Smallholder dairy production and marketing—Opportunities and constraints

The dairy sector in the South Asian countries of Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka is characterised as follows: by small-scale, widely dispersed and unorganised milch animal holders; low productivity; lack of assured year-round remunerative producer price for milk; inadequate basic infrastructure for provision of production inputs and services, and for procurement, transportation, processing and marketing of milk; and lack of professional management. Other important characteristics of the dairy sector in these countries are the predominance of mixed crop–livestock farms and the fact that most of the milch animals are fed on crop by-products and residues, which have a very low opportunity cost. In addition, dairy development policies and programmes followed in these countries, including those relating to foreign trade, are not congenial to promoting sustainable and equitable dairy development. Low productivity of milch animals is a serious constraint to dairy development in all the countries under review. This is due mostly to low genetic potential of the milch animals, and inadequate and inappropriate feeding and animal health care. The productivity of dairy animals in all five selected countries could be increased substantially through crossbreeding of the low yielding nondescript cows with high yielding selected indigenous purebreds or suitable exotic breeds in a phased manner and by better feeding, disease control and management. The cattle breeding policy should also provide for the production of good quality bullocks to meet the draft power requirement of agriculture. Upgrading of nondescript buffalo through selective breeding with high yielding purebreds should be given a high priority in all areas where buffalo are well adapted to the agroclimatic conditions. While fixing procurement price, producers’ interest should receive the utmost attention. The producer price should at least cover the long-run average cost of milk production and provide a reasonable mark-up. 88 South–South Workshop * The authors of this paper are grateful to the authors of the India (Kurup 2002), Bangladesh (Saadullah 2002), Pakistan (Raja 2002), Nepal (Joshi and Tarak Bahadur 2002) and Sri Lanka (Bandara 2002) country papers, prepared for this South–South Workshop, for allowing them to draw upon their papers and to anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of the paper. However, they alone are responsible for the views and opinions expressed in the paper and for errors of omission and commission, if any, in the paper. Dairy plants, cattle feed factories, technical inputs and services should be managed professionally and run as commercial enterprises and not as social welfare schemes. The role of governments in these countries should be to direct, co-ordinate and regulate the activities of various organisations engaged in dairy development, to establish and maintain a level playing field for all stakeholders and to create and maintain a congenial socio-economic, institutional and political environment for smallholder dairy development. On the whole, the smallholder dairy sector has high potential to be a dependable source of livelihood for the vast majority of rural poor in the South Asian countries. The AMUL model of small-scale dairy production and marketing, as evolved and refined over the last 50 years in India, offers an appropriate strategy for promoting sustainable, equitable and gender-sensitive smallholder dairy development in not only South Asian countries but also in all other developing countries of the world. The model needs to be replicated in these countries, with adaptations being made to suit the peculiar conditions of each specific country. The new world trade regime ushered in by the World Trade Organization (WTO) poses several challenges and opens up many opportunities for smallholder milk producers in South Asian countries. There is need for these countries to enhance their competitive economic advantage in dairy products in terms of both quality and cost. Furthermore, it is high time that the South Asian governments formulated and announced comprehensive dairy development policies for each of their countries. These should form an integral part of their national development policies and due consideration should be given to their direct and indirect effects on other sub-sectors of the economy and vice versa.

[1]  Francis N. Gichuki,et al.  More People, Less Erosion: Environmental Recovery in Kenya , 1994 .

[2]  V. Bocci A Brief Historical Review , 2002 .

[3]  D. Strauch Animal production and environmental health. , 1987 .

[4]  R. Blair,et al.  Strategies to reduce environmental pollution from animal manure: Principles and nutritional management - A Review - , 1996 .

[5]  Muhammad Yunus,et al.  Banker to the Poor , 1999 .

[6]  J. Church Human Development Report , 2001 .

[7]  M. O. Owango,et al.  Dairy co-operatives and policy reform in Kenya: effects of livestock service and milk market liberalisation , 1998 .

[8]  Robert M. Townsend,et al.  Risk and Insurance in Village India , 1994 .

[9]  N. Tambi,et al.  Probit analysis of livestock producers' demand for private veterinary services in the high potential agricultural areas of Kenya , 1999 .

[10]  J. Tanner,et al.  Manure management in the Kenya Highlands: Practices and potential , 1998 .

[11]  S. A. Okantah Partial milking of cattle in smallholder herds on the Accra Plains: some factors affecting daily partial milk yield and milk composition , 1992 .

[12]  H. Chenery Comparative Advantage and Development Policy , 1965 .

[13]  Mark W. Rosegrant,et al.  LIVESTOCK TO 2020: THE REVOLUTION CONTINUES , 2001 .

[14]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Credit Market Constraints, Consumption Smoothing, and the Accumulation of Durable Production Assets in Low-Income Countries: Investments in Bullocks in India , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  G. Firebaugh,et al.  Rural Development: Principles, Policies, and Management , 1986 .

[16]  Merlinda Ingco Agricultural Trade Liberalization in the Uruguay Round: One Step Forward, One Step Back? , 1995 .

[17]  M. O. Owango,et al.  Dairy development in Kenya: the past, the present and the future. , 2000 .

[18]  S. Staal,et al.  Women and the sustainable development of market-oriented dairying: evidence from the highlands of East Africa , 1999 .

[19]  S. Ominde Kenya's Population Growth And Development To The Year 2000 , 1988 .

[20]  J. Alam Livestock resources in Bangladesh: present status and future potential. , 1995 .

[21]  Steven J. Staal,et al.  Smallholder dairying under transactions costs in East Africa , 1997 .

[22]  Oppong En Bovine brucellosis in southern Ghana. , 1966 .

[23]  P. Gyawu,et al.  Post-partum Reproductive Performance of Sanga Cattle in Smallholder Peri-urban Dairy Herds in the Accra Plains of Ghana , 1999, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[24]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[25]  正弘 中舘 OECD (経済開発協力機構) : Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development , 1991 .

[26]  Steven J. Staal,et al.  Periurban dairying and public policy in Ethiopia and Kenya : a comparative economic and institutional analysis , 1996 .

[27]  Claude B. Courbois,et al.  Livestock to 2020: The Next Food Revolution , 2001 .

[28]  M. Walshe Dairy development in Sub-Saharan Africa : a study of issues and options , 1991 .

[29]  W. Conelly Colonial era livestock development policy: Introduction of improved dairy cattle in high-potential farming areas of Kenya , 1998 .

[30]  M. Turner The sustainability of rangeland to cropland nutrient transfer in semi-arid West Africa: Ecological and social dimensions neglected in the debate , 1995 .

[31]  H. Fitzhugh Global agenda for livestock research , 1998 .

[32]  J. Lenihan,et al.  Food, Agriculture and the Environment , 1976 .

[33]  B D Akanmori,et al.  Prevalence of tuberculosis in cattle in the Dangme-West district of Ghana, public health implications. , 2000, Acta tropica.

[34]  W. M. Corden,et al.  The Theory of Protection , 1972 .

[35]  G. Mullins,et al.  Impacts of intensive dairy production on smallholder farm women in coastal Kenya , 1996 .

[36]  R. K. Shukla,et al.  Impact evaluation of operation flood on rural dairy sector , 1999 .

[37]  L. Maarse,et al.  Making Change Strategies Work - Gender sensitive, client oriented livestock extension in Coast Province, Kenya , 1998 .

[38]  C. Devendra Strategies for Improved Feed Utilisation and Ruminant Production Systems in the Asian Region , 2000 .

[39]  M. O. Owango,et al.  Characterisation of Dairy Systems Supplying the Nairobi Milk Market A Pilot Survey in Kiambu District for the Identification of Target Groups of Producers , 1997 .