Applicability of Nonlinear Multiple-Degree-of-Freedom Modeling for Design | NIST

The phenomenon of collapse of structures from cyclic dynamic excitation such as that induced by earthquakes is a transitional behavior between bounded oscillations and unbounded drift. To track the response near collapse is difficult and most of the analytical research in this area has been carried out using very simple models. The work presented in this paper continues to focus on simple systems, but investigates the impact that various idealizations have on the computed collapse thresholds. In particular, the effect of large deformations, degrading strength and stiffness, vertical excitations, and bi-directional effects are examined for a hysteretic inverted pendulum system. The justification for the various simplifications commonly applied when deriving reduced models of practical building structures is examined in light of the results obtained.

[1]  Edward Cohen,et al.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 1990 .

[2]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings , 2007 .

[3]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Sidesway collapse of deteriorating structural systems under seismic excitations , 2008 .

[4]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Extension of Modal Pushover Analysis to Compute Member Forces , 2005 .

[5]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Three‐dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings , 2011 .

[6]  Rui Pinho,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VERIFICATION OF A DISPLACEMENT-BASED ADAPTIVE PUSHOVER PROCEDURE , 2004 .

[7]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  PROS AND CONS OF A PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1998 .

[8]  Dionisio Bernal,et al.  Instability of buildings during seismic response , 1998 .

[9]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  A Database in Support of Modeling of Component Deterioration for Collapse Prediction of Steel Frame Structures , 2007 .

[10]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Applied Incremental Dynamic Analysis , 2004 .

[11]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure , 2001 .

[12]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  Progressive Incremental Dynamic Analysis for First-Mode Dominated Structures , 2011 .

[13]  B. Taranath Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2004 .

[14]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty , 2010 .

[15]  W. Iwan,et al.  Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures , 2005 .

[16]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings , 2009 .

[17]  L. Ibarra Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations , 2003 .

[18]  Matjaz Dolsek,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties , 2009 .

[19]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings , 2009 .

[20]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  DIRECT ESTIMATION OF THE SEISMIC DEMAND AND CAPACITY OF MDOF SYSTEMS THROUGH INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF AN SDOF APPROXIMATION , 2005 .

[21]  M. Nuray Aydinoğlu An Incremental Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure Based on Inelastic Spectral Displacements for Multi-Mode Seismic Performance Evaluation , 2003 .

[22]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2000 .

[23]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information , 2005 .

[24]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Structural performance assessment under near‐source pulse‐like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures , 2008 .

[25]  Ronald O. Hamburger,et al.  Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, ANSI/AISC 358-05 , 2006 .

[26]  John W. Wallace,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Reinforced Concrete Walls for Predicting Flexural and Coupled- Shear-Flexural Responses , 2006 .

[27]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure to Estimate Seismic Demands for Buildings: Theory and Preliminary Evaluation , 2001 .

[28]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions , 2007 .

[29]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Fast performance uncertainty estimation via pushover and approximate IDA , 2009 .

[30]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[31]  Iztok Peruš,et al.  On the inelastic torsional response of single‐storey structures under bi‐axial excitation , 2005 .

[32]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2001 .

[33]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Deterioration Modeling of Steel Components in Support of Collapse Prediction of Steel Moment Frames under Earthquake Loading , 2011 .

[34]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Postearthquake Evaluation and Repair Criteria for Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2000 .

[35]  Asce,et al.  Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings , 2003 .

[36]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Alternative non‐linear demand estimation methods for probability‐based seismic assessments , 2009 .

[37]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Probabilistic Basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency Steel Moment Frame Guidelines , 2002 .

[38]  J. Baker,et al.  A vector‐valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon , 2005 .

[39]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .

[40]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  Evaluation of predictors of non‐linear seismic demands using ‘fishbone’ models of SMRF buildings , 2003 .

[41]  Helmut KRAWINKLER,et al.  EVALUATION OF P-DELTA EFFECTS IN NON-DETERIORATING MDOF STRUCTURES FROM EQUIVALENT SDOF SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[42]  Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl,et al.  Moment–Rotation Parameters for Composite Shear Tab Connections , 2004 .

[43]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Object-oriented finite element programming: frameworks for analysis, algorithms and parallel computing , 1997 .

[44]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi‐linear static pushovers through IDA , 2006 .

[45]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  Prediction of the median IDA curve by employing a limited number of ground motion records , 2007 .

[46]  Rakesh K. Goel Evaluation of Modal and FEMA Pushover Procedures Using Strong-Motion Records of Buildings , 2005 .

[47]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings , 2002 .

[48]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings , 2006 .

[49]  Tae-Hyung Lee,et al.  Seismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear‐wall building using FOSM method , 2005 .

[50]  John Hooper,et al.  Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 Methodology for Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors | NIST , 2010 .

[51]  Rui Pinho,et al.  An adaptive capacity spectrum method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action , 2007 .

[52]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  An Empirical Ground-Motion Attenuation Relation for Inelastic Spectral Displacement , 2006 .

[53]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame — a deterministic assessment , 2008 .

[54]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands , 2004 .

[55]  Akshay Gupta,et al.  Dynamic P-Delta Effects for Flexible Inelastic Steel Structures , 2000 .

[56]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric‐plan buildings , 2004 .

[57]  P. P. Diotallevi,et al.  EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL AND ADVANCED PUSHOVER PROCEDURES FOR REGULAR AND IRREGULAR RC FRAMES , 2008 .