Use of support vector regression in structural optimization: Application to vehicle crashworthiness design

Metamodel is widely used to deal with analysis and optimization of complex system. Structural optimization related to crashworthiness is of particular importance to automotive industry nowadays, which involves highly nonlinear characteristics with material and structural parameters. This paper presents two industrial cases using support vector regression (SVR) for vehicle crashworthiness design. The first application aims to improve roof crush resistance force, and the other is lightweight design of vehicle front end structure subject to frontal crash, where SVR is utilized to construct crashworthiness responses. The use of multiple instances of SVR with different kernel types and hyper-parameters simultaneously and select the best accurate one for subsequent optimization is proposed. The case studies present the successful use of SVR for structural crashworthiness design. It is also demonstrated that SVR is a promising alternative for approximating highly nonlinear crash problems, showing a successfully alternative for metamodel-based design optimization in practice.

[1]  Zhao Lu,et al.  Linear programming support vector regression with wavelet kernel: A new approach to nonlinear dynamical systems identification , 2009, Math. Comput. Simul..

[2]  Salvador A. Pintos,et al.  Toward an optimal ensemble of kernel-based approximations with engineering applications , 2006 .

[3]  Yunqian Ma,et al.  Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression , 2004, Neural Networks.

[4]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[5]  Wenjian Wang,et al.  Determination of the spread parameter in the Gaussian kernel for classification and regression , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[6]  Alan M. Shih,et al.  Development of an efficient aerodynamic shape optimization framework , 2009, Math. Comput. Simul..

[7]  S. Gunn.  Support Vector Machines for Classification and Regression , 1998 .

[8]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation , 2001, DAC 2001.

[9]  T. Simpson,et al.  Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models , 2005 .

[10]  R. Haftka,et al.  Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor , 2009 .

[11]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact , 2004 .

[12]  Fabian Duddeck,et al.  Multidisciplinary optimization of car bodies , 2008 .

[13]  T. Simpson,et al.  Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses , 2005, DAC 2003.

[14]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Response surface approximation of Pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization , 2007 .

[15]  Yaochu Jin,et al.  A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation , 2005, Soft Comput..

[16]  Alessandro Rizzo,et al.  Kriging metamodel management in the design optimization of a CNG injection system , 2009, Math. Comput. Simul..

[17]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Kriging Models for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2001 .

[18]  Ping Zhu,et al.  Metamodel-based lightweight design of B-pillar with TWB structure via support vector regression , 2010 .