Telecytology for Rapid On-Site Evaluation

Telecytology is the method of interpreting cytology material from a distance using digital representation for cytology evaluation. Pioneering efforts have been underway for over a decade to introduce telecytology into clinical practice. The field of telecytology has been evolving and many of the prior technologies are rapidly becoming outdated. With such expansion, the current applications of telecytology are increasing for clinical practice, quality assurance, education, and research. Although the literature for digital telecytology is relatively scant, this highlights the unique challenges in relation to telecytology platforms, use cases, implementation, and validation. Several modes of telecytology exist, including static (store-and-forward), dynamic (live video streaming), robotic microscopy, whole-slide imaging, or hybrid technology. Considerations for telecytology include understanding the people, processes, and technology in considering and deploying a telecytology system. Challenges when implementing telecytology specific for rapid on-site evaluations (ROSE) may include cost analysis and administrative buy-in, workflow assessment, training, and staffing (i.e., cytotechnologists, trainees, cytopathologists), as well as technical difficulties. Each implementation will be dependent on the intended use case and need for adoption. This chapter covers all of the aforementioned aspects of telecytology for ROSE.

[1]  S S Raab,et al.  Telecytology: diagnostic accuracy in cervical-vaginal smears. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  L. Pantanowitz,et al.  Advantage of Z‐stacking for teleconsultation between the USA and Colombia , 2018, Diagnostic Cytopathology.

[3]  W. Bulman,et al.  Molecular testing on endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) fine needle aspirates (FNA): Impact of triage , 2018, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[4]  K. KhuranaKamal,et al.  Telecytopathology for on-site adequacy evaluation decreases the nondiagnostic rate in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions. , 2014 .

[5]  Yukako Yagi,et al.  Comparison between a traditional single still image and a multiframe video image along the z‐axis of the same microscopic field of interest in cytology: Which does contribute to telecytology? , 2009, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[6]  U. P. Hacısalihoğlu,et al.  Telecytology: Is it possible with smartphone images? , 2018, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[7]  Meenakshi Singh,et al.  Use of telecytology for the immediate assessment of CT guided and endoscopic FNA cytology: Diagnostic accuracy, advantages, and pitfalls , 2012, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[8]  N. Triller,et al.  Telecytology for rapid assessment of cytological specimens , 2012, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  Michael J. Thrall,et al.  Validation of a novel robotic telepathology platform for neuropathology intraoperative touch preparations , 2014, Journal of pathology informatics.

[10]  O. Lin,et al.  Successful Secure High-definition Streaming Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation , 2017, Journal of pathology informatics.

[11]  K. Khurana,et al.  Telecytology and its evolving role in cytopathology , 2012, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[12]  W. Alago,et al.  Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: A Tale of Implementation and Review of Constraints , 2017, Journal of pathology informatics.

[13]  Guoping Cai,et al.  Cytologic evaluation of image-guided fine needle aspiration biopsies via robotic microscopy: A validation study , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[14]  Maheswari S. Mukherjee,et al.  Digital Applications in Cytopathology: Problems, Rationalizations, and Alternative Approaches , 2017, Acta Cytologica.

[15]  A. Kraft Specimen acquisition: ROSEs, gardeners, and gatekeepers , 2017, Cancer cytopathology.

[16]  O. Lin Telecytology for Rapid On-Site Evaluation: Current Status. , 2018, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.

[17]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  American Telemedicine Association clinical guidelines for telepathology , 2014, Journal of pathology informatics.

[18]  O. Lin,et al.  Rapid on‐site evaluation using telecytology: A major cancer center experience , 2019, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[19]  L. Pantanowitz,et al.  Psychological Aspects of Utilizing Telecytology for Rapid On-Site Adequacy Assessments , 2018, Journal of pathology informatics.

[20]  K Yamashiro,et al.  Cytodiagnosis through use of a z‐axis video by volunteer observers: a promising tool for external quality assessment , 2011, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[21]  T. Shet,et al.  An analysis of 46 static telecytology cases over a period of two years , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[22]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  The impact of digital imaging in the field of cytopathology , 2009, CytoJournal.

[23]  H Mizushima,et al.  Telecytology in Hokkaido Island, Japan: results of primary telecytodiagnosis of routine cases , 2004, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.

[24]  L. Hassell,et al.  FaceTime validation study: Low‐cost streaming video for cytology adequacy assessment , 2016, Cancer cytopathology.

[25]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Telecytology: Clinical applications, current challenges, and future benefits , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[26]  K. Khurana,et al.  Feasibility of telecytopathology for rapid preliminary diagnosis of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of axillary lymph nodes in a remote breast care center , 2012, Journal of pathology informatics.

[27]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Experience with multimodality telepathology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , 2012, Journal of pathology informatics.

[28]  M. Ziol,et al.  Expert consultation for cervical carcinoma smears. Reliability of selected-field videomicroscopy. , 1999, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[29]  V. Padmanabhan,et al.  Implementation of Telecytology for Immediate Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspirations Compared to Conventional On-Site Evaluation: Analysis of 240 Consecutive Cases , 2012, Acta Cytologica.

[30]  Sahussapont Joseph Sirintrapun,et al.  Robotic Telecytology for Remote Cytologic Evaluation without an On-site Cytotechnologist or Cytopathologist: An Active Quality Assessment and Experience of Over 400 Cases , 2017, Journal of pathology informatics.