Differential Effects of Repetition on True and False Recognition

Abstract Many studies of recognition memory have shown that repeating a word on a study list increases true recognition (i.e., the hit rate) of that word. Less clear is the extent to which repeating a word on the study list increases false alarms to a semantically related distractor. Five experiments examined the effect of repetition on true and false recognition. In the first two experiments, false recognition of a distractor was only found when five distinct words related to it appeared on the list. In Experiments 3 and 4, presenting a list word either 5 or 10 times failed to increase false recognition of a related distractor, relative to when the list word occurred once. Experiment 5 revealed that when five words related to a distractor were blocked together in the study list, repeating them caused a significant decrease in false recognition of the distractor. Repetition appears to be one variable that differentially affects true and false recognition.

[1]  R. Greene.  Effects of intentionality and strategy on memory for frequency. , 1986 .

[2]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  FALSE-RECOGNITION REVERSAL: WHEN SIMILARITY IS DISTINCTIVE , 1995 .

[3]  I. Begg,et al.  Repetition and trace interaction: Superadditivity , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Generation effects in frequency judgment. , 1988 .

[5]  R. Greene.  On the relationship between categorical frequency estimation and cued recall , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[6]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. , 1995 .

[7]  R. Greene,et al.  False recognition of associates: How robust is the effect? , 1997 .

[8]  J. Deese.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  E. Hirshman,et al.  True and False Recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a Global Matching Perspective , 1998 .

[10]  K. McDermott.  The Persistence of False Memories in List Recall , 1996 .

[11]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[12]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  List-strength Effect: Ii. Theoretical Mechanisms , 1990 .

[13]  B. Underwood.  FALSE RECOGNITION PRODUCED BY IMPLICIT VERBAL RESPONSES. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  James W. Hall,et al.  False Recognitions as a Function of Number of Presentations , 1970 .

[15]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[16]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[17]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Judging Category Frequency: Automaticity or Availability? , 1986 .

[18]  G. M. Reicher,et al.  Clustering in free recall as a function of certain methodological variations. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  C. Richard Puff,et al.  A Consolidated Theoretical View of Stimulus-List Organization Effects in Free Recall , 1974 .

[20]  M. Watkins,et al.  Recall of a twice-presented item without recall of either presentation: generic memory for events , 1985 .