I just don't know why it's gone: maintaining informal information use in inpatient care

We conducted a field-based study examining informal nursing information. We examined the use of this information before and after the adoption of a CPOE (Computerized Provider Order Entry) system in an inpatient unit of a large teaching hospital. Before CPOE adoption, nurses used paper working documents to detail psycho-social information about patients; after the CPOE adoption, they did not use paper or digital notes as was planned. The paper describes this process and analyses how several interlocked reasons contributed to the loss of this information in written form. We found that a change in physical location, sufficient convenience, visibility of the information, and permanency of information account for some, but not all, of the outcome. As well, we found that computerization of the nursing data led to a shift in the politics of the information itself - the nurses no longer had a cohesive agreement about the kinds of data to enter into the system. The findings address the requirements of healthcare computerization to support both formal and informal work practices, respecting the nature of nursing work and the politics of information inherent in complex medical work.

[1]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[2]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  The memoirs of two survivors: or the evaluation of a computer system for cooperative work , 1988, CSCW '88.

[3]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  An observational study on information flow during nurses' shift change , 2007, CHI.

[4]  Rob Procter,et al.  Supporting informality: team working and integrated care records , 2004, CSCW.

[5]  P Coleman,et al.  'Scraps': hidden nursing information and its influence on the delivery of care. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Permutations of cooperative work practices: a study of two oncology clinics , 2007, GROUP.

[7]  Michelle Butler,et al.  Modes of rationality in nursing documentation: biology, biography and the 'voice of nursing'. , 2005, Nursing inquiry.

[8]  A. Young Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[9]  Steven D. Edwards,et al.  Philosophy of Nursing: An Introduction , 2001 .

[10]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[11]  Brenda Silverman,et al.  Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time , 1993 .

[12]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  Christian Heath,et al.  Documents and professional practice: “bad” organisational reasons for “good” clinical records , 1996, CSCW '96.

[14]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Artifacts and collaborative work in healthcare: methodological, theoretical, and technological implications of the tangible , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[15]  Ina Wagner,et al.  Women's voice: The case of nursing information systems , 1993, AI & SOCIETY.

[16]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  “I love the system—I just don't use it!” , 1997, GROUP.

[17]  Hilda Tellioglu,et al.  Work Practices Surrounding PACS: The Politics of Space in Hospitals , 2001, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[18]  M M Shabot,et al.  Sociotechnical Requirements Analysis for Clinical Systems , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[19]  A. Strauss Social Organization of Medical Work , 1985 .

[20]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005 .

[21]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Recognising “success” and “failure”: evaluating groupware in a commercial context , 1997, GROUP.