Life cycle inventory analysis of fresh tomato distribution systems in Japan considering the quality aspect

Abstract Life cycle of fresh tomato was evaluated to determine CO 2 emissions during its cultivation and distribution. Low temperature (LT) and modified-atmosphere packaging (MAP) were compared for their effect on quality. Road and sea transport were also compared. The method of cultivation and transport and the distribution systems affected the overall life cycle inventory (LCI, CO 2 emissions). Life cycle inventory was larger for greenhouse produce than for that raised under plastic cover and larger for produce transported by road than for that transported by sea. The distance between production and consumption area affected the LCI significantly. It is worthwhile to note that MAP would not be environmentally acceptable over LT packaging in the case of tomatoes transported by road over a distance shorter than 2000 km although such transport does not require any cooling during transport and storage: MAP would be a better option in the case of sea transport beyond 1000 km. The distance over which MAP is the better option is thus dependent on the mode of transport because the two modes of transport differ in speed and, therefore, in emissions. A change in cultivation from greenhouse to plastic cover, in transport from road to sea, and in packaging from LT to MAP is required to minimize the LCI and would abate approximately 0.14–0.24 million tonnes of CO 2 emissions a year from Japan.

[1]  K. Green,et al.  The environmental impacts of food production and consumption , 2006 .

[2]  Alan Greer,et al.  Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries , 2004 .

[3]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[4]  A. Carlsson-kanyama Climate change and dietary choices -- how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? , 1998 .

[5]  Juan Ignacio Montero,et al.  LCA and tomato production in Mediterranean greenhouses , 2005 .

[6]  Andrew Flynn,et al.  Environmental impacts of food production and consumption: a report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs by Manchester Business School , 2007 .

[7]  C. Cederberg,et al.  Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farming , 2000 .

[8]  Thomas Ohlsson,et al.  Screening life cycle assessment (LCA) of tomato ketchup : A case study , 1998 .

[9]  R. E. Hardenburg,et al.  The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks , 1986 .

[10]  G. Stanhill The energy cost of protected cropping: a comparison of six systems of tomato production. , 1980 .

[11]  Karin Andersson,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of food products and production systems , 1994 .

[12]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production , 2003 .