The climate effect of increased forest bioenergy use in Sweden: evaluation at different spatial and temporal scales

Bioenergy from boreal forests managed for productive purposes (e.g., pulp, timber) is commonly held to offer attractive options for climate change mitigation. However, this view has been challenged in recent years. Carbon balances, cumulative radiative forcing, and average global temperature change have been calculated for a variety of bioenergy management regimes in Swedish forests and the results support the view that an increased use of forest biomass for energy in Sweden can contribute to climate change mitigation, although methodological (e.g. spatial scales) and parameter value choices influence the results significantly. We show that the climate effect of forest-based bioenergy depends on the forest ecosystems and management, including biomass extraction for bioenergy and other products, and how this management changes in response to anticipated market demands; and on the energy system effects, which determine the fossil carbon displacement and other greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation effects of using forest biomass for bioenergy and other purposes. The public and private sectors are advised to consider information from comprehensive analyses that provide insights about energy and forest systems in the context of evolving forest product markets, alternative policy options, and energy technology pathways in their decision-making processes.

[1]  M. Gusti,et al.  Projection of the future EU forest CO2 sink as affected by recent bioenergy policies using two advanced forest management models , 2012 .

[2]  G. Marland,et al.  Full fuel cycle carbon balances of bioenergy and forestry options. , 1996 .

[3]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Bioenergy from forestry and changes in atmospheric CO2: reconciling single stand and landscape level approaches. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Lars Zetterberg,et al.  The time aspect of bioenergy – climate impacts of solid biofuels due to carbon dynamics , 2015 .

[5]  Uwe A. Schneider,et al.  Price of CO2 emissions and use of wood in Europe , 2012 .

[6]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[7]  Dan Gavrilescu,et al.  ENERGY FROM BIOMASS IN PULP AND PAPER MILLS , 2008 .

[8]  G. Peters,et al.  Simple emission metrics for climate impacts , 2013 .

[9]  P. Leitão,et al.  Drivers of forest harvesting intensity patterns in Europe , 2014 .

[10]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Potential effects of intensive forestry on biomass production and total carbon balance in north-central Sweden. , 2012 .

[11]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Trend in efficiency and capacity of fossil power generation in the EU , 2009 .

[12]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Primary energy and greenhouse gas implications of increasing biomass production through forest fertilization , 2010 .

[13]  Bjart Holtsmark.  Material for : Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt , 2011 .

[14]  A. Lundström,et al.  Simulation of the Effect of Intensive Forest Management on Forest Production in Sweden , 2011 .

[15]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Global climate impacts of forest bioenergy: what, when and how to measure? , 2013 .

[16]  J. Alavalapati,et al.  MODELING IMPACTS OF BIOENERGY MARKETS ON NONINDUSTRIAL PRIVATE FOREST MANAGEMENT IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES , 2009 .

[17]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Theoretical ecosystem ecology : understanding element cycles , 1996 .

[18]  Masson-Delmotte,et al.  The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[19]  Jesse D. Henderson,et al.  Effect of policy-based bioenergy demand on southern timber markets: A case study of North Carolina , 2010 .

[20]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Global outlook for wood and forests with the bioenergy demand implied by scenarios of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2010 .

[21]  Tobias Stern,et al.  Energy vs. material: economic impacts of a "wood-for-energy scenario" on the forest-based sector in Austria - a simulation approach. , 2010 .

[22]  Bjart Holtsmark,et al.  The outcome is in the assumptions: analyzing the effects on atmospheric CO2 levels of increased use of bioenergy from forest biomass , 2013 .

[23]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings , 2006 .

[24]  B. Solberg,et al.  Second-generation biofuels: impacts on bioheat production and forest products markets. , 2013 .

[25]  J. Bowyer,et al.  Forest Carbon Accounting Considerations in US Bioenergy Policy , 2014 .

[26]  R. Lundmark.  Cost structure of and competition for forest-based biomass , 2006 .

[27]  B. Sohngen,et al.  Economic approach to assess the forest carbon implications of biomass energy. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  J. Fuglestvedt,et al.  Alternatives to the Global Warming Potential for Comparing Climate Impacts of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases , 2005 .

[29]  G. Ståhl,et al.  A Three-step Approach for Modelling Tree Mortality in Swedish Forests , 2001 .

[30]  A. Lehtonen,et al.  Stand Structure and Recent Climate Change Constrain Stand Basal Area Change in European Forests: A Comparison Across Boreal, Temperate, and Mediterranean Biomes , 2014, Ecosystems.

