Production data analysis of unconventional gas wells: Workflow

Abstract Production data analysis techniques for unconventional reservoirs are in their infancy. These techniques continue to evolve according to our improved understanding of the physics of fluid storage and flow. Analytical methods, which include type-curves, flow-regime analysis and analytical simulation, have recently been modified to account for desorption of gas, multi-phase flow, non-Darcy flow (slip flow and diffusion), and non-static (stress-dependent) permeability. Further, adaptations have been made to account for complex wellbore and hydraulic fracture geometries encountered in some developments. Empirical methods, including the popular Arps decline-curve methodology, have been adopted to account for long-term transient and transitional flow associated with some unconventional plays. New empirical methods have been developed to address the limitations of the Arps curves. Unlike conventional reservoirs, however, where decades of application have led to “rules of thumb” and guidance for decline parameter ranges that can be used for different reservoir and production scenarios, application of empirical techniques to unconventional reservoirs can lead to significant uncertainty in production forecasts. In this article, a workflow is described for the integrated use of analytical and empirical production data analysis methods for the purpose of: 1) reservoir and hydraulic fracture characterization and 2) production forecasting/reserves determination. Details of the methodologies are provided in an accompanying review article ( Clarkson, 2013 ). It is recommended that newly-developed empirical techniques not be applied on their own, and that decline parameters should be adjusted to match production forecasts generated using analytical techniques. Analytical methods better (although still imperfectly) account for the physics of fluid flow and storage in unconventional reservoirs, and can account for operational changes during the life of a well. Examples of the workflow are provided using a simulated and field example.

[1]  Jay Alan Rushing,et al.  A Production-Based Method for Direct Estimation of Gas-in-Place and Reserves , 2005 .

[2]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Integration of microseismic and other post-fracture surveillance with production analysis: A tight gas study , 2011 .

[3]  Louis Mattar,et al.  Tight Gas Production Performance Using Decline Curves , 2008 .

[4]  Ahmed H. El-Banbi,et al.  Production Analysis of Linear Flow Into Fractured Tight Gas Wells , 1998 .

[5]  Jay Alan Rushing,et al.  Beyond Decline Curves: Life-Cycle Reserves Appraisal Using an Integrated Work-Flow Process for Tight Gas Sands , 2007 .

[6]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Effect of Heterogeneity in a Horizontal Well With Multiple Fractures on the Long-Term Forecast in Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2011 .

[7]  Danial Kaviani,et al.  New type curves for analyzing horizontal well with multiple fractures in shale gas reservoirs , 2013 .

[8]  John Seidle,et al.  Fundamentals of Coalbed Methane Reservoir Engineering , 2011 .

[9]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  A New Analytical Method for Analyzing Linear Flow in Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs: Constant-Flowing-Pressure Boundary Condition , 2012 .

[10]  J. J. Arps Analysis of Decline Curves , 1945 .

[11]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  A New Analytical Method for Analyzing Linear Flow in Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs: Constant-Rate Boundary Condition , 2012 .

[12]  Jay Alan Rushing,et al.  Applicability of the Arps Rate-Time Relationships for Evaluating Decline Behavior and Ultimate Gas Recovery of Coalbed Methane Wells , 2008 .

[13]  Dilhan Ilk,et al.  Integrating Multiple Production Analysis Techniques To Assess Tight Gas Sand Reserves: Defining a New Paradigm for Industry Best Practices , 2008 .

[14]  Dilhan Ilk,et al.  Production-Data Analysis—Challenges, Pitfalls, Diagnostics , 2010 .

[15]  Peter P. Valko,et al.  Assigning value to stimulation in the Barnett Shale: a simultaneous analysis of 7000 plus production hystories and well completion records , 2009 .

[16]  C. Clarkson Modeling 2-Phase Flowback of Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells Completed in Shale , 2012 .

[17]  Danial Kaviani,et al.  Production Analysis of Tight-Gas and Shale-Gas Reservoirs Using the Dynamic-Slippage Concept , 2012 .

[18]  Peter P. Valko,et al.  A Better Way To Forecast Production From Unconventional Gas Wells , 2010 .

[19]  Dilhan Ilk,et al.  Exponential vs. Hyperbolic Decline in Tight Gas Sands: Understanding the Origin and Implications for Reserve Estimates Using Arps' Decline Curves , 2008 .

[20]  M. J. Fetkovich Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves , 1980 .

[21]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Production data analysis of unconventional gas wells: Review of theory and best practices , 2013 .

[22]  Samane Moghadam,et al.  Simplified Yet Rigorous Forecasting of Tight/Shale Gas Production in Linear Flow , 2010 .

[23]  Louis Mattar,et al.  Comparison of Power Law and Modified Hyperbolic Decline Methods , 2010 .