Diagnostic Informatics: Its Role in Enhancing Clinical Excellence, Patient Safety and the Value of Care

Diagnostic informatics encompasses the role of information technology in key areas of the diagnostic testing (pathology and medical imaging) process, including the selection of appropriate tests and interpretation and follow-up of test results. We present three case studies employing diagnostic informatics methodologies to demonstrate their potential use and value in health services research: (1) Data analytics applied to diagnostic data linked with patient outcome data as a means of enhanancing the monitoring of the quality and appropriateness of diagnostic test choices; (2) Business process modelling which can help to highlight healthcare processes in the diagnostic pathway as a means of improving safety and performance, and (3) Consumer involvement in the diagnostic research process to assist in the establishment of person-centred test result management systems. The case studies provide evidence of the role that diagnostic informatics can have in improving the quality and safety of patient care.

[1]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[2]  Diagnostic error. , 1961, American practitioner and digest of treatment.

[3]  Matthew L. Rubinstein,et al.  Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization , 2018, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  David W Bates,et al.  Communicating critical test results: safe practice recommendations. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[5]  Benedetto Intrigila,et al.  A BPMN-Based Automated Approach for the Analysis of Healthcare Processes , 2016, 2016 IEEE 25th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE).

[6]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[7]  J. Westbrook,et al.  Patient groups, clinicians and healthcare professionals agree – all test results need to be seen, understood and followed up , 2018, Diagnosis.

[8]  Clayon B Hamilton,et al.  What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams? , 2018, Journal of health services research & policy.

[9]  Manuel Campos,et al.  BPMN-Based Representation and Comparison of Clinical Pathways for Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Healthcare Informatics.

[10]  R. Forsman,et al.  Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations? , 1996, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety. , 2018, Health affairs.

[12]  Ling Li,et al.  What is the effect of electronic pathology ordering on test re-ordering patterns for paediatric patients? , 2014, HIC.

[13]  Christopher L. Roy,et al.  Patient Safety Concerns Arising from Test Results That Return after Hospital Discharge , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  What is the impact of an electronic test result acknowledgement system on Emergency Department physicians' work processes? A mixed-method pre-post observational study , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Alan R. Shuldiner,et al.  Using Workflow Modeling to Identify Areas to Improve Genetic Test Processes in the University of Maryland Translational Pharmacogenomics Project , 2015, AMIA.

[16]  Chris R. Chatwin,et al.  A Service Oriented Approach for Guidelines-based Clinical Decision Support using BPMN , 2014, MIE.