An analytical framework for strategic delta planning: negotiating consent for long-term sustainable delta development

Sectoral planning on water, agriculture and urban development has not been able to prevent increased flood risks and environmental degradation in many deltas. Governments conceive strategic delta planning as a promising planning approach and develop strategic delta plans. Such plans are linked to actions and means for implementation in the short-term, in line with long-term strategic choices. This paper introduces an analytical framework that focuses on the role of actors, innovative solutions and participatory planning tools in negotiating consent for the strategic choices in a delta plan and its implementation. Cases of Bangladesh, the Netherlands and Vietnam are discussed as a plausibility probe to explore the framework's potential. The probe reveals that the framework is promising to explain the process and outcomes of strategic delta planning in urbanizing deltas. The paper ends with an initial research agenda to stimulate research and discussion on this new delta planning approach.

[1]  Helen Briassoulis,et al.  Theoretical orientations in environmental planning: An inquiry into alternative approaches , 1989 .

[2]  John Day,et al.  Climate change: Protect the world's deltas , 2014, Nature.

[3]  W. F. van Driel,et al.  Comparative assessment of the vulnerability and resilience of deltas , 2014 .

[4]  Thomas Hartmann,et al.  Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: Planning as expectation management , 2012 .

[5]  C. Weible,et al.  The Advocacy Coalition Framework , 2012, Theories of the Policy Process.

[6]  E. Ostrom.  Institutional Rational Choice , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[7]  Tim Richardson,et al.  Exclusion: the necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus , 2004 .

[8]  Wesley E. Highfield,et al.  Does Planning Work?: Testing the Implementation of Local Environmental Planning in Florida , 2005 .

[9]  P. Checkland.  Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective a , 2000 .

[10]  Alice Newton,et al.  Catalyzing action towards the sustainability of deltas , 2016 .

[11]  Stan C. M. Geertman,et al.  Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[12]  R. Nicholls,et al.  The Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna delta system: biophysical models to support analysis of ecosystem services and poverty alleviation. , 2015, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[13]  R. Chandler,et al.  Recent trends in groundwater levels in a highly seasonal hydrological system: the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta , 2009 .

[14]  H. Kreibich,et al.  Adaptive flood risk management planning based on a comprehensive flood risk conceptualisation , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[15]  Claudia Kuenzer,et al.  Climate and Environmental Change in River Deltas Globally: Expected Impacts, Resilience, and Adaptation , 2012 .

[16]  A. Fenna,et al.  Wicked Problems in Public Policy , 2009 .

[17]  L. Susskind,et al.  The consensus building handbook : a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement , 1999 .

[18]  Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat.  Reflections on the Three Schools of Thought on Strategic Spatial Planning , 2015 .

[19]  P. Healey.  The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe , 2004 .

[20]  Patsy Healey,et al.  In Search of the “Strategic” in Spatial Strategy Making1 , 2009 .

[21]  W. Bijker.  How is Technology Made?-That is the Question! , 2010 .

[22]  N. Röling,et al.  Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning , 2007 .

[23]  Alessandro Balducci,et al.  Practicing Strategic Planning: In Search of Critical Features to Explain the Strategic Character of Plans , 2013 .

[24]  I. Overeem,et al.  Sinking deltas due to human activities , 2009 .

[25]  I. Otto,et al.  Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change , 2013 .

[26]  P. Leroy,et al.  How the Second Delta Committee Set the Agenda for Climate Change Adaptation: A Dutch Case Study on Framing Strategies for Policy Change , 2012 .

[27]  Catrien J.A.M. Termeer,et al.  Changing climate, changing frames Dutch water policy frame developments in the context of a rise and fall of attention to climate change , 2013 .

[28]  T. Cochrane,et al.  Historical impact of water infrastructure on water levels of the Mekong River and the Tonle Sap system , 2014 .

[29]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[30]  P. Berke,et al.  What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers , 2004 .

[31]  M. Marchand,et al.  Comparitive assessment of the vulnerability and resilience of 10 deltas, synthesis report , 2010 .

[32]  Giorgos Kallis,et al.  Collectively engaging complex socio-ecological systems: re-envisioning science, governance, and the California Delta , 2009 .

[33]  John Friedmann,et al.  Strategic spatial planning and the longer range , 2004 .

[34]  Jonathan M. Gilligan,et al.  Flood risk of natural and embanked landscapes on the Ganges–Brahmaputra tidal delta plain , 2015 .

[35]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[36]  Ho Long Phi,et al.  A framework to assess plan implementation maturity with an application to flood management in Vietnam , 2015 .

[37]  Frederiek Sperna Weiland,et al.  The Delta Model for Fresh Water Policy Analysis in the Netherlands , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[38]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1991 .

[39]  S. Geertman,et al.  New Technologies Stuck in Old Hierarchies: The Diffusion of Geo‐Information Technologies in Dutch Public Organizations , 2007 .

[40]  K. Nguyen,et al.  Measuring household resilience to floods: A case study in the Vietnamese Mekong River Delta , 2013 .

[41]  Claudia Kuenzer,et al.  Tipping from the Holocene to the Anthropocene: How threatened are major world deltas? , 2013 .

[42]  Saskia Elisabeth Werners,et al.  Method selection in adaptation research: the case of the Delta Programme for the Dutch Wadden region , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[43]  Buu-Long Nguyen,et al.  Regional Sediment Deficits in the Dutch Lowlands: Implications for Long-Term Land-Use Options (8 pp) , 2007 .

[44]  Christian Pohl,et al.  Transdisciplinary collaboration in environmental research , 2005 .

[45]  Robert J. Nicholls,et al.  Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: regional and global analyses , 1999 .

[46]  M. J. Stive,et al.  Working together with water : A living land builds for its future , 2008 .

[47]  Louis Albrechts,et al.  Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined , 2004 .

[48]  Geert Teisman,et al.  Models For Research into Decision-MakingProcesses: On Phases, Streams and Decision-Making Rounds , 2000 .

[49]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[50]  Dylan M. Beach,et al.  Scenario planning during rapid ecological change: lessons and perspectives from workshops with southwest Yukon wildlife managers , 2015 .

[51]  J. Innes.  Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal , 1996 .

[52]  Robert T. Nakamura,et al.  THE TEXTBOOK POLICY PROCESS AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH , 1987 .

[53]  Emily Talen,et al.  Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning , 1996 .

[54]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[55]  Andreas Faludi,et al.  The Performance of Spatial Planning , 2000 .

[56]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Information, public empowerment, and the management of urban watersheds , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[57]  P. Leroy,et al.  The Dutch Delta Committee as a boundary organisation , 2013 .