Optimising Nudges in Public Space: Identifying and Tackling Barriers to Design and Implementation

ABSTRACT This paper explores how applying psychological and cognitive theories in nudge design can increase the effectiveness of nudging in public space. Nudges are those policy instruments that alter human behaviour by exploiting cognitive biases/heuristics, without limiting the choice set. Based on interviews with Dutch urban planners, barriers in applying such behavioural theories are identified. These barriers relate both to urban planners’ inexperience with nudging and to the organisational and societal context in which nudges are designed. A design framework is presented to optimise the design of nudges by helping planners to identify when and where nudging is feasible.

[1]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF SCRIPT-BASED TRAVEL MODE CHOICE AFTER FORCED CHANGE , 2003 .

[2]  Yashar Saghai,et al.  Salvaging the concept of nudge , 2013, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[3]  Robert West,et al.  The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide To Designing Interventions , 2014 .

[4]  N. Raihani.  Nudge politics: efficacy and ethics , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[5]  M. Howlett,et al.  Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design , 2019, Public Policy and Administration.

[6]  D. Kahneman.  Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[7]  T. Hartmann,et al.  Managing public space – A blind spot of urban planning and design , 2020 .

[8]  B. Gardner,et al.  The Measurement of Habit , 2018 .

[9]  J. Honey-Rosés.  A Review of Field Experiments in Planning and Urban Research , 2019, Planning Practice & Research.

[10]  Bence Palfi,et al.  A Systematic Scoping Review of the Choice Architecture Movement: Towards Understanding When and Why Nudges Work , 2017 .

[11]  L. Hirsch,et al.  Weaponizing Classical Music: Crime Prevention and Symbolic Power in the Age of Repetition , 2007 .

[12]  Niklas K. Steffens,et al.  Why a nudge is not enough: a social identity critique of governance by stealth , 2015 .

[13]  Pelle Guldborg Hansen,et al.  Nudge and the Manipulation of Choice , 2013, European Journal of Risk Regulation.

[14]  Matthew Carmona,et al.  Contemporary Public Space, Part Two: Classification , 2010 .

[15]  Agnis Stibe,et al.  Persuasive Backfiring: When Behavior Change Interventions Trigger Unintended Negative Outcomes , 2016, PERSUASIVE.

[16]  Björn Meder,et al.  Beyond the confines of choice architecture: A critical analysis , 2018, Journal of Economic Psychology.

[17]  Michael Howlett.  Matching policy tools and their targets: beyond nudges and utility maximisation in policy design , 2017 .

[18]  Max Vetter,et al.  A Review and Taxonomy of Choice Architecture Techniques , 2016 .

[19]  Andrew Faulkner,et al.  Vividness of Visual Imagery and Incidental Recall of Verbal Cues, When Phenomenological Availability Reflects Long-Term Memory Accessibility , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[20]  Reimund Schwarze,et al.  Nudging as a new 'soft' tool in environmental policy. An analysis based on insights from cognitive and social psychology , 2015 .

[21]  Thomas Schillemans,et al.  Simple nudges that are not so easy , 2020 .

[22]  Dibakar Saha,et al.  Toward Safe Systems: Traffic Safety, Cognition, and the Built Environment , 2020, Journal of Planning Education and Research.

[23]  B. Whitley.  Principles of research in behavioral science , 1996 .

[24]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Nudging: A promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? , 2016 .

[25]  Matthew Carmona,et al.  The formal and informal tools of design governance , 2017 .

[26]  Elisabete A. Silva,et al.  Mapping the Landscape of Behavioral Theories: Systematic Literature Review , 2020, Journal of Planning Literature.

[27]  Gregory M. Walton,et al.  The New Science of Wise Psychological Interventions , 2014 .

[28]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Auto-Disabilities: The Case of Shared Space Environments , 2012 .

[29]  Á. Ní Choisdealbha,et al.  The case for laboratory experiments in behavioural public policy , 2018, Behavioural Public Policy.

[30]  P. John.  How Far to Nudge , 2018 .

[31]  Marco te Brömmelstroet,et al.  Sometimes you want people to make the right choices for the right reasons: potential perversity and jeopardy of behavioural change campaigns in the mobility domain , 2014 .

[32]  Terence Love,et al.  A Review and Current Status of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) , 2015 .

[33]  C. Doberstein,et al.  Nudging NIMBY: Do positive messages regarding the benefits of increased housing density influence resident stated housing development preferences? , 2016 .

[34]  Chris Arney.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[35]  Annette M. Kim.  Unimaginable Change , 2011 .

[36]  Nudges that fail , 2017, Behavioural Public Policy.

[37]  Robert Sugden,et al.  On Nudging: A Review of Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein , 2009 .

[38]  Jason Lowther,et al.  How far to nudge? Assessing behavioural public policy , 2019, Local Government Studies.