Ethics in nanomedicine.

As the science and technology of nanomedicine speed ahead, ethics, policy and the law are struggling to keep up. It is important to proactively address the ethical, social and regulatory aspects of nanomedicine in order to minimize its adverse impacts on the environment and public health and also to avoid a public backlash. At present, the most significant concerns involve risk assessment, risk management of engineered nanomaterials and risk communication. Although in vivo animal experiments and ex vivo laboratory analyses can increase our understanding of the interaction of engineered nanomaterials in biological systems, they cannot eliminate all of the uncertainty surrounding the exposure of a human subject to nanomedicine products in clinical trials. Significant risks can still materialize after a product has cleared the Phase I hurdle and is in Phase II or III clinical trials. Furthermore, as the use of engineered nanomaterials in nanomedicine increases, questions of social justice, access to healthcare and the use of nanotechnology for physical enhancement become increasingly important.

[1]  D. Resnik,et al.  Ethical issues in clinical trials involving nanomedicine. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[2]  N. Biller-Andorno,et al.  Nanomedicine–emerging or re-emerging ethical issues? A discussion of four ethical themes , 2007, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[3]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[4]  Volker Wagner,et al.  The emerging nanomedicine landscape , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Ken Donaldson,et al.  Resolving the nanoparticles paradox. , 2006, Nanomedicine.

[6]  K K Jain,et al.  Role of nanotechnology in developing new therapies for diseases of the nervous system. , 2006, Nanomedicine.

[7]  P. Werfel The pursuit of perfection. , 2006, JEMS : a journal of emergency medical services.

[8]  J. Darbyshire,et al.  Injury to research volunteers--the clinical-research nightmare. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  B. Strom,et al.  How the US drug safety system should be changed. , 2006, JAMA.

[10]  Robert Combes,et al.  TGN1412: Time to Change the Paradigm for the Testing of New Pharmaceuticals , 2006, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[11]  Kristy Mills,et al.  Getting the best from nanotechnology: approaching social and ethical implications openly and proactively , 2005, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[12]  Wolfgang Kreyling,et al.  Ultrafine Particles Cross Cellular Membranes by Nonphagocytic Mechanisms in Lungs and in Cultured Cells , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  Armin Grunwald,et al.  Nanotechnology — A new field of ethical inquiry? , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[14]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[15]  M Sugisaka,et al.  Nanotechnology on duty in medical applications. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[16]  P. Hoet,et al.  Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks , 2004, Journal of nanobiotechnology.

[17]  Theresa M Allen,et al.  Advantages of liposomal delivery systems for anthracyclines. , 2004, Seminars in oncology.

[18]  F. Martin,et al.  Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: proof of principle using preclinical animal models and pharmacokinetic studies. , 2004, Seminars in oncology.

[19]  D. Resnik Fair Drug Prices and the Patent System , 2004, Health Care Analysis.

[20]  N. Fost,et al.  hGH for short stature: ethical issues raised by expanded access. , 2004, The Journal of pediatrics.

[21]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Data safety and monitoring boards. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  S. Krown Highly active antiretroviral therapy in AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma: implications for the design of therapeutic trials in patients with advanced, symptomatic Kaposi's sarcoma. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Jenny R. Roberts,et al.  Skin as a route of exposure and sensitization in chronic beryllium disease. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[24]  D. Podzamczer,et al.  Response to Liposomal Doxorubicin and Clinical Outcome of HIV-1–Infected Patients with Kaposi’s Sarcoma Receiving Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy , 2001, HIV clinical trials.

[25]  U. Hengge,et al.  Long-term chemotherapy of HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma with liposomal doxorubicin. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[26]  D. Resnik Developing drugs for the developing world: an economic, legal, moral, and political dilemma. , 2001, Developing world bioethics.

[27]  D. Osoba,et al.  Effect of Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS)-Related Kaposi's Sarcoma: A Randomized Trial of Pegylated-Liposomal Doxorubicin Versus Doxorubicin, Bleomycin, and Vincristine , 2001, Cancer investigation.

[28]  R. Mitsuyasu,et al.  AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: current treatment options, future trends. , 2000, Oncology.

[29]  C. Grady,et al.  What makes clinical research ethical? , 2000, JAMA.

[30]  S. Remick,et al.  AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: a phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin. The TLC D-99 Study Group. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[31]  M A Fischl,et al.  Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: results of a randomized phase III clinical trial. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  F. Goebel,et al.  Liposomal doxorubicin in pulmonary Kaposi's sarcoma: improved survival as compared to patients without liposomal doxorubicin. , 1998, European journal of medical research.

[33]  F. Mulcahy,et al.  Treatment of Kaposi's sarcoma with liposomal doxorubicin. , 1995, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[34]  S. Cohen Human relevance of animal carcinogenicity studies. , 1995, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[35]  P. Kern,et al.  Liposomal doxorubicin in AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: long-term experiences , 1994, The clinical investigator.

[36]  D. Maloney Toxicity tests in animals: extrapolating to human risks. , 1993, Environmental health perspectives.

[37]  F. Martin,et al.  Extravasation and transcytosis of liposomes in Kaposi's sarcoma-like dermal lesions of transgenic mice bearing the HIV tat gene. , 1993, The American journal of pathology.

[38]  E. Beck,et al.  Changing disease patterns in patients with AIDS in a referral centre in the United Kingdom: the changing face of AIDS. , 1991, BMJ.

[39]  R. K. Reynolds,et al.  The HIV tat gene induces dermal lesions resembling Kaposi's sarcoma in transgenic mice , 1988, Nature.

[40]  A. Cornish-Bowden The pursuit of perfection , 2004 .

[41]  M. Mehlman How will we regulate genetic enhancement? , 1999, Wake Forest law review.

[42]  F. Goebel,et al.  Liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma. , 1994, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[43]  D Tomlinson,et al.  Liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil): an effective new treatment for Kaposi's sarcoma in AIDS. , 1994, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[44]  M Stürzl,et al.  Liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma: clinical, histological and cell biological evaluation. , 1994, Research in virology.

[45]  R. Miller,et al.  Liposomal doxorubicin for treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. , 1993, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).