Do Hostile Opinion Environments Harm Political Participation? The Moderating Role of Generalized Social Trust

This article attempts to reevaluate the democratic implications of opinion diversity by showing that politically hostile social networks do not necessarily discourage political participation. It is theorized that generalized social trust, as an individual differences variable, can explain how individuals expect others to behave when deviating opinions are voiced. In contrast to high social trust individuals, low trust individuals believe others will react negatively to such dissent. Thus, it is hypothesized that low trust individuals refrain from participation when confronted with a hostile social network. Using U.S. representative survey data, Study 1 confirms that a demobilizing effect of hostile networks can only be observed for lower levels of social trust. Study 2 replicates this finding with an online survey addressing the underlying mechanism in a mediated moderation analysis. It is shown that social trust fuels behavioral expectations about how others will react to dissent. These expectations, in turn, explain how hostile networks dampen participation.

[1]  Thomas Rotolo,et al.  Town Heterogeneity and Affiliation: A Multilevel Analysis of Voluntary Association Membership , 2000 .

[2]  Diana C. Mutz The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[3]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  Pattern and growth in personality , 1961 .

[4]  Daniel J Bauer,et al.  Probing Interactions in Fixed and Multilevel Regression: Inferential and Graphical Techniques , 2005, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  Young Min Baek,et al.  Deliberative and Participatory Democracy? Ideological Strength and the Processes Leading from Deliberation to Political Engagement , 2010 .

[6]  Mark E. Warren,et al.  Democracy and Trust , 1999 .

[7]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[8]  Jörg Matthes,et al.  Exposure to Counterattitudinal News Coverage and the Timing of Voting Decisions , 2012, Commun. Res..

[9]  J. Rotter A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[10]  N. Luhmann Trust and Power , 1979 .

[11]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[12]  Magdalena Wojcieszak,et al.  “Carrying Online Participation Offline”-Mobilization by Radical Online Groups and Politically Dissimilar Offline Ties , 2009 .

[13]  Yariv Tsfati,et al.  Exploring Possible Correlates of Journalists' Perceptions of Audience Trust , 2004 .

[14]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Cautions Regarding the Interpretation of Regression Coefficients and Hypothesis Tests in Linear Models with Interactions , 2012 .

[15]  Joseph N. Cappella,et al.  Do People Watch what they Do Not Trust? , 2003, Commun. Res..

[16]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Nature, Meaning, and Measurement of Trust , 2000 .

[17]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[18]  A. Hayes Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[19]  W. H. Jones,et al.  The assessment of trust orientation. , 1996, Journal of personality assessment.

[20]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .

[21]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  The Contested Role of Heterogeneity in Collective Action: Some Evidence from Community Forestry in Nepal , 2001 .

[22]  Ken'ichi Ikeda,et al.  Patterns of Disagreement in Democratic Politics: Comparing Germany, Japan, and the United States , 2005 .

[23]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Oxytocin increases trust in humans , 2005, Nature.

[24]  E. Mulvey,et al.  Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[26]  Geoffrey C. Layman Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact of Beliefs, Affiliations, and Commitment from 1980 to 1994 , 1997 .

[27]  Hoon Lee,et al.  Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: , 2005, Commun. Res..

[28]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  On the Edge or In Between: Niche Position, Niche Overlap, and the Duration of Voluntary Association Memberships , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Campaign Mixed-Message Flows and Timing of Vote Decision , 2008 .

[30]  E. Uslaner Trust, Civic Engagement, and the Internet , 2004 .

[31]  E. Uslaner Where You Stand Depends Upon Where Your Grandparents Sat The Inheritability of Generalized Trust , 2008 .

[32]  David P Mackinnon,et al.  Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[33]  E. Noelle-Neumann The Spiral of Silence A Theory of Public Opinion , 1974 .

[34]  Lilach Nir,et al.  Disagreement and Opposition in Social Networks: Does Disagreement Discourage Turnout? , 2011 .

[35]  Eric M. Uslaner,et al.  Democracy and Trust: Democracy and social capital , 1999 .

[36]  Hernando Rojas,et al.  Strategy Versus Understanding , 2008, Commun. Res..

[37]  G. Simmel The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[38]  Joseph N. Cappella,et al.  Cynicism and Social Trust in the New Media Environment , 2002 .

[39]  Mira Sotirovic, Jack M. McLeod Values, Communication Behavior, and Political Participation , 2001 .

[40]  Jörg Matthes,et al.  Trust in News Media , 2007, Commun. Res..

[41]  Bryan M. Parsons,et al.  Social Networks and the Affective Impact of Political Disagreement , 2010 .

[42]  H. Eysenck Dimensions of Personality , 1947 .

[43]  Ron Johnston,et al.  Conversation, Disagreement and Political Participation , 2009 .

[44]  A. Seligman The Problem of Trust , 2021 .

[45]  Magdalena Wojcieszak,et al.  Pulling Toward or Pulling Away: Deliberation, Disagreement, and Opinion Extremity in Political Participation , 2011 .

[46]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[47]  F. Fukuyama Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity Penguin London , 1995 .

[48]  Hernando Rojas “Corrective” Actions in the Public Sphere: How Perceptions of Media and Media Effects Shape Political Behaviors , 2010 .

[49]  Joseph N. Cappella,et al.  Why Do People Watch News They Do Not Trust? The Need for Cognition as a Moderator in the Association Between News Media Skepticism and Exposure , 2005 .

[50]  A. Alesina,et al.  Participation in Heterogeneous Communities , 1999 .

[51]  Lilach Nir,et al.  Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation , 2005 .

[52]  Scott D. McClurg,et al.  Political Disagreement in Context: The Conditional Effect of Neighborhood Context, Disagreement and Political Talk on Electoral Participation , 2006 .

[53]  Cristian Vaccari,et al.  Social Networks, Political Discussion, and Voting in Italy: A Study of the 2006 Election , 2008 .

[54]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[55]  C. Funk,et al.  Conflict Avoidance and Political Participation , 1999 .

[56]  Jörg Matthes,et al.  A Spiral of Silence for Some: Attitude Certainty and the Expression of Political Minority Opinions , 2010, Commun. Res..

[57]  Morris Rosenberg,et al.  MISANTHROPY AND POLITICAL IDEOLOGY , 1956 .

[58]  E. Erikson Childhood and Society , 1965 .