Spatial Representation in Blind Children. 3: Effects of Individual Differences

Theories of spatial representation in blind people have focused on the type of representation of which they, as a group, are capable. This approach overlooks an important issue, namely, the differences among individual blind people and the effects that these differences have on the way spatial information is represented. Data from another article by the author on the same study of spatial representation in blind children were subjected to two step-wise regression analyses to determine the relationships between several subject-related variables and responses to “map” (cognitive map) and “route” (sequential memory) questions about the position of furniture in a recently explored room. The independent variables accounted for 70 percent of the variance on map questions but only 46 percent of the variance on route questions. On map questions, general intellectual ability correlated positively with performance (p < .01), children with visual acuity better than light perception in the first 3 years of life performed better than those with less early vision (p < .05), and children who became blind from retrolental fibroplasia performed more poorly than those whose blindness was due to other causes (p < .05). Fewer independent variables contributed to the variance in performance on route questions. Again children with visual acuity better than light perception in their first 3 years performed better than those with less early vision.

[1]  Cognitive Models for Spatial Representations in Congenitally Blind, Adventitiously Blind, and Sighted Subjects , 1976 .

[2]  J. Drever,et al.  Early learning and the perception of space. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  J. Fletcher Spatial Representation in Blind Children. 1: Development Compared to Sighted Children , 1980 .

[4]  Bertha K. Duncan A Comparative Study of Finger-Maze Learning by Blind and Sighted Subjects , 1934 .

[5]  W. Keeler Autistic patterns and defective communication in blind children with retrolental fibroplasia. , 1956, Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Psychopathological Association.

[6]  Steven M. Casey,et al.  Cognitive Mapping by the Blind , 1978 .

[7]  Magdalen Dorothea Vernon,et al.  The Education of the visually handicapped , 1972 .

[8]  Viktor Lowenfeld,et al.  Tests for Visual and Haptical Aptitudes , 1945 .

[9]  D. H. Warren Early vs. Late Vision: The Role of Early Vision in Spatial Reference Systems , 1974 .

[10]  Linda J. Anooshian,et al.  Early vs. late blindness: The role of early vision in spatial behavior. , 1973 .

[11]  H. L. Koch,et al.  A comparative study of stylus maze learning by blind and seeing subjects , 1926 .

[12]  Janet F. Fletcher,et al.  Spatial Representation in Blind Children. 2: Effects of Task Variations , 1981 .

[13]  P. Worchel,et al.  Sensory Contributions to Human Maze Learning: A Comparison of Matched Blind, Deaf, and Normals , 1956 .

[14]  C. Carter Blindness in Children , 1968, Nature.

[15]  J. Hallenbeck Pseudo-Retardation in Retrolental Fibroplasia , 1954 .

[16]  T. Schlaegel The dominant method of imagery in blind as compared to sighted adolescents. , 1953, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[17]  M. Williams Superior intelligence of children blinded from retinoblastoma. , 1968, Archives of disease in childhood.

[18]  C. Tzortzis Cognitive studies. 2. Deficits in cognition : Edited by J. Hellmuth. Brunner-Mazel, New York, 1971 363 pp. $15.00 , 1972 .

[19]  Jane McReynolds,et al.  Geographic Orientation in the Blind , 1954 .