Confirmation of family cancer history reported in a population-based survey.

BACKGROUND Knowledge of family cancer history is essential for estimating an individual's cancer risk and making clinical recommendations regarding screening and referral to a specialty cancer genetics clinic. However, it is not clear if reported family cancer history is sufficiently accurate for this purpose. METHODS In the population-based 2001 Connecticut Family Health Study, 1019 participants reported on 20 578 first-degree relatives (FDR) and second-degree relatives (SDR). Of those, 2605 relatives were sampled for confirmation of cancer reports on breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer. Confirmation sources included state cancer registries, Medicare databases, the National Death Index, death certificates, and health-care facility records. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for reports on lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer and after stratification by sex, age, education, and degree of relatedness and used to estimate report accuracy. Pairwise t tests were used to evaluate differences between the two strata in each stratified analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Overall, sensitivity and positive predictive value were low to moderate and varied by cancer type: 60.2% and 40.0%, respectively, for lung cancer reports, 27.3% and 53.5% for colorectal cancer reports, 61.1% and 61.3% for breast cancer reports, and 32.0% and 53.4% for prostate cancer reports. Specificity and negative predictive value were more than 95% for all four cancer types. Cancer history reports on FDR were more accurate than reports on SDR, with reports on FDR having statistically significantly higher sensitivity for prostate cancer than reports on SDR (58.9% vs 21.5%, P = .002) and higher positive predictive value for lung (78.1% vs 31.7%, P < .001), colorectal (85.8% vs 43.5%, P = .004), and breast cancer (79.9% vs 53.6%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS General population reports on family history for the four major adult cancers were not highly accurate. Efforts to improve accuracy are needed in primary care and other health-care settings in which family history is collected to ensure appropriate risk assessment and clinical care recommendations.

[1]  D. McClish,et al.  The Added Value of Claims for Cancer Surveillance: Results of Varying Case Definitions , 2005, Medical care.

[2]  B. Genton,et al.  Improving influenza vaccination rates in the elderly. , 2002, The Journal of family practice.

[3]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications , 1991 .

[4]  R. Hiatt,et al.  National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Family History and Improving Health. , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  D. Evans,et al.  The accuracy of diagnoses as reported in families with cancer: a retrospective study , 1999, Journal of medical genetics.

[7]  Regina Kenen,et al.  We are talking, but are they listening? Communication patterns in families with a history of breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) , 2004, Psycho-oncology.

[8]  A. Halpern,et al.  Family communication after melanoma diagnosis. , 2008, Archives of dermatology.

[9]  S. Cummings,et al.  Genetic Testing of African Americans for Susceptibility to Inherited Cancers , 2000 .

[10]  N. Paynter,et al.  Cancer risk assessment from family history: gaps in primary care practice. , 2002, The Journal of family practice.

[11]  David Haber,et al.  Guide to clinical preventive services: a challenge to physician resourcefulness , 1993 .

[12]  G. Cooper,et al.  The sensitivity of medicare data for identifying incident cases of invasive melanoma (United States) , 2004, Cancer Causes & Control.

[13]  S Kamen,et al.  The task force. , 1976, Journal of hospital dental practice.

[14]  D. Saslow,et al.  Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Issues in Cancer Screening , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[15]  K. Glanz,et al.  Underreporting of family history of colon cancer: correlates and implications. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[16]  H. Campbell,et al.  Accuracy of reporting of family history of colorectal cancer , 2004, Gut.

[17]  Muin J. Khoury,et al.  Developing Family Healthware, a Family History Screening Tool to Prevent Common Chronic Diseases , 2008, Preventing chronic disease.

[18]  H. Murff,et al.  Does this patient have a family history of cancer? An evidence-based analysis of the accuracy of family cancer history. , 2004, JAMA.

[19]  A. Sigurdson,et al.  Comparison between cancers identified by state cancer registry, self-report, and death certificate in a prospective cohort study of US radiologic technologists. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  P. Marcus,et al.  Death certificates provide an adequate source of cause of death information when evaluating lung cancer mortality: an example from the Mayo Lung Project. , 2009, Lung cancer.

[21]  Perceived Intrafamily Melanoma Risk Communication , 2009 .

[22]  Kurt C Stange,et al.  Family history-taking in community family practice: Implications for genetic screening , 2000, Genetics in Medicine.

[23]  H. Murff,et al.  Cancer risk assessment: quality and impact of the family history interview. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[24]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Estimates of the number of US women who could benefit from tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  M. Slattery,et al.  Comparison of self-reported and database-linked family history of cancer data in a case-control study. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  J. Oosterwijk,et al.  Accuracy of family history of cancer: clinical genetic implications , 2000, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[27]  T. Church,et al.  Colorectal cancer deaths as determined by expert committee and from death certificate: a comparison. The Minnesota Study. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  Anne L. Ersig,et al.  Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: implications for family health communication interventions. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[29]  B. Graubard,et al.  Population Estimates of Extended Family Structure and Size , 2008, Public Health Genomics.

[30]  P. Raina,et al.  Collection and use of cancer family history in primary care. , 2007, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[31]  P. Wilson,et al.  Initiative to Decrease Cardiovascular Risk and Increase Quality of Care for Patients Living With HIV/AIDS Executive Summary , 2008 .

[32]  Argyrios Ziogas,et al.  Validation of family history data in cancer family registries. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[33]  K F Rust,et al.  Variance estimation for complex surveys using replication techniques , 1996, Statistical methods in medical research.

[34]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  Can family history be used as a tool for public health and preventive medicine? , 2002, Genetics in Medicine.

[35]  G. Cooper,et al.  The sensitivity of Medicare claims data for case ascertainment of six common cancers. , 1999, Medical care.

[36]  M. Gail,et al.  Colorectal cancer risk prediction tool for white men and women without known susceptibility. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.