Testing Resource-Based and Industry Factors in a Multi-Level Model of Competitive Advantage Creation

ABSTRACT This study examined an integrative, multi-level conceptual framework incorporating manufacturing facility practices and performance, factors influencing industry rivalry, and firmlevel creation of economic value in order to partially explain the creation of competitive advantage. Additionally, this article supports work establishing environmental practices and performance as a strategic factor in manufacturing. Data from a cross-sectional sample of 250 corporations with 1762 manufacturing facilities in four industries are analyzed in a structural model. The study results indicate: (1) strategic environmental asset productivity within manufacturing facilities contributes to firm-level value creation; (2) complementary environmental assets within manufacturing facilities strengthen the relationship between asset productivity and firm-level value creation; (3) firm-level value creation mediates the relationship between manufacturing facility asset productivity and a competitive advantage; and (4) firms competing within industries with greater numbers of competitors experience a stronger relationship between firm-level value creation anda competitive advantage. This paper supports the role of the resource-based construct of value creation as a mediating factor between intra-firm productivity and inter-firm competitive advantage creation and the need to further develop a multi-level, resource-based model. INTRODUCTION The development of the resource-based view (RBV) of competitive advantage (Barney 1 99 1) is seen by many management researchers as having the potential to become a theory -based successor to contingency /fit models of strategy if integrated with industry level frameworks (Conner 1991; Helfat & Lieberman, 2002; Levinthal & Myatt, 1994) and intrafirm models of strategy formulation and implementation (Govindarajan and Fisher, 1990; Ramanujam & Wiersema, 1986). However, as outlined by Priem and Butler (2001) and supplemented by Barney (2001), much work still needs to be done before the full theoretical contributions and limitations of the RBV are demonstrated. In particular, efforts to operationalize and test resource-based concepts have tended to draw direct linkages between internal strategic assets and market outcomes (McGrath, MacMillan & Venkatraman 1995) and treated strategic industry factors as influences to be controlled rather than integrated into a multi -level model. Following in the steps of management research attempting to employ both firm-based and industry -based factors (Hawawini, Subramanian, & Verdin, 2003), this study attempts to make four contributions to research related to broadening the RBV as a multi-level model of competitive advantage creation. The first is to add to the understanding of RBV relationships by testing the effect of value creation as a mediator between important strategic assets and a firm's financial performance relative to its competitors. The mediating role of value creation derived from strategic asset deployment or implementation should help to explain why control of strategic assets does not necessarily directly result in the creation of a competitive advantage (Collis, 1994). A second contribution is to test the moderating effect and importance of complementary assets on the relationship between strategic environmental assets and their value-creating efficacy (VicenteLorente, 2001). This should help explain the role of complementary assets that interact with existing strategic assets to produce value for the firm (Barney, 1991). The third contribution of this paper is the testing of the influence of complementary environmental asset rareness within our multi-level model. Few, if any, tests of asset rareness have been explored and this is a key industry-level element of the RBV (Priem and Butler, 2001). Finally, prior studies have demonstrated firm-level resource influence on environmental performance (e.g., pollution abatement investments) and competitive advantage (Sharma and Vredenburg, 1998) and industry -level factors on the contribution of a firm' s environmental reputation to competitive advantage. …

[1]  K. Boal,et al.  Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage , 2007 .

[2]  M. Russo,et al.  Organizational Design and Environmental Performance: Clues From the Electronics Industry , 2005 .

[3]  P. Bansal Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development , 2005 .

[4]  R. A. Wiggins,et al.  Evidence on Value Creation in the Financial Services Industries through the Use of Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances , 2003 .

[5]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  Pricing process as a capability: a resource-based perspective , 2003 .

[6]  Paul J. Verdin,et al.  IS PERFORMANCE DRIVEN BY INDUSTRY- OR FIRM-SPECIFIC FACTORS? A NEW LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE , 2009 .

[7]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history , 2002 .

[8]  J. Barney Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[9]  T. C. Powell Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations , 2001 .

[10]  Richard Makadok Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[11]  José David Vicente-Lorente,et al.  Specificity and opacity as resource‐based determinants of capital structure: evidence for Spanish manufacturing firms , 2001 .

[12]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[13]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance , 2001 .

[14]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[15]  Petra Christmann Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[16]  Michael J. Lenox,et al.  Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program , 2000 .

[17]  Thomas J. Dean,et al.  Stepping Towards Sustainable Business: An Evaluation of Waste Minimization Practices in US Manufacturing , 2000, Interfaces.

[18]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[19]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[20]  Candace E Young-Ybarra,et al.  Strategic Flexibility in Information Technology Alliances: the Influence of Transaction Cost Economics and Social Exchange Theory , 1999 .

[21]  J. Aragón-Correa Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment , 1998 .

[22]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[23]  Alfredo J. Mauri,et al.  Firm and industry effects within strategic management: an empirical examination , 1998 .

[24]  S. Sengupta,et al.  Impact of Strategic Alliances on Firm Valuation , 1998 .

[25]  Arthur J. Keown,et al.  Do strategic alliances create value , 1997 .

[26]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[27]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[28]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[29]  K. Provan,et al.  An Emergent Theory of Structure and Outcomes in Small-Firm Strategic Manufacturing Networks , 1997 .

[30]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER , REALLY ? , 1997 .

[31]  Chad Nehrt,et al.  TIMING AND INTENSITY EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTMENTS , 1996 .

[32]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm in Two Environments: The Hollywood Film Studios From 1936 to 1965 , 1996 .

[33]  J. Barney Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[34]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[35]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[36]  J. Robins,et al.  A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance , 1995 .

[37]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Defining and developing competence: A strategic process paradigm , 1995 .

[38]  T. C. Powell Total Quality Management as Competitive Advantage , 1995 .

[39]  Paul C. Godfrey,et al.  THE PROBLEM OF UNOBSERVABLES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 1995 .

[40]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  An Evolutionary Model of Organizational Performance , 1994 .

[41]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Co-Evolution of Capabilities and Industry: The Evolution of Mutual Fund Processing , 1994 .

[43]  Randall L. Schultz,et al.  IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIC MISSIONS: EFFECTIVE STRATEGIC, STRUCTURAL AND TACTICAL CHOICES , 1994 .

[44]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management Research , 1994 .

[45]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[46]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[47]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[48]  David Lei,et al.  Global Strategy, Competence-Building and Strategic Alliances , 1992 .

[49]  Energy and Materials Program,et al.  Green Products by Design: Choices for a Cleaner Environment , 1992 .

[50]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[51]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[52]  R. Rumelt How much does industry matter , 1991 .

[53]  K. R. Conner A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[54]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  Strategy, Control Systems, and Resource Sharing: Effects on Business-Unit Performance , 1990 .

[55]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[56]  Karel Cool,et al.  Business strategy, market structure and risk-return relationships: a structural approach , 1989 .

[57]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF ECONOMIC AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS , 1989 .

[58]  Michael Hergert,et al.  Accounting data for value chain analysis , 1989 .

[59]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis : The effect of sample size , 1988 .

[60]  K. R. Harrigan Joint ventures and competitive strategy , 1988 .

[61]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Collusion versus Differential Efficiency: Testing Alternative Hypotheses , 1987 .

[62]  Vasudevan Ramanujam,et al.  Multi-Objective Assessment of Effectiveness of Strategic Planning: A Discriminant Analysis Approach , 1986 .

[63]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[64]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  On corporate governance: A study of proxy contests , 1983 .

[65]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[66]  B. Hako Strategies for diversification , 1972 .

[67]  C. F. Phillips Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[68]  S. Hart,et al.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .