Post-processing of Docking Results: Tools and Strategies
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Iwata,et al. Structures of the 5-HT2A receptor in complex with the antipsychotics risperidone and zotepine , 2019, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.
[2] Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[3] Richard D. Taylor,et al. Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.
[4] Gennady M Verkhivker,et al. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.
[5] Jonathan D Hirst,et al. Machine learning in virtual screening. , 2009, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[6] Tom L. Blundell,et al. CREDO: a structural interactomics database for drug discovery , 2013, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.
[7] G. V. Paolini,et al. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[8] Eric J. Martin,et al. Surrogate AutoShim: Predocking into a Universal Ensemble Kinase Receptor for Three Dimensional Activity Prediction, Very Quickly, without a Crystal Structure , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[9] Tom L. Blundell,et al. Comprehensive, atomic-level characterization of structurally characterized protein-protein interactions: the PICCOLO database , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.
[10] S. Iwata,et al. Structures of the 5-HT2A receptor in complex with the antipsychotics risperidone and zotepine , 2019, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.
[11] Sean Ekins. The Next Era: Deep Learning in Pharmaceutical Research , 2016, Pharmaceutical Research.
[12] Obdulia Rabal,et al. APIF: A New Interaction Fingerprint Based on Atom Pairs and Its Application to Virtual Screening , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[13] C. Venkatachalam,et al. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[14] M. Murcko,et al. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[15] Chris de Graaf,et al. KLIFS: a structural kinase-ligand interaction database , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..
[16] John B. O. Mitchell. Machine learning methods in chemoinformatics , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science.
[17] I. Bruno,et al. Cambridge Structural Database , 2002 .
[18] Dariusz Plewczynski,et al. VoteDock: Consensus docking method for prediction of protein–ligand interactions , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..
[19] P. Hajduk,et al. Evaluation of PMF scoring in docking weak ligands to the FK506 binding protein. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[20] James M. Anderson,et al. Experimental versus predicted affinities for ligand binding to estrogen receptor: iterative selection and rescoring of docked poses systematically improves the correlation , 2013, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[21] Eric J. Martin,et al. AutoShim: Empirically Corrected Scoring Functions for Quantitative Docking with a Crystal Structure and IC50 Training Data , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[22] Huikun Zhang,et al. Machine Learning Consensus Scoring Improves Performance Across Targets in Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[23] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Three‐Dimensional Protein–Ligand Interaction Scaling of Two‐Dimensional Fingerprints , 2009, Chemical biology & drug design.
[24] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[25] I. Kuntz,et al. Inclusion of Solvation in Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations Using the Generalized-Born Model , 1999 .
[26] Tom L. Blundell,et al. BIPA: a database for protein-nucleic acid interaction in 3D structures , 2009, Bioinform..
[27] Jitender Verma,et al. 3D-QSAR in drug design--a review. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[28] Mark McGann,et al. FRED and HYBRID docking performance on standardized datasets , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[29] Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al. The computer program LUDI: A new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[30] Kwong-Sak Leung,et al. Improving AutoDock Vina Using Random Forest: The Growing Accuracy of Binding Affinity Prediction by the Effective Exploitation of Larger Data Sets , 2015, Molecular informatics.
[31] Ajay N. Jain. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[32] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. FLOG: A system to select ‘quasi-flexible’ ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[33] David Rogers,et al. Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[34] Gianni De Fabritiis,et al. KDEEP: Protein-Ligand Absolute Binding Affinity Prediction via 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[35] Zhihai Liu,et al. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[36] I. Kuntz,et al. Automated docking with grid‐based energy evaluation , 1992 .
[37] Jie Liu,et al. Classification of Current Scoring Functions , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[38] Thomas A. Halgren,et al. Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..
[39] Ruben Abagyan,et al. ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..
[40] Andrzej J. Bojarski,et al. Multi-Step Protocol for Automatic Evaluation of Docking Results Based on Machine Learning Methods - A Case Study of Serotonin Receptors 5-HT6 and 5-HT7 , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[41] H. Kitano,et al. Combining Machine Learning Systems and Multiple Docking Simulation Packages to Improve Docking Prediction Reliability for Network Pharmacology , 2013, PloS one.
[42] Yuguang Mu,et al. OnionNet: a Multiple-Layer Intermolecular-Contact-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction , 2019, ACS omega.
[43] D R Flower,et al. SERF: a program for accessible surface area calculations. , 1997, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[44] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. Molecular docking using shape descriptors , 1992 .
[45] Piotr Zielenkiewicz,et al. Open Drug Discovery Toolkit (ODDT): a new open-source player in the drug discovery field , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[46] Luhua Lai,et al. SCORE: A New Empirical Method for Estimating the Binding Affinity of a Protein-Ligand Complex , 1998 .
[47] G. Klebe,et al. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[48] M. Gilson,et al. A new class of models for computing receptor-ligand binding affinities. , 1997, Chemistry & biology.
[49] Natalia Artemenko,et al. Distance Dependent Scoring Function for Describing Protein-Ligand Intermolecular Interactions , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[50] Wei Deng,et al. Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities Using Novel Geometrical Descriptors and Machine-Learning Methods , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[51] C. Venkatachalam,et al. LigandFit: a novel method for the shape-directed rapid docking of ligands to protein active sites. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[52] C. Müller,et al. Crystal structure of the human ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73): insights into the regulation of purinergic signaling. , 2012, Structure.
[53] Luhua Lai,et al. Deep Learning for Drug-Induced Liver Injury , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[54] Frank M. Boeckler,et al. Evaluation and Optimization of Virtual Screening Workflows with DEKOIS 2.0 - A Public Library of Challenging Docking Benchmark Sets , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[55] A. Kukol. Consensus virtual screening approaches to predict protein ligands. , 2011, European journal of medicinal chemistry.
[56] Philip E. Bourne,et al. A Machine Learning-Based Method To Improve Docking Scoring Functions and Its Application to Drug Repurposing , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[57] Zhiwei Cao,et al. Proteochemometric Modeling of the Bioactivity Spectra of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors by Introducing Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprint , 2012, PloS one.
[58] Gilles Marcou,et al. Optimizing Fragment and Scaffold Docking by Use of Molecular Interaction Fingerprints , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[59] Pedro J. Ballester,et al. Performance of machine-learning scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[60] A. N. Jain,et al. Compass: predicting biological activities from molecular surface properties. Performance comparisons on a steroid benchmark. , 1994, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[61] Zhihai Liu,et al. Forging the Basis for Developing Protein-Ligand Interaction Scoring Functions. , 2017, Accounts of chemical research.
[62] Didier Rognan,et al. sc-PDB: a 3D-database of ligandable binding sites—10 years on , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..
[63] X Chen,et al. The binding database: overview and user's guide. , 2001, Biopolymers.
[64] Z. Deng,et al. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[65] Pierre Baldi,et al. Deep Architectures and Deep Learning in Chemoinformatics: The Prediction of Aqueous Solubility for Drug-Like Molecules , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[66] Alexios Koutsoukas,et al. Deep-learning: investigating deep neural networks hyper-parameters and comparison of performance to shallow methods for modeling bioactivity data , 2017, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[67] Teruki Honma,et al. Combining Machine Learning and Pharmacophore-Based Interaction Fingerprint for in Silico Screening , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[68] Sourav Das,et al. Binding Affinity Prediction with Property-Encoded Shape Distribution Signatures , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[69] John B. O. Mitchell,et al. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking , 2010, Bioinform..
[70] P. Hawkins,et al. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[71] Xiaofeng Liu,et al. SHAFTS: A Hybrid Approach for 3D Molecular Similarity Calculation. 1. Method and Assessment of Virtual Screening , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[72] A. Bonvin,et al. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking , 2010, Nature Protocols.
[73] Pedro J. Ballester,et al. Ultrafast shape recognition for similarity search in molecular databases , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[74] Gabriela Bitencourt-Ferreira,et al. Molegro Virtual Docker for Docking. , 2019, Methods in molecular biology.
