Induced internal noise in perceptual artificial scotomas created by surrounding dynamic noise

Research has shown that exposure to a homogeneous gray patch surrounded by a dynamic noise background causes filling-in of the artificial scotoma by the twinkling noise from the surround. When the background is switched off, observers report perception of a prolonged patch of twinkling noise in the unstimulated area. We studied the effects of exposure to a centrally presented artificial scotoma and the twinkling aftereffect on the threshold for detecting a foveal Gabor patch embedded in external scotoma noise. The detection thresholds were mainly elevated in the absence of scotoma noise and less affected at higher levels of scotoma noise. The analysis of the experimental data using the equivalent input noise approach revealed that the reduced contrast sensitivity is due to induced internal noise whose variance is proportional to the strength of the surrounding noise. We did not find significant effects on the internal noise in a control experiment using flickering Gaussian noise samples of 1.6 Hz which did not cause filling-in and dynamic afterimage. These findings suggest that the perceptual phenomena caused by artificial scotomas may reflect increased variability of neural activity due to long-range interactions between the surrounding noise and unstimulated region of the artificial scotoma.

[1]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Vision: Coding and Efficiency , 1991 .

[2]  A. E. Burgess,et al.  Vision: High level visual decision efficiencies , 1991 .

[3]  Christopher W. Tyler,et al.  Lateral modulation of BOLD activation in unstimulated regions of the human visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision , 1991, Nature.

[5]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  C. Tyler,et al.  Induced twinkle aftereffect as a probe of dynamic visual processing mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[7]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex , 1992, Nature.

[8]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[9]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.

[10]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[11]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  Dynamic noise backgrounds facilitate target fading , 1992, Vision Research.

[12]  C. Gilbert.  Horizontal integration and cortical dynamics , 1992, Neuron.

[13]  H. Komatsu.  The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  E. Smith,et al.  Effects of Selective Attention on Perceptual Filling-in , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  D. Levi,et al.  Dynamic random noise shrinks the twinkling aftereffect induced by artificial scotomas , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Perceptual filling-in: a parametric study , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  Peter De Weerd,et al.  Responses of cells in monkey visual cortex during perceptual filling-in of an artificial scotoma , 1995, Nature.

[21]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[22]  D. Pelli.  The quantum efficiency of vision , 1990 .

[23]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Filling-in: From perceptual completion to cortical reorganization. , 2003 .

[24]  C W Tyler,et al.  Long-Range Twinkle Induction: An Achromatic Rebound Effect in the Magnocellular Processing System? , 1998, Perception.

[25]  J. A. Movshon,et al.  The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast , 1981, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Finding out about filling-in: a guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[27]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Filling-in the details on perceptual fading , 2001, Vision Research.

[28]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[29]  R. L. Gregory,et al.  Perceptual fading of visual texture borders , 1993, Vision Research.

[30]  C. Gilbert.  Adult cortical dynamics. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[31]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[32]  U. Polat,et al.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold , 1998, Nature.

[33]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Receptive field structure in the visual cortex: does selective stimulation induce plasticity? , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[35]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[36]  H. Barlow.  The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[37]  G. Vining,et al.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .