System dynamics model of a biotechonomy

The need for substitution of fossil resources with renewable alternatives, for an efficient use of the bio-resources, and for the development of knowledge-intensive sustainable economies call for the design of policies to create and govern biotechonomic systems. The goal of this study is to create a tool to facilitate such policy design, - aimed at the development of biotechonomic systems by use of a system dynamics model. This model constitutes a general framework for the representation of critical biotechonomic sectors; their land use, production and consumption of raw material, research and development, investments in and utilization of production capacities (i.e. capital investments), their utilization of labour, finances (value creation, capital and operating costs and profit), and sustainability. A sustainability index, based on emergy is applied to assess the environmental performance of the various sectors considered. Moreover, the model is operational and lends itself to the simulation of the development of these sectors, both past and future. This model may be applied to a variety of biotechonomic sectors and extends to the cyclical economy at large. As the purpose of this model is to facilitate the development and testing of policies, the model allows for the inclusion of structural components that represent such policies, including the extension of production lines, the utilization of taxes and subsidies to modify the land use and to encourage the redirection of materials, and support for the investment in research, development and capital. Model is applied to example of birch use as raw material. Results show that model framework can be applied to micro, meso and macro level planning and policy making.

[1]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[2]  David Ness Sustainable urban infrastructure in China: Towards a Factor 10 improvement in resource productivity through integrated infrastructure systems , 2008 .

[3]  Anna Ekman,et al.  Bioresource utilisation by sustainable technologies in new value-added biorefinery concepts - two case studies from food and forest industry , 2013 .

[4]  A.J.M. Smits,et al.  Visions of Sustainability in Bioeconomy Research , 2014 .

[5]  C. Turner,et al.  Evaluation and analysis of environmentally sustainable methodologies for extraction of betulin from birch bark with a focus on industrial feasibility , 2016 .

[6]  Omprakash Sarkar,et al.  Waste biorefinery models towards sustainable circular bioeconomy: Critical review and future perspectives. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[7]  Simone Manfredi,et al.  Environmental sustainability assessment of bioeconomy value chains , 2016 .

[8]  M. Meireles,et al.  Anacardium occidentale L. leaves extraction via SFE: Global yields, extraction kinetics, mathematical modeling and economic evaluation , 2013 .

[9]  M. Prosperi,et al.  Puzzling stakeholder views for long-term planning in the bio-economy : A back-casting application , 2016 .

[10]  A. Brent,et al.  Modelling the transition towards a green economy in South Africa , 2014 .

[11]  N. Scarlat,et al.  The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: Policies and facts , 2015 .

[12]  Guido Van Huylenbroeck,et al.  Managing innovation in the bioeconomy : an open innovation perspective , 2016 .

[13]  M. Boehlje,et al.  The Increasing Multifunctionality of Agricultural Raw Materials: Three Dilemmas for Innovation and Adoption , 2011 .

[14]  Yaman Barlas,et al.  Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics , 1996 .

[15]  M. Common,et al.  Natural resource and environmental economics , 1996 .

[16]  S. Ulgiati,et al.  A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems , 2016 .

[17]  A. Ragauskas,et al.  Economic Analysis of an Organosolv Process for Bioethanol Production , 2014 .