PERCEPTUAL EFFECTS OF AUDITORY INFORMATION ABOUT OWN AND OTHER MOVEMENTS

In sport accurate predictions of other persons’ movements are essential. Former studies have shown that predictions can be enhanced by mapping movements onto sound (sonification) and providing audiovisual feedback [1]. The present study investigated behavioral mechanisms of movement sonification and scrutinized whether effects of own movements and those of other persons can be predicted just by listening to them. Eight athletes heard sonifications of an indoor rower and quantified resulting velocities of a virtual boat. Although boat velocity was not mapped onto sound directly, it explained subjects’ quantifications by regression analysis (R-squared = 0.80) significantly better than the directly sonified amplitude and force parameters. Thus perception of boat velocity might have emerged from those sonifications. Predictions of effects of unknown movements were above chance level and as good as predictions of own movements. Furthermore athletes were able to identify their own technique among others ( d’ = 0.47 ± 0.43). The results confirm large perceptual effects of auditory feedback and - most importantly - suggest that movement sonification can address central motor representations just by listening to it. Therefore not only predictability but also synchronization with other persons’ movements might be supported.

[1]  Natalie Sebanz,et al.  Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[2]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[3]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[4]  Lukas Scheef,et al.  Multimodal motion processing in area V5/MT: Evidence from an artificial class of audio-visual events , 2009, Brain Research.

[5]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Nina Schaffert,et al.  Listen to the boat motion: acoustic information for elite rowers , 2010 .

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Hearing Sounds, Understanding Actions: Action Representation in Mirror Neurons , 2002, Science.

[8]  A. Williams,et al.  Visual search strategy, selective attention, and expertise in soccer. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[9]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Shared networks for auditory and motor processing in professional pianists: Evidence from fMRI conjunction , 2006, NeuroImage.

[11]  Cordula Vesper,et al.  A minimal architecture for joint action , 2010, Neural Networks.

[12]  G. Knoblich,et al.  Predicting the Effects of Actions: Interactions of Perception and Action , 2001, Psychological science.

[13]  Alfred Effenberg,et al.  Movement sonification: Effects on perception and action , 2005, IEEE MultiMedia.

[14]  Andreas Weber,et al.  Movement Sonification: Audiovisual benefits on motor learning , 2011 .

[15]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Actions and Consequences in Bimanual Interaction Are Represented in Different Coordinate Systems , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  B. Repp,et al.  Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On the possible role of action simulation in synchronization , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  A. Effenberg,et al.  Observation of sonified movements engages a basal ganglia frontocortical network , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[19]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Authorship effects in the prediction of handwriting strokes: Evidence for action simulation during action perception , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.