Understanding and predicting the quality determinants of e-government services: A two-staged regression-neural network model

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the quality determinants influencing the adoption of e-government services in Oman and compare the performance of multiple regression and neural network models in identifying the significant factors influencing adoption in Oman. Design/methodology/approach – Primary data concerning service quality determinants and demographic variables were collected using a structured questionnaire survey. The variables selected in the design of the questionnaire were based on an extensive literature review. Factor analysis, multiple linear regression and neural network models were employed to analyze data. Findings – The study found that quality determinants: responsiveness, security, efficiency and reliability are statistically significant predictors of adoption. The neural network model performed better than the regression model in the prediction of e-government services’ adoption and was able to characterize the non-linear relationship of the aforementioned predic...

[1]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[2]  Harold W. Webb,et al.  SiteQual: an integrated measure of Web site quality , 2004, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[3]  Brian Corbitt,et al.  E‐government adoption in Oman: motivating factors from a government perspective , 2013 .

[4]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in e-government , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[5]  J. Carman Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions , 1990 .

[6]  Hafedh Al-Shihi,et al.  Exploring quality of e-Government services in Oman , 2013 .

[7]  Nghiep Nguyen,et al.  Predicting Housing Value: A Comparison of Multiple Regression Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks , 2001 .

[8]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[9]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[10]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  E-S-QUAL A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality , 2004 .

[11]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Designing E-Government Services: Key Service Attributes and Citizens’ Preference Structures , 2012 .

[12]  Randall S. Sexton,et al.  Predicting Internet/ e-commerce use , 2002, Internet Res..

[13]  C. Grönroos A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications , 1984 .

[14]  M. Gilly,et al.  eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality , 2003 .

[15]  Chang Liu,et al.  Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Dursun Delen,et al.  Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  IT-Mediated Customer Service Content and Delivery in Electronic Governments: An Empirical Investigation of the Antecedents of Service Quality , 2013, MIS Q..

[18]  W. Huang,et al.  E-Government Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries: An Implementation Framework and Case Study , 2006, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[19]  David A. Griffith,et al.  An Examination of the Web-Based Strategies of the Top 100 U.S. Retailers , 1998 .

[20]  Peter Woods,et al.  Predictors for E-government Adoption in Jordan: Deployment of an Empirical Evaluation Based on a Citizen-centric Approach , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[21]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Developing a Scale to Measure the Perceived Quality of an Internet Shopping Site (PQISS) , 2015 .

[22]  J. J. Cronin,et al.  Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach , 2001 .

[23]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Phillip R. Burrell,et al.  The impact of neural networks in finance , 1997, Neural Computing & Applications.

[25]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  An analysis of methodologies utilised in e-government research: A user satisfaction perspective , 2012, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A comparison of neural network, evidential reasoning and multiple regression analysis in modelling bridge risks , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  M. Sadiq Sohail,et al.  Online Information , 2014 .

[28]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  Servperf versus Servqual: Reconciling Performance-Based and Perceptions-Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality , 1994 .

[29]  S. Katircioğlu,et al.  Service quality and university students' satisfaction on the travel agencies , 2012 .

[30]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[31]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  Predicting m-commerce adoption determinants: A neural network approach , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Understanding the Antecedents and Consequences of E-Government Service Quality: Transactional Frequency as a Moderator of Citizens' Quality Perceptions , 2010, ECIS.

[33]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Engaging Citizens in Managing Electronic Government Service Quality: A Country-Level Analysis , 2011, ICIS.

[34]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Current practices of leading e-government countries , 2005, Commun. ACM.

[35]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  WebQual: An Exploration of Web-Site Quality , 2000, ECIS.

[36]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  Predicting and explaining patronage behavior toward web and traditional stores using neural networks: a comparative analysis with logistic regression , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[37]  Hyun Joon Kim,et al.  The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Gregoris Mentzas,et al.  Analysing e-government service quality in Greece , 2011, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[39]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The endless wire: e-government as global phenomenon , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[40]  Samer Faraj,et al.  The Role of Intermediaries in the Development of Trust on the WWW: The Use and Prominence of Trusted Third Parties and Privacy Statements , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[41]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[42]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Global Measures of Information Service Quality: A Cross‐National Study , 1995 .

[43]  William J. Kettinger,et al.  Replication of Measures in Information Systems Research: The Case of IS SERVQUAL* , 1999 .

[44]  Benedetto Barabino,et al.  Measuring service quality in urban bus transport: a modified SERVQUAL approach , 2012 .

[45]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[46]  Gregoris Mentzas,et al.  e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[47]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  Predictive Analytics in Information Systems Research , 2010, MIS Q..