VP‐Nets : Efficient automatic localization of key brain structures in 3D fetal neurosonography

HighlightsWe propose VP‐Nets for brain structure localization in 3D fetal neurosonography.The proposed 2.5D CNN is memory efficient, producing a high resolution 3D output.Our model can handle structure overlap while keeping contextual information.Visualization of the trained VP‐Nets is described.VP‐Nets is compared with Random Forests and 3D U‐Nets. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available. ABSTRACT Three‐dimensional (3D) fetal neurosonography is used clinically to detect cerebral abnormalities and to assess growth in the developing brain. However, manual identification of key brain structures in 3D ultrasound images requires expertise to perform and even then is tedious. Inspired by how sonographers view and interact with volumes during real‐time clinical scanning, we propose an efficient automatic method to simultaneously localize multiple brain structures in 3D fetal neurosonography. The proposed View‐based Projection Networks (VP‐Nets), uses three view‐based Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), to simplify 3D localizations by directly predicting 2D projections of the key structures onto three anatomical views. While designed for efficient use of data and GPU memory, the proposed VP‐Nets allows for full‐resolution 3D prediction. We investigated parameters that influence the performance of VP‐Nets, e.g. depth and number of feature channels. Moreover, we demonstrate that the model can pinpoint the structure in 3D space by visualizing the trained VP‐Nets, despite only 2D supervision being provided for a single stream during training. For comparison, we implemented two other baseline solutions based on Random Forest and 3D U‐Nets. In the reported experiments, VP‐Nets consistently outperformed other methods on localization. To test the importance of loss function, two identical models are trained with binary corss‐entropy and dice coefficient loss respectively. Our best VP‐Net model achieved prediction center deviation: 1.8 ± 1.4 mm, size difference: 1.9 ± 1.5 mm, and 3D Intersection Over Union (IOU): 63.2 ± 14.7% when compared to the ground truth. To make the whole pipeline intervention free, we also implement a skull‐stripping tool using 3D CNN, which achieves high segmentation accuracy. As a result, the proposed processing pipeline takes a raw ultrasound brain image as input, and output a skull‐stripped image with five detected key brain structures.

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project , 2014, The Lancet.

[2]  Adem Kiris,et al.  Sonographic measurement of the fetal cerebellum, cisterna magna, and cavum septum pellucidum in normal fetuses in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy , 2003, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[3]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Marginal Space Deep Learning: Efficient Architecture for Volumetric Image Parsing , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Fei-Fei Li,et al.  Attribute Learning in Large-Scale Datasets , 2010, ECCV Workshops.

[5]  Jinglu Tan,et al.  Automated fetal head detection and measurement in ultrasound images by iterative randomized Hough transform. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[7]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Describing ultrasound video content using deep convolutional neural networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[8]  M. Yayla,et al.  Nomogram of Fetal Cisterna Magna Width at 15-24 th Gestational Weeks , 2011 .

[9]  Gaojun Teng,et al.  Development of the human fetal cerebellum in the second trimester: a post mortem magnetic resonance imaging evaluation , 2011, Journal of anatomy.

[10]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi,et al.  V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation , 2016, 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV).

[12]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  ConvNet-Based Localization of Anatomical Structures in 3-D Medical Images , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations , 2017, DLMIA/ML-CDS@MICCAI.

[14]  I. Timor-Tritsch,et al.  Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘fetal neurosonogram’ , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Regression Forests for Efficient Anatomy Detection and Localization in CT Studies , 2010, MCV.

[16]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Learning-based prediction of gestational age from ultrasound images of the fetal brain , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  F Xavier Castellanos,et al.  Brain development and ADHD. , 2006, Clinical psychology review.

[18]  Konstantinos Kamnitsas,et al.  SonoNet: Real-Time Detection and Localisation of Fetal Standard Scan Planes in Freehand Ultrasound , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Automatic Detection and Measurement of Structures in Fetal Head Ultrasound Volumes Using Sequential Estimation and Integrated Detection Network (IDN) , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Thomas Brox,et al.  3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation , 2016, MICCAI.

[21]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Fetal head circumference: relation to menstrual age. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  J. Spencer,et al.  Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation: Analysis of inter‐ and intra‐observer variability , 1993, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[23]  E P Riley,et al.  Brain dysmorphology in individuals with severe prenatal alcohol exposure , 2001, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[24]  Anthony Gamst,et al.  Brain dysmorphology in individuals with severe prenatal alcohol exposure , 2001 .

[25]  Laurence Rouet,et al.  Optimization of Fetal Biometry With 3D Ultrasound and Image Recognition (EPICEA): protocol for a prospective cross-sectional study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[26]  S. Carroll,et al.  Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal brain abnormalities , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[27]  Daguang Xu,et al.  Robust 3D Organ Localization with Dual Learning Architectures and Fusion , 2016, LABELS/DLMIA@MICCAI.

[28]  Xiangrong Zhou,et al.  Automatic organ localizations on 3D CT images by using majority-voting of multiple 2D detections based on local binary patterns and Haar-like features , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[29]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Fetal cranial segmentation in 2D ultrasound images using shape properties of pixel clusters , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[30]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.