•Artificial nests have become an important ool for avian ecologists. Results obtained with artificial nests are sometimes used to predict success of natural nests or to characterize spatio-temporal changes in success of natural nests, but only rarely is success of artificial and natural nests actually compared. We found no correlation between success of natural and artificial duck nests in the same year, nor did artificial nests accurately portray between-year changes in survival of natural nests. Furthermore, despite xtensive xperience working with natural duck nests, we were unable to place artificial nests in locations that matched vegetative characteristics of natural nest sites. Natural nests had denser, taller vegetation than artificial ones. Overhead concealment was greater at successful natural nests, but no difference was found with artificial nests. Researchers should be cautious when using artificial nests to predict natural nest success and should be aware of possible differences in vegetative features that may affect nest survival. CARACTERiSTICAS DE LA COVERTURA Y •XITO DE NIDOS NATURALES Y ARTIFICIALES DE PATOS Sinopsis.--Los nidos artificiales se han convertido en una importante herramienta de trabajo para los ec61ogos. Los resultados obtenidos en el estudio de nidos artificiales en ocasiones se utilizan para predecir el 6xito de nidos naturales o para caracterizar los cambios espaciotemporales en el 6xito de nidos naturales. No obstante, raras veces el 6xito de nidos artificiales es comparado al de nidos naturales. No encontramos correlacitn entre el 6xito de nidos naturales y artificiales de paros durante un mismo afio. Tampoco los nidos artificiales resultan ser una imagen de exactitud, entre aftos, de la sobrevivencia de los nidos naturales. Mils afn, no empece a la gran experiencia de trabajar con nidos naturales, no fuimos capaces de colocar un nido artificial en una localidad que pareara con las caracterlsticas de la vegetacitn de nidos naturales. Los nidos naturales tienen vegetacitn mils densa, y de mayor altura que los artificiales. Los nidos con mayor cantidad e vegetacitn, cubriendo la parte superior de estos, resultaron ser los nidos naturales mils exitosos; no se encontr6 diferencia entre nidos artificiales. Los investigadores deben ser mils cuidadosos cuando usen los resultados de nidos artificiales para predecir el 6xito de nidos naturales. Ademis, deben estar concientes que diferencias en las peculiaridades de la vegetaci6n pudieran afectar la supervivencia de los nidos. Artificial nests have become an important tool for avian ecologists because difficulties frequently arise when studying natural nests (e.g., small
[1]
J. Crawford,et al.
Relationships of habitat structure to nest success of ring-necked pheasants
,
1987
.
[2]
M. W. Weller.
A Simple Field Candler for Waterfowl Eggs
,
1956
.
[3]
Lynn M. Schriml,et al.
A CAMERA STUDY OF TEMPORAL PATTERNS OF NEST PREDATION IN DIFFERENT HABITATS
,
1994
.
[4]
T. Storaas.
A Comparison of Losses in Artificial and Naturally Occurring Capercaillie Nests
,
1988
.
[5]
K. F. Higgins,et al.
Techniques for studying nest success of ducks in upland habitats in the prairie pothole region
,
1986
.
[6]
H. W. Miller,et al.
Construction and operation of cable-chain drag for nest searches
,
1977
.