Calibration Time Reduction Using Subjective Features Selection Based Transfer Learning For Multiclass BCI

Brain-computer interface (BCI) using machine learning has the requirement for a large number of training data. This requirement makes the long training session inevitable for a new user. Many approaches including transfer learning (TL) already have been reported in the literature to abridge the long training data collection session. One of them is transferring informative instances using active learning (AL) which was approached in our previous attempts for both binary and multiclass BCI. It was associated with the classic common spatial pattern (CSP) feature extraction method. It showed the potential to obtain the benchmark performance using a reduced amount of training data. However, it has subject dependent performance and was not up to the expectation particularly for multiclass BCI. For binary BCI, it is addressed by selecting the best subject-specific features from subjective narrow frequency window using filter bank CSP (FBCSP). Since multiclass BCI has different characteristics in terms of output performance and nature of features, this work investigates the incorporation of FBCSP into informative transfer learning with AL (ITAL) for multiclass BCI. Comparing with existing direct transfer with AL (DTAL) and ITAL with CSP for multiclass BCI, ITAL with FBCSP reaches the benchmark performance for six out of nine subjects using average 42% of the full training set which is significant at 5% (p < 0.05) significance level. For multiclass BCI as well, ITAL combined with discriminating feature extraction ensures better transfer which yields to effective reduction of the training session without sacrificing the benchmark robustness.

[1]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Active transfer learning and selective instance transfer with active learning for motor imagery based BCI , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[2]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  The Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Non-Medical Uses of BCI Technology , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Weighted informative inverse active class selection for motor imagery brain computer interface , 2017, 2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE).

[4]  Brent Lance,et al.  Transfer learning and active transfer learning for reducing calibration data in single-trial classification of visually-evoked potentials , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[5]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in Brain-Computer Interface , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[7]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[8]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The non-invasive Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[9]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Mu and Beta Rhythm Topographies During Motor Imagery and Actual Movements , 2004, Brain Topography.

[10]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Multiclass Informative Instance Transfer Learning Framework for Motor Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface , 2018, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[11]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  EEG signal classification for BCI applications by wavelets and interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Designing optimal spatial filters for single-trial EEG classification in a movement task , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Informative instance transfer learning with subject specific frequency responses for motor imagery brain computer interface , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[14]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Motor Imagery Data Classification for BCI Application Using Wavelet Packet Feature Extraction , 2014, ICONIP.

[15]  Roberto Battiti,et al.  Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[17]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Two-Dimensional Linear Discriminant Analysis , 2004, NIPS.

[18]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[19]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[20]  R. Leeb,et al.  BCI Competition 2008 { Graz data set B , 2008 .

[21]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Increase Information Transfer Rates in BCI by CSP Extension to Multi-class , 2003, NIPS.

[22]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Transfer Learning in Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2015, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[23]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[25]  Brent Lance,et al.  Reducing Offline BCI Calibration Effort Using Weighted Adaptation Regularization with Source Domain Selection , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[26]  William Cyrus Navidi,et al.  Statistics for Engineers and Scientists , 2004 .

[27]  Burr Settles,et al.  Active Learning Literature Survey , 2009 .