Designing Automated, High-throughput, Continuous Cell Growth Experiments Using eVOLVER.

Continuous culture methods enable cells to be grown under quantitatively controlled environmental conditions, and are thus broadly useful for measuring fitness phenotypes and improving our understanding of how genotypes are shaped by selection. Extensive recent efforts to develop and apply niche continuous culture devices have revealed the benefits of conducting new forms of cell culture control. This includes defining custom selection pressures and increasing throughput for studies ranging from long-term experimental evolution to genome-wide library selections and synthetic gene circuit characterization. The eVOLVER platform was recently developed to meet this growing demand: a continuous culture platform with a high degree of scalability, flexibility, and automation. eVOLVER provides a single standardizing platform that can be (re)-configured and scaled with minimal effort to perform many different types of high-throughput or multi-dimensional growth selection experiments. Here, a protocol is presented to provide users of the eVOLVER framework a description for configuring the system to conduct a custom, large-scale continuous growth experiment. Specifically, the protocol guides users on how to program the system to multiplex two selection pressures - temperature and osmolarity - across many eVOLVER vials in order to quantify fitness landscapes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants at fine resolution. We show how the device can be configured both programmatically, through its open-source web-based software, and physically, by arranging fluidic and hardware layouts. The process of physically setting up the device, programming the culture routine, monitoring and interacting with the experiment in real-time over the internet, sampling vials for subsequent offline analysis, and post experiment data analysis are detailed. This should serve as a starting point for researchers across diverse disciplines to apply eVOLVER in the design of their own complex and high-throughput cell growth experiments to study and manipulate biological systems.

[1]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  Pervasive Genetic Hitchhiking and Clonal Interference in 40 Evolving Yeast Populations , 2013, Nature.

[2]  Arjun Ravikumar,et al.  Scalable, Continuous Evolution of Genes at Mutation Rates above Genomic Error Thresholds , 2018, Cell.

[3]  D. Raoult,et al.  Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics , 2018, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[4]  David Gresham,et al.  The enduring utility of continuous culturing in experimental evolution. , 2014, Genomics.

[5]  Jeffrey E. Barrick,et al.  Adaptation, Clonal Interference, and Frequency-Dependent Interactions in a Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli , 2015, Genetics.

[6]  Andre B. Bondi,et al.  Characteristics of scalability and their impact on performance , 2000, WOSP '00.

[7]  Brandon G Wong,et al.  Precise, automated control of conditions for high-throughput growth of yeast and bacteria with eVOLVER , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Remy Chait,et al.  Evolutionary paths to antibiotic resistance under dynamically sustained drug selection , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[9]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  Chromosomal duplication is a transient evolutionary solution to stress , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. Shendure,et al.  Selection analyses of insertional mutants using subgenic-resolution arrays , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  J. Pronk,et al.  Reproducibility of Oligonucleotide Microarray Transcriptome Analyses , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  J. Monod The Growth of Bacterial Cultures , 1949 .

[13]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Genetic circuit performance under conditions relevant for industrial bioreactors. , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[14]  Daniel S. Yuan,et al.  Probing Nucleosome Function: A Highly Versatile Library of Synthetic Histone H3 and H4 Mutants , 2008, Cell.

[15]  M. Khammash,et al.  Automated optogenetic feedback control for precise and robust regulation of gene expression and cell growth , 2016, Nature Communications.

[16]  Remy Chait,et al.  Building a morbidostat: an automated continuous-culture device for studying bacterial drug resistance under dynamically sustained drug inhibition. , 2013, Nature protocols.

[17]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[18]  T. Fukami Historical Contingency in Community Assembly: Integrating Niches, Species Pools, and Priority Effects , 2015 .

[19]  Mikhail Tikhonov,et al.  Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly , 2017, Science.

[20]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  Design and Use of Multiplexed Chemostat Arrays , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[21]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Hunger Artists: Yeast Adapted to Carbon Limitation Show Trade-Offs under Carbon Sufficiency , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[22]  Eric Klavins,et al.  A Low Cost, Customizable Turbidostat for Use in Synthetic Circuit Characterization , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[23]  Nicholas T Ingolia,et al.  An Accessible Continuous-Culture Turbidostat for Pooled Analysis of Complex Libraries. , 2019, ACS synthetic biology.

[24]  David R. Liu,et al.  Negative selection and stringency modulation in phage-assisted constinuous evolution , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[25]  Alan T. Bull,et al.  The renaissance of continuous culture in the post-genomics age , 2010, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[26]  R. Britton,et al.  Cultivation of stable, reproducible microbial communities from different fecal donors using minibioreactor arrays (MBRAs) , 2015, Microbiome.

[27]  David Botstein,et al.  Yeast metabolic and signaling genes are required for heat-shock survival and have little overlap with the heat-induced genes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  Experimental Evolution Reveals Favored Adaptive Routes to Cell Aggregation in Yeast , 2016, Genetics.

[29]  Hal S Alper,et al.  In vivo continuous evolution of genes and pathways in yeast , 2016, Nature Communications.

[30]  Matthew J. Brauer,et al.  Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[31]  A. Novick,et al.  Experiments with the Chemostat on spontaneous mutations of bacteria. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  David M. Auslander,et al.  Dynamics of interacting populations , 1974 .

[33]  Jonathan Friedman,et al.  Ecological systems biology: The dynamics of interacting populations , 2017 .

[34]  Pei Yee Ho,et al.  Multiple High-Throughput Analyses Monitor the Response of E. coli to Perturbations , 2007, Science.

[35]  Maitreya J. Dunham,et al.  Differential paralog divergence modulates genome evolution across yeast species , 2017, PLoS genetics.

[36]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Molecular Characterization of Clonal Interference during Adaptive Evolution in Asexual Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[37]  David Gresham,et al.  The use of chemostats in microbial systems biology. , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[38]  J. R. Lambers Faculty of 1000 evaluation for Historical Contingency in Community Assembly: Integrating Niches, Species Pools, and Priority Effects. , 2016 .

[39]  David R. Liu,et al.  A System for the Continuous Directed Evolution of Biomolecules , 2011, Nature.