Effects of Interspersed Brief Problems on Students' Endurance at Completing Math Work

An alternating treatments design was used to compare the effects of baseline, interspersed brief problems, and interspersed brief problems plus token reinforcement on students' endurance while completing math worksheets. By pairing the completion of brief problems with token reinforcement, the role of problem completion as a conditioned reinforcer was examined consistent with the discrete task completion hypothesis. Four 5th grade students who were low achieving in math participated. Each day the students completed a stack of math worksheets containing 3-digit by 3-digit addition problems with or without interspersed single-digit problems for 10 min. Dependent measures included total digits correct per session and during each min of the 10 min work period (i.e., a measure of endurance). Results indicated that total digits correct per session was highest during the interspersal plus reinforcement condition followed by interspersal and then baseline for three of the four students. In addition, both interspersal conditions resulted in greater endurance than baseline. Limitations of the current study and implications for increasing students' persistence on classroom tasks are discussed.

[1]  L. Kern,et al.  Modifying Instructional Activities to Promote Desirable Behavior: A Conceptual and Practical Framework , 1996 .

[2]  C. Skinner,et al.  Altering Response Topography to Increase Response Efficiency and Learning Rates. , 1997 .

[3]  Assessing Teachers' and Students' Preferences for School-Based Reinforcers: Agreement Across Methods and Different Effort Requirements , 2001 .

[4]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[5]  C. Skinner,et al.  Increasing On-Task Behavior in an Elementary Student During Mathematics Seatwork by Interspersing Additional Brief Problems , 2001 .

[6]  C. Skinner,et al.  Enhancing Perceptions of Mathematics Assignments by Increasing Relative Problem Completion Rates through the Interspersal Technique. , 1999 .

[7]  T. Vollmer,et al.  A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. , 1996, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  B. Martens,et al.  Competence, persistence, and success: The positive psychology of behavioral skill instruction , 2004 .

[9]  C. Binder Behavioral Fluency: Evolution of a New Paradigm , 1996, The Behavior analyst.

[10]  S. Ball Motivation in Education , 1977 .

[11]  C. Skinner,et al.  An empirical analysis of interspersal research evidence, implications and applications of the discrete task completion hypothesis. , 2002 .

[12]  G. Dunlap,et al.  Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  B. Martens,et al.  A Brief Experimental Analysis For Identifying Instructional Components Needed To Improve Oral Reading Fluency. , 1999 .

[14]  G. Dunlap,et al.  Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps. , 1990, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  N. Feather,et al.  BRIEF ARTICLES EFFECTS OF AMOUNT OF PRIOR SUCCESS AND FAILURE ON EXPECTATIONS OF SUCCESS AND SUBSEQUENT TASK PERFORMANCE , 1967 .

[16]  C. Skinner,et al.  Getting remedial mathematics students to prefer homework with 20% and 40% more problems : An investigation of the strength of the interspersing procedure , 2000 .

[17]  C. Skinner,et al.  Increasing on-task behavior during mathematics independent seat-work in students with emotional disturbance by interspersing additional brief problems , 2002 .

[18]  Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink,et al.  Motivation as an Enabler for Academic Success , 2002 .

[19]  R. Gaylord-Ross,et al.  Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students. , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  Edward E. Gickling,et al.  Levels of Instructional Difficulty as Related to On-Task Behavior, Task Completion, and Comprehension , 1978 .

[21]  Mark R. Shinn,et al.  Curriculum-Based Measurement: Assessing Special Children , 1989 .

[22]  K R Johnson,et al.  On Terms and Procedures: Fluency , 1996, The Behavior analyst.

[23]  Phyllis K. Mirkin,et al.  Data-Based Program Modification: A Manual. , 1977 .

[24]  Carl Binder,et al.  Increasing Endurance by Building Fluency: Precision Teaching Attention Span , 1990 .

[25]  Gregg A. Johns,et al.  Applying Herrnstein's Matching Law to Influence Students' Choice to Complete Difficult Academic Tasks , 1996 .

[26]  P. Alberto,et al.  Applied behavior analysis for teachers , 1982 .

[27]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[28]  M. Shinn,et al.  Differentiating Mildly Handicapped, Low-Achieving, and Regular Education Students , 1985 .

[29]  C. Skinner,et al.  Improving students' perceptions of a mathematics assignment by increasing problem completion rates: Is problem completion a reinforcing event? , 1998 .