Better Instructions for Use to Improve Reusable Medical Equipment (RME) Sterility

Objective: The objective was to evaluate human-factors-based instructional aids on endoscope reprocessing. Background: The project stems from recent failures in reprocessing (cleaning) endoscopes, contributing to the spread of harmful bacterial and viral agents between patients. A previous study discovered three themes that represent a majority of problems: (1) lack of visibility (parts and tools were difficult to identify), (2) high memory demands, and (3) insufficient feedback. Method: In an effort to improve completion rate and reduce error, the authors designed instructional aids utilizing human factors principles that would replace existing manufacturer-provided visual aids. Then, they conducted a usability test, which compared the endoscope reprocessing performance of novices using the standard manufacturer-provided visual aids and the new instructional aids. Results: Participants in the experimental group successfully completed 87.1% of the reprocessing procedure with the use of the instructional aids, compared to 44.7% in the control group using only existing support materials. Of 60 subtasks, 27 showed significant improvement in completion rates. Conclusion: When given an instructional aid designed with human factors principles, participants were able to more successfully complete the reprocessing task. This resulted in an endoscope that was more likely to be safe for use on patients. Application: The human factors design elements utilized to create the instructional aids could be transferred to a dynamic electronic-based system to improve patient safety.

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics , 1994, CHI '94.

[2]  William A Rutala,et al.  Disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities: what clinicians need to know. , 2004, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[3]  Robert Garland,et al.  American College of Chest Physicians and American Association for Bronchology Consensus Statement , 2005, Chest.

[4]  S. Greenberg,et al.  The Psychology of Everyday Things , 2012 .

[5]  K. Sugano,et al.  Pitfalls in endoscope reprocessing: brushing of air and water channels is mandatory for high-level disinfection. , 2001, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  Deane B. Judd,et al.  FACTS OF COLOR-BLINDNESS , 1944 .

[7]  T. B. Garland,et al.  Patient Safety and Endoscope Reprocessing: A Usability Test of the Reprocessing Procedure , 2011 .

[8]  W A Rutala,et al.  Lessons From Outbreaks Associated With Bronchoscopy , 2001, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  T. B. Garland,et al.  Exploring Human Factors in Endoscope Reprocessing , 2010 .

[10]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  W. Rutala,et al.  Draft Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities , 2002 .

[12]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[13]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .