Target Achievement Control Test: evaluating real-time myoelectric pattern-recognition control of multifunctional upper-limb prostheses.

Despite high classification accuracies (~95%) of myoelectric control systems based on pattern recognition, how well offline measures translate to real-time closed-loop control is unclear. Recently, a real-time virtual test analyzed how well subjects completed arm motions using a multiple-degree of freedom (DOF) classifier. Although this test provided real-time performance metrics, the required task was oversimplified: motion speeds were normalized and unintended movements were ignored. We included these considerations in a new, more challenging virtual test called the Target Achievement Control Test (TAC Test). Five subjects with transradial amputation attempted to move a virtual arm into a target posture using myoelectric pattern recognition, performing the test with various classifier (1- vs 3-DOF) and task complexities (one vs three required motions per posture). We found no significant difference in classification accuracy between the 1- and 3-DOF classifiers (97.2% +/- 2.0% and 94.1% +/- 3.1%, respectively; p = 0.14). Subjects completed 31% fewer trials in significantly more time using the 3-DOF classifier and took 3.6 +/- 0.8 times longer to reach a three-motion posture compared with a one-motion posture. These results highlight the need for closed-loop performance measures and demonstrate that the TAC Test is a useful and more challenging tool to test real-time pattern-recognition performance.

[1]  B. Hudgins,et al.  REAL-TIME MYOELECTRIC CONTROL IN A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT TO RELATE USABILITY VS. ACCURACY , 2005 .

[2]  Øyvind Stavdahl,et al.  Functional Outcomes in the WHO-ICF Model: Establishment of the Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures Group , 2009 .

[3]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A Comparison of Surface and Intramuscular Myoelectric Signal Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  L. E. Peppard,et al.  Feature-based classification of myoelectric signals using artificial neural networks , 1998, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  Laura A. Miller,et al.  Summary and Recommendations of the Academy's State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures , 2009 .

[6]  K. Englehart,et al.  Classification of the myoelectric signal using time-frequency based representations. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  F. K. Lam,et al.  Fuzzy EMG classification for prosthesis control. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[11]  R.Fff. Weir,et al.  A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  R.F. Kirsch,et al.  Evaluation of Head Orientation and Neck Muscle EMG Signals as Command Inputs to a Human–Computer Interface for Individuals With High Tetraplegia , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Todd A. Kuiken,et al.  The Effect of ECG Interference on Pattern-Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control for Targeted Muscle Reinnervated Patients , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Øyvind Stavdahl,et al.  Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures (ULPOM): A Working Group and Their Findings , 2009 .

[15]  B. Hudgins,et al.  A Real-Time Pattern Recognition Based Myoelectric Control Usability Study Implemented in a Virtual Environment , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  M. Swiontkowski.  Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Real-time Myoelectric Control of Multifunction Artificial Arms , 2010 .

[17]  Junuk Chu,et al.  A Real-Time EMG Pattern Recognition System Based on Linear-Nonlinear Feature Projection for a Multifunction Myoelectric Hand , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[19]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. 1 Online Electromyographic Control of a Robotic , 2022 .

[22]  F. V. Wright,et al.  Measurement of Functional Outcome With Individuals Who Use Upper Extremity Prosthetic Devices: Current and Future Directions , 2006 .

[23]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Real-time myoelectric decoding of individual finger movements for a virtual target task , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  EMG-based human-robot interface for rehabilitation aid , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[25]  T. Kuiken.  Targeted reinnervation for improved prosthetic function. , 2006, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America.