The Informing Sciences at a Crossroads: The Role of the Client

The essential elements of an informing system are a sender, a communications pathway, and a client. Academic informing systems, however, are best viewed as two interacting informing systems, one that informs clients of a discipline, one that informs clients of the institution. The paper proposes that the greater the degree of overlap between the clients of these two systems, the stronger the position of an individual discipline is likely to be. MIS is presented as an example of a disciplinary informing system that has ceased to inform external clients. This situation, it is argued, is likely to result in the discipline's downfall. The informing sciences transdiscipline itself is then examined using the same lens. While much younger than MIS, the paper argues that informing sciences needs to begin its search for clients in earnest. Building upon lessons learned from another transdiscipline, complex systems, a series of concrete recommendations are presented.

[1]  T. Grandon Gill,et al.  High-tech hidebound: Case studies of information technologies that inhibited organizational learning , 1995 .

[2]  I. Prigogine.  The end of certainty , 1997 .

[3]  Allen S. Lee.  Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone , 1999 .

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[5]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Model Curriculum and Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems , 1997 .

[6]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[8]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Empirical research in information systems: on the relevance of practice in thinking of IS research , 1999 .

[9]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The information systems identity crisis , 2005 .

[10]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Serving Constituencies In Business Schools: M.B.A. Program Versus Research Performance , 2000 .

[11]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  IS '97: model curriculum and guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in information systems , 1996, IS '97.

[12]  J. Mende.  The Poverty of Empiricism , 2005 .

[13]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[14]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[15]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Exploring the Myths about Online Education in Information Systems , 2005, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[16]  T. Grandon Gill.  13 (educational) things i'd rather do over the internet , 2006, ELERN.

[17]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Information Systems Research Thematics: Submissions to a New Journal, 1987-1992 , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline , 2002, MIS Q..

[19]  Zbigniew J. Gackowski.  Quality of Informing: Bias and Disinformation Philosophical Background and Roots (Research in Progress) , 2006 .

[20]  T. Grandon Gill.  What's an MIS paper worth?: (an exploratory analysis) , 2001, DATB.

[21]  Joey F. George,et al.  Does Information Systems Still Matter? Lessons for a Maturing Discipline , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[23]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[24]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Rigor vs. relevance revisited: response to Benbasat and Zmud , 1999 .

[25]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The New Realities , 1989 .

[26]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self‐Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[27]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[28]  Lee A. Freeman,et al.  The Supply and Demand of Information Systems Doctorates: Past, Present, and Future , 2000, MIS Q..

[29]  J. Sutherland.  The Quark and the Jaguar , 1994 .

[30]  K. Peffers,et al.  Identifying and Evaluating the Universe of Outlets for Information Systems Research: Ranking the Journals , 2003 .

[31]  Henry M. Kim,et al.  Information Systems is Not a Reference Discipline (And What We Can Do About It) , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Rudy Hirschheim.  The internet-based education bandwagon: look before you leap , 2005, CACM.

[33]  Kee Young Kim,et al.  An Assessment of Individual and Institutional Research Productivity in DEA , 1998 .