[31]  J. Buongiorno,et al.  Consequences of increasing bioenergy demand on wood and forests: An application of the Global Forest Products Model , 2011 .

[32]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Timing of carbon emissions from global forest clearance , 2012 .

[33]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Large‐scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral , 2012 .

[34]  N. Fahlvik,et al.  Evaluation of growth functions used in the Swedish Forest Planning System Heureka , 2014 .

[35]  Thomas Knoke,et al.  The influence of the oil price on timber supply , 2014 .

[36]  Xiaohui Tian,et al.  Does wood bioenergy increase carbon stocks in forests , 2012 .

[37]  Christopher S. Galik,et al.  Forest biomass supply in the southeastern United States - implications for industrial roundwood and bioenergy production. , 2009 .

[38]  Bill Hare,et al.  The role of biotic carbon stocks in stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at safe levels , 1999 .

[39]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  First signs of carbon sink saturation in European forest biomass , 2013 .

[40]  Kenneth E. Skog,et al.  Projection of U.S. forest sector carbon sequestration under U.S. and global timber market and wood energy consumption scenarios, 2010-2060. , 2012 .

[41]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Climate mitigation comparison of woody biomass systems with the inclusion of land-use in the reference fossil system , 2014 .

[42]  Göran I. Ågren,et al.  Forest carbon balances at the landscape scale investigated with the Q model and the CoupModel - Responses to intensified harvests , 2013 .

[43]  Joseph L. Conrad,et al.  Wood-energy market impact on competition, procurement practices, and profitability of landowners and forest products industry in the U.S. south , 2011 .

[44]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming , 2011 .

[45]  Mark A. DeLuchi.  GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS FROM THE USE OF NEW FUELS FOR TRANSPORTATION AND ELECTRICITY , 1993 .

[46]  B. Solberg,et al.  An economic analysis of the potential contribution of forest biomass to the EU RES target and its implications for the EU forest industries , 2011 .

[47]  Annie Levasseur,et al.  Key issues and options in accounting for carbon sequestration and temporary storage in life cycle assessment and carbon footprinting , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[48]  C. Canham,et al.  Uncertainty in projecting GHG emissions from bioenergy , 2014 .

[49]  G. Woodwell,et al.  Changes in the Carbon Content of Terrestrial Biota and Soils between 1860 and 1980: A Net Release of CO"2 to the Atmosphere , 1983 .

[50]  M. Lindner,et al.  Trade-Offs Between Forest Protection and Wood Supply in Europe , 2014, Environmental Management.

[51]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[52]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Swedish biomass strategies to reduce CO2 emission and oil use in an EU context , 2012 .

[53]  A. V. Amstel,et al.  The land cover and carbon cycle consequences of large-scale utilizations of biomass as an energy source , 1996 .

[54]  R. Sathre,et al.  Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution , 2010 .

[55]  R. Beach,et al.  A multi-sector intertemporal optimization approach to assess the GHG implications of U.S. forest and agricultural biomass electricity expansion , 2013 .

[56]  B. Solberg.  Forest biomass as carbon sink : Economic value and forest management/policy implications , 1997 .

[57]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy and land use change—state of the art , 2013 .

[58]  S. Berg,et al.  Energy efficiency and the environmental impact of harvesting stumps and logging residues , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[59]  Martin Börjesson,et al.  Biomass gasification in cost-optimized district heating systems — A regional modelling analysis , 2010 .

[60]  K. Blennow,et al.  Forest owner motivations and attitudes towards supplying biomass for energy in Europe , 2014 .

[61]  Werner Rammer,et al.  Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. , 2014, Nature climate change.

[62]  T. Nilsson,et al.  Are Swedish forest soils sinks or sources for CO2—model analyses based on forest inventory data , 2008 .

[63]  Erik Trømborg,et al.  Forest sector impacts of the increased use of wood in energy production in Norway. , 2010 .

[64]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Bioenergy and land use change - state of the art. , 2013 .

[65]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Accounting for time in Mitigating Global Warming through land-use change and forestry , 2000 .

[66]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  The Heureka Forestry Decision Support System: An Overview , 2011, Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci..

[67]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[68]  P. Wikberg.  Occurrence, morphology and growth of understory saplings in Swedish forests , 2004 .

[69]  G. Berndes,et al.  Carbon sinks and the CDM: could a bioenergy linkage offer a constructive compromise? , 2001 .

[70]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Time-dependent climate benefits of using forest residues to substitute fossil fuels , 2011 .