Looking into your eyes: observed pupil size influences approach-avoidance responses

ABSTRACT The eyes reveal important social messages, such as emotions and whether a person is aroused and interested or bored and fatigued. A growing body of research has also shown that individuals with large pupils are generally evaluated positively by observers, while those with small pupils are perceived negatively. Here, we examined whether observed pupil size influences approach-avoidance tendencies. Participants performed an Approach-Avoidance Task using faces with large and small pupil sizes. Results showed that pupil size influences the accuracy of arm movements. Specifically, individuals were less prone to approach a face with small pupils than a face with large pupils. Conversely, participants were less prone to avoid a face with large pupils than a face with small pupils. Collectively, these findings suggest that perceivers attend to a facial cue – pupil size – when interacting with others.

[1]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Consequences of Automatic Evaluation: Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus , 1999 .

[2]  Andreas B. Eder,et al.  When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  Mary Ann Collins,et al.  Accurate Social Perception at Zero Acquaintance: The Affordances of a Gibsonian Approach , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[4]  Peter Mende-Siedlecki,et al.  Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  C. Macrae,et al.  A boy primed Sue: feature‐based processing and person construal , 2007 .

[6]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[7]  E. Hess ATTITUDE AND PUPIL SIZE. , 1965, Scientific American.

[8]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  People as Flexible Interpreters: Evidence and Issues from Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1996 .

[9]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Melissa A. Wheeler,et al.  A meta-analysis of the facilitation of arm flexion and extension movements as a function of stimulus valence , 2015, Cognition & emotion.

[11]  Skyler T. Hawk,et al.  Moving faces, looking places: validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES). , 2011, Emotion.

[12]  H. Critchley,et al.  Processing of observed pupil size modulates perception of sadness and predicts empathy. , 2007, Emotion.

[13]  Luigi Castelli,et al.  On the Immediate Consequences of Intergroup Categorization: Activation of Approach and Avoidance Motor Behavior Toward Ingroup and Outgroup Members , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[14]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size as Related to Interest Value of Visual Stimuli , 1960, Science.

[15]  Daniel B Wright,et al.  Age Differences in Lineup Identification Accuracy: People Are Better with Their Own Age , 2002, Law and human behavior.

[16]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Pupil Mimicry Correlates With Trust in In-Group Partners With Dilating Pupils , 2015, Psychological science.

[18]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Pupillary changes in two memory tasks , 1966 .

[19]  R. H. Phaf,et al.  Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[20]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Eye contact detection in humans from birth , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  S. Sirois,et al.  Pupillometry , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[22]  N. Ambady,et al.  EMbOdiEd iMPrESSiON fOrMaTiON: SOCial JudgMENTS aNd MOTOr CuES TO aPPrOaCh aNd avOidaNCE , 2012 .

[23]  J. Richeson,et al.  On the categorization of admired and disliked exemplars of admired and disliked racial groups. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Frank Baeyens,et al.  On the generality of the affective Simon effect , 2001 .

[25]  C. Macrae,et al.  Social cognition: thinking categorically about others. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  M. Braga,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[27]  M. Kret Emotional expressions beyond facial muscle actions. A call for studying autonomic signals and their impact on social perception , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[28]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Pupil-mimicry conditions trust in partners: moderation by oxytocin and group membership , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  M. Just,et al.  The intensity dimension of thought: pupillometric indices of sentence processing. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[30]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[31]  A. Elliot The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation , 2006 .

[32]  M. Kret,et al.  Connecting minds and sharing emotions through mimicry: A neurocognitive model of emotional contagion , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[33]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Reading Faces: Window To The Soul? , 2019 .

[34]  M. Kret,et al.  Pupil to pupil: The effect of a partner's pupil size on (dis)honest behavior , 2018 .