Effect of ligand volume correction on PMF scoring

Recently, a knowledge‐based scoring function has been introduced that estimates the protein‐binding affinity based on the 3D structure of a protein–ligand complex (J Med Chem 1999, 42, 791). A ligand volume correction factor has been proposed and applied to filter out intraligand interactions in this simplified potential approach. Here we evaluate the effect of the ligand volume correction on the predictive power of the PMF scoring function. It is found that the effect of the ligand volume correction is significant on the derived potentials and large on the overall score. However, the effect of the ligand correction on the predictive power of the scoring function appears to be smaller. For a test set containing serine proteases the predictive power of the PMF scoring function does not change with the introduction of the volume correction. For a test set of metalloprotease complexes, the predictive power of the PMF scoring function improves only slightly when the volume correction is applied. For five test sets comprising a total of 225 diverse protein ligand complexes taken from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank it is found, however, that the introduction of the ligand volume correction consistently improves the correlation between the PMF scores and the measured binding affinities. The effect of the correction factor on docking/scoring experiments is also analyzed using a test set of 61 biphenyl inhibitor‐stromelysin complexes. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Comput Chem 22: 418–425, 2001

[1]  Luhua Lai,et al.  SCORE: A New Empirical Method for Estimating the Binding Affinity of a Protein-Ligand Complex , 1998 .

[2]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[3]  A. Ben-Naim STATISTICAL POTENTIALS EXTRACTED FROM PROTEIN STRUCTURES : ARE THESE MEANINGFUL POTENTIALS? , 1997 .

[4]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  SMoG: de Novo Design Method Based on Simple, Fast, and Accurate Free Energy Estimates. 1. Methodology and Supporting Evidence , 1996 .

[5]  Y. Martin,et al.  A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  K. Dill,et al.  Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  P. Mark Rodger,et al.  Effect of available volumes on radial distribution functions , 1998 .

[8]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Empirical free energy calculations of ligand-protein crystallographic complexes. I. Knowledge-based ligand-protein interaction potentials applied to the prediction of human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease binding affinity. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[9]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  BLEEP—potential of mean force describing protein–ligand interactions: II. Calculation of binding energies and comparison with experimental data , 1999 .

[10]  Ingo Muegge,et al.  Evaluation of docking/scoring approaches: A comparative study based on MMP3 inhibitors , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[11]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[12]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[13]  R L Jernigan,et al.  A preference‐based free‐energy parameterization of enzyme‐inhibitor binding. Applications to HIV‐1‐protease inhibitor design , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: A fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[15]  Janet M. Thornton,et al.  BLEEP—potential of mean force describing protein–ligand interactions: I. Generating potential , 1999 .

[16]  G. Klebe,et al.  Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  P. Hajduk,et al.  Evaluation of PMF scoring in docking weak ligands to the FK506 binding protein. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.