[75] Johann Gasteiger,et al. The Coding of the Three-Dimensional Structure of Molecules by Molecular Transforms and Its Application to Structure-Spectra Correlations and Studies of Biological Activity , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[76] Patrick Bultinck,et al. The Electronegativity Equalization Method II: Applicability of Different Atomic Charge Schemes , 2002 .
[77] Andreas Mayr,et al. Deep Learning as an Opportunity in Virtual Screening , 2015 .
[78] Leo Breiman,et al. Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.
[79] Terry R. Stouch,et al. A simple method for the representation, quantification, and comparison of the volumes and shapes of chemical compounds , 1986, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[80] David S. Goodsell,et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[81] W. Graham Richards,et al. Ultrafast shape recognition to search compound databases for similar molecular shapes , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..
[82] Matthias Rarey,et al. Towards an Integrated Description of Hydrogen Bonding and Dehydration: Decreasing False Positives in Virtual Screening with the HYDE Scoring Function , 2008, ChemMedChem.
[83] Thomas G. Dietterich,et al. Compass: A shape-based machine learning tool for drug design , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[84] Olexandr Isayev,et al. Deep reinforcement learning for de novo drug design , 2017, Science Advances.
[85] Zsolt Zsoldos,et al. LASSO—ligand activity by surface similarity order: a new tool for ligand based virtual screening , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[86] Zhihai Liu,et al. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[87] Vladimir Vapnik,et al. Support-vector networks , 2004, Machine Learning.
[88] In-Wha Kim,et al. Deep learning: from chemoinformatics to precision medicine , 2017, Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation.
[89] George Papadatos,et al. Beyond the hype: deep neural networks outperform established methods using a ChEMBL bioactivity benchmark set , 2017, bioRxiv.
[90] B. Honig,et al. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.
[91] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Deep Neural Nets as a Method for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[92] G. S. Gill,et al. Molecular surface point environments for virtual screening and the elucidation of binding patterns (MOLPRINT) , 2004 .
[93] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[94] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[95] D S Goodsell,et al. Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of autodock , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[96] J. Bajorath,et al. Utilizing Target–Ligand Interaction Information in Fingerprint Searching for Ligands of Related Targets , 2009, Chemical biology & drug design.
[97] Dmitri B. Kireev,et al. Structural Protein–Ligand Interaction Fingerprints (SPLIF) for Structure-Based Virtual Screening: Method and Benchmark Study , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[98] A. N. Jain,et al. Quantitative binding site model generation: compass applied to multiple chemotypes targeting the 5-HT1A receptor. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[99] Hualiang Jiang,et al. Structural Basis for Molecular Recognition at Serotonin Receptors , 2013, Science.
[100] Marta M. Stepniewska-Dziubinska,et al. Development and evaluation of a deep learning model for protein–ligand binding affinity prediction , 2017, Bioinform..
[101] Jens Meiler,et al. Autocorrelation descriptor improvements for QSAR: 2DA_Sign and 3DA_Sign , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[102] Ming-Jing Hwang,et al. An interaction-motif-based scoring function for protein-ligand docking , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[103] Shuichi Hirono,et al. Comparison of Consensus Scoring Strategies for Evaluating Computational Models of Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[104] Tom L. Blundell,et al. USRCAT: real-time ultrafast shape recognition with pharmacophoric constraints , 2012, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[105] Bas Vroling,et al. GPCRdb: an information system for G protein-coupled receptors , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..
[106] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Pocketome: an encyclopedia of small-molecule binding sites in 4D , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..
[107] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[108] A. S. Nascimento,et al. MolShaCS: a free and open source tool for ligand similarity identification based on Gaussian descriptors. , 2013, European journal of medicinal chemistry.
[109] Ping Liu,et al. Crystal structure of the human 5-HT1B serotonin receptor bound to an inverse agonist , 2018, Cell Discovery.
[110] Michael M. Mysinger,et al. Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[111] Aniko Simon,et al. eHiTS: a new fast, exhaustive flexible ligand docking system. , 2007, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[112] Eugene I. Shakhnovich,et al. SMOG : DE NOVO DESIGN METHOD BASED ON SIMPLE, FAST, AND ACCURATE FREE ENERGY ESTIMATES. 2. CASE STUDIES IN MOLECULAR DESIGN , 1997 .