Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines: Part I — Design and Optimization

A new family of subsonic compressor airfoils, which are characterized by low losses and wide operating ranges, has been designed for use in heavy-duty gas turbines. In particular the influence of the higher airfoil Reynolds numbers compared to aeroengine compressors and the impact of these differences on the location of transition are taken into account. The design process itself is carried out by the combination of a geometric code for the airfoil description, with a blade-to-blade solver and a numerical optimization algorithm. The optimization process includes the design-point losses for a specified Q3D flow problem and the off-design performance for the entire operating range. The family covers a wide range of inlet flow angle, Mach number, flow turning, blade thickness, solidity and AVDR in order to consider the entire range of flow conditions that occur in practical compressor design. The superior performance of the new airfoil family is demonstrated by a comparison with conventional controlled diffusion airfoils (CDA). The advantage in performance has been confirmed by detailed experimental investigations, which will be presented in Part II of the paper. This leads to the conclusion that CDA airfoils that have been primarily developed for aeroengine applications are not the optimum solution, if directly transferred to heavy-duty gas turbines. A significant improvement in compressor efficiency is possible, if the new profiles are used instead of conventional airfoils. @S0889-504X~00!02102-4#

[1]  H. Starken,et al.  Redesign and performance analysis of a transonic axial compressor stator and equivalent plane cascades with subsonic controlled diffusion blades , 1984 .

[2]  R. E. Mayle,et al.  The 1991 IGTI Scholar Lecture: The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines , 1991 .

[3]  E. Schmidt,et al.  Computation of Supercritical Compressor and Turbine Cascades with a Design Method for Transonic Flows , 1980 .

[4]  Robert O. Bullock,et al.  Aerodynamic design of axial-flow compressors , 1965 .

[5]  Sanjay Goel,et al.  Turbine Airfoil Design Optimization , 1996 .

[6]  H. Starken,et al.  Design and Testing of a Controlled Diffusion Airfoil Cascade for Industrial Axial Flow Compressor Application , 1991 .

[7]  Howard P. Hodson,et al.  Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines: Part 1 of 4—Composite Picture , 1997 .

[8]  H. D. Weingold,et al.  Development of Controlled Diffusion Airfoils for Multistage Compressor Application , 1983 .

[9]  N. L. Sanger.  The Use of Optimization Techniques to Design-Controlled Diffusion Compressor Blading , 1982 .

[10]  T. Schulenberg,et al.  The “3A-Series” Gas Turbines With HBR® Combustors , 1995 .

[11]  Josd M. Sam.  Automated Design of Controlled Diffusion Blades , 1988 .

[12]  Howard P. Hodson,et al.  Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines: Part 1 of 4 — Composite Picture , 1995 .

[13]  Michael B. Giles.  Newton solution of steady two-dimensional transonic flow , 1985 .

[14]  Reinhard Mönig,et al.  Development of Advanced Compressor Airfoils for Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines: Part II — Experimental and Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[15]  Mark Drela.  Two-dimensional transonic aerodynamic design and analysis using the Euler equations , 1986 .

[16]  Stephane Pierret,et al.  Turbomachinery Blade Design Using a Navier-Stokes Solver and Artificial Neural Network , 1998 .

[17]  W. Steinert,et al.  Comparison of Controlled Diffusion Airfoils With Conventional NACA 65 Airfoils Developed for Stator Blade Application in a Multistage Axial Compressor , 1985 .