Application of accelerated failure model for the oil and gas industry in Arctic region

The development of offshore energy resources involves highly complex and extensive technological processes. Therefore all relevant factors which can affect equipment performance and safety must be identified and quantified exactly. This is more critical when the design is going to be established for a new operational environment such as the Arctic region with new challenges. There are a few data and little experience available regarding operation equipment in the offshore oil and gas industry in the Arctic region. However, the oil and gas industry has established regular programs such as OREDA (Offshore Reliability Data), in order to collect reliability data. Using this type of data, collected from similar systems but under different operational environmental locations, in designing processes for the Arctic region may lead to incorrect design. This may increase risk with respect to Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) or/and increase costs. Therefore, the available data need to be considered according to the environment condition. According to the existing literature, an accelerated failure time (AFT) model is a useful approach in order to consider the effect of the operational environment on the performance of equipment. The aim of this paper is to develop a methodology in order to predict the reliability of equipment in the Arctic region using an accelerated failure time (AFT) model. An illustrative numerical example is used to demonstrate how the model can be applied in a real case.

[1]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data: Kalbfleisch/The Statistical , 2002 .

[2]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[3]  Luis A. Escobar,et al.  A Review of Recent Research and Current Issues in Accelerated Testing , 1993 .

[4]  William Q. Meeker,et al.  A Review of Accelerated Test Models , 2006, 0708.0369.

[5]  Dhananjay Kumar,et al.  Some Reliability Models for Analyzing the Effect of Operating Conditions , 1997 .

[6]  Ove T. Gudmestad,et al.  Technological challenges for hydrocarbon production in the Barents Sea , 1994 .

[7]  Richard Kay,et al.  Comparing proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models: an application in influenza , 2006, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[8]  Tore Markeset,et al.  An approach for prediction of petroleum production facility performance considering Arctic influence factors , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  P. McCullagh Regression Models for Ordinal Data , 1980 .

[10]  Per Hokstad,et al.  Practical experience with a data collection project: the OREDA project , 1996 .

[11]  W. Meeker Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analyses , 1991 .

[12]  Richard Kay,et al.  On the Use of the Accelerated Failure Time Model As An Alternative to the Proportional Hazards Model in the Treatment of Time to Event Data: A Case Study in Influenza , 2002 .

[13]  Uday Kumar,et al.  Availability allocation through importance measures , 2007 .

[14]  Tore Markeset,et al.  Review and discussion of production assurance program , 2010 .

[15]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[16]  Martin Newby,et al.  Accelerated failure time models for reliability data analysis , 1988 .

[17]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[18]  Z. Ying,et al.  Accelerated failure time models for counting processes , 1998 .

[19]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  Proportional hazards model: a review , 1994 .

[20]  Luis A. Escobar,et al.  Accelerated degradation tests: modeling and analysis , 1998 .