The Impact of Organizational Structure on Internal and External Integration: An Empirical, Cross-Regional Assessment

We examine the effects of organizational structure on cross-functional integration, supplier integration, and customer integration and assess whether such effects vary by geographical region. Specifically, we investigate the impact of centralization, formalization, and complexity on both internal (cross-functional) and external (supplier, customer) integration. Relationships are examined across Western and East Asian environments using data collected from 238 manufacturing plants in eight countries. We find that structural features have differing impacts on cross-functional, supplier, and customer integration, and these effects vary across geographical regions.

[1]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Inter-organizational Bonds and Intra-organizational Behavior: How Alliances and Partnerships Change the Organizations Forming Them , 1991 .

[2]  David Miller.  Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance , 1987 .

[3]  K. Zhou,et al.  Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation , 2009 .

[4]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[5]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, INTEGRATION, AND MANUFACTURING PERFORMANCE: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL AND PROPOSITIONS , 2012 .

[6]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. , 1982 .

[7]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  The impact of organizational structure on the level of JIT attainment: Towards theory development , 1998 .

[8]  J. Fredrickson.  The Strategic Decision Process and Organizational Structure , 1986 .

[9]  Kee-hung Lai,et al.  An empirical assessment of a nomological network of organizational design constructs: From culture to structure to pull production to performance , 2007 .

[10]  P. Drnevich,et al.  Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance , 2011 .

[11]  Frank M. Hull,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: Beyond Burns and Stalker's Organic Type , 1982 .

[12]  Mikko Ketokivi,et al.  The Contingent Value of Organizational Integration , 2013 .

[13]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[14]  K. Lai,et al.  “Black‐box” and “gray‐box” supplier integration in product development: Antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size , 2007 .

[15]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  High performance manufacturing : global perspectives , 2001 .

[16]  Tobias Schoenherr,et al.  Revisiting the arcs of integration: Cross-validations and extensions , 2012 .

[17]  M. Terziovski.  Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource‐based view , 2010 .

[18]  M. Frohlich,et al.  Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies , 2001 .

[19]  F. Dwyer,et al.  Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships , 1987 .

[20]  T. Kostova,et al.  Social Capital in Multinational Corporations and a Micro-Macro Model of its Formation , 2003 .

[21]  Xiaohua Lin,et al.  Organizational structure, context, customer orientation, and performance: lessons from Chinese state‐owned enterprises , 2003 .

[22]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[23]  Danny Miller,et al.  Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit , 1992 .

[24]  Thomas Li-Ping Tang,et al.  Learning from Japanese Transplants and American Corporations , 1995 .

[25]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  The impact of organizational structure on time-based manufacturing and plant performance , 2003 .

[26]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Mikko Ketokivi,et al.  Cross‐functional integration and performance: what are the real benefits? , 2012 .

[28]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[29]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis , 1966 .

[30]  M. Tushman,et al.  Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents , 1981 .

[31]  David R. Brodwin,et al.  Strategic implementation: Five approaches to an elusive phenomenon , 1984 .

[32]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Structure on Mass Customization Capability: A Contingency View , 2010 .

[34]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  PERSPECTIVE - The Sociological Ambivalence of Bureaucracy: From Weber via Gouldner to Marx , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[35]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[36]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .