Perceiving Stability in a Changing World: Combining Shots and Intergrating Views in Motion Pictures and the Real World

One of the central debates in the study of media concerns the relationship between our perception of real-world events and mediated events such as motion pictures. A number of authors have argued convincingly that both rely on similar natural perceptual processes. Here we extend this argument by reviewing research on scene perception showing that the similarity between film and natural perception includes a common tendency to perceive events as continuous in the face of large view-to-view inconsistencies. This research shows that observers are frequently unable to detect large unexpected changes that occur between views, even in objects within their focus of attention. This is true both in mediated stimuli such as motion pictures and during staged real-world interactions. Thus, perception of continuity may be an inference that proceeds in spite of impossible between-view changes, both in motion pictures and real-world scenes.

[1]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision , 2000 .

[2]  D. Simons,et al.  Change Blindness Blindness: The Metacognitive Error of Overestimating Change-detection Ability , 2000 .

[3]  J. Cutting.  The Reality of Illusion: An Ecological Approach to Cognitive Film Theory , 1999 .

[4]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[5]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures , 1997 .

[6]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[7]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Transsaccadic Memory and Integration During Real-World Object Perception , 1997 .

[8]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Annette Michelson,et al.  What is Cinema? , 1995 .

[10]  Stephen Prince,et al.  The Kuleshov Effect: Recreating the Classic Experiment , 1992 .

[11]  J. G. Butler.  "I'm Not a Doctor, but I Play One on TV": Characters, Actors, and Acting in Television Soap Opera , 1991 .

[12]  Renee Hobbs,et al.  How First-Time Viewers Comprehend Editing Conventions , 1988 .

[13]  M. Krieger.  The Ambiguities of Representation and Illusion: An E. H. Gombrich Retrospective , 1984, Critical Inquiry.

[14]  E. Spelke,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  The effects of extraneous response requirements on learning by performers and observers , 1967 .

[16]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: a study of one child's performance. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[17]  H. D. Goldberg,et al.  The role of "cutting" in the perception of the motion picture. , 1951, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  David Bordwell,et al.  Space in the classical film , 1988 .

[19]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays , 1986 .

[20]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Luis Buñuel.  My Last Sigh , 1983 .

[22]  Mary Ann Doane,et al.  The Voice in the Cinema: The Articulation of Body and Space , 1980 .

[23]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .