri Kavetski,et al.  Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling , 2011 .

[44]  Ming Ye,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications , 2015 .

[45]  J. Vrugt,et al.  Comparison of Three Multiobjective Optimization Algorithms for Inverse Modeling of Vadose Zone Hydraulic Properties , 2008 .

[46]  Bart Nijssen,et al.  Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of land surface parameters using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model , 2007 .

[47]  Peter C. Young,et al.  Top‐down and data‐based mechanistic modelling of rainfall–flow dynamics at the catchment scale , 2003 .

[48]  A. Jakeman,et al.  How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model? , 1993 .

[49]  K. Beven,et al.  Progress and directions in rainfall-runoff modelling , 1993 .

[50]  Markus Weiler,et al.  Identification of a karst system’s intrinsic hydrodynamic parameters: upscaling from single springs to the whole aquifer , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[51]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Toward improved identification of hydrological models: A diagnostic evaluation of the “abcd” monthly water balance model for the conterminous United States , 2010 .

[52]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review , 2010 .

[53]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Is the groundwater reservoir linear? Learning from data in hydrological modelling , 2005 .

[54]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[55]  M. Weiler,et al.  Progress in the hydrologic simulation of time variant recharge areas of karst systems – exemplified at a karst spring in Southern Spain , 2013 .

[56]  A. Montanari,et al.  Investigation of dominant hydrological processes in a tropical catchment in a monsoonal climate via the downward approach , 2006 .

[57]  Jim Freer,et al.  Ensemble evaluation of hydrological model hypotheses , 2010 .

[58]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  A comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modeling , 2007 .

[59]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Temporal dynamics of model parameter sensitivity for computationally expensive models with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test , 2011 .

[60]  George Kuczera,et al.  Assessment of hydrologic parameter uncertainty and the worth of multiresponse data , 1998 .

[61]  A. Mangin,et al.  A multi-objective calibration framework for rainfall–discharge models applied to karst systems , 2011 .

[62]  T. Mathevet,et al.  Confronting surface‐ and groundwater balances on the La Rochefoucauld‐Touvre karstic system (Charente, France) , 2008 .

[63]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. , 2000 .

[64]  M. B. Beck,et al.  The identification of conceptual hydrological models for surface water acidification , 1986 .

[65]  Vincent Guinot,et al.  Modelling the behaviour of a karst system catchment using non-linear hysteretic conceptual model , 2011 .