A Multi-scale Kernel Bundle for LDDMM: Towards Sparse Deformation Description across Space and Scales

The Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping framework constitutes a widely used and mathematically well-founded setup for registration in medical imaging. At its heart lies the notion of the regularization kernel, and the choice of kernel greatly affects the results of registrations. This paper presents an extension of the LDDMM framework allowing multiple kernels at multiple scales to be incorporated in each registration while preserving many of the mathematical properties of standard LDDMM. On a dataset of landmarks from lung CT images, we show by example the influence of the kernel size in standard LDDMM, and we demonstrate how our framework, LDDKBM, automatically incorporates the advantages of each scale to reach the same accuracy as the standard method optimally tuned with respect to scale. The framework, which is not limited to landmark data, thus removes the need for classical scale selection. Moreover, by decoupling the momentum across scales, it promises to provide better interpolation properties, to allow sparse descriptions of the total deformation, to remove the tradeoff between match quality and regularity, and to allow for momentum based statistics using scale information.

[1]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Evolutions equations in computational anatomy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Riemannian Elasticity: A Statistical Regularization Framework for Non-linear Registration , 2005, MICCAI.

[4]  Paul Dupuis,et al.  Variational problems on ows of di eomorphisms for image matching , 1998 .

[5]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  A Log-Euclidean Framework for Statistics on Diffeomorphisms , 2006, MICCAI.

[6]  Monica Hernandez,et al.  Registration of Anatomical Images Using Paths of Diffeomorphisms Parameterized with Stationary Vector Field Flows , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2005, 8th International Conference, Palm Springs, CA, USA, October 26-29, 2005, Proceedings, Part II , 2005, MICCAI.

[8]  L. Younes,et al.  Statistics on diffeomorphisms via tangent space representations , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  Lasse Riis Østergaard,et al.  Active Surface Approach for Extraction of the Human Cerebral Cortex from MRI , 2006, MICCAI.

[10]  L. Younes Shapes and Diffeomorphisms , 2010 .

[11]  R. Castillo,et al.  A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Simultaneous Fine and Coarse Diffeomorphic Registration: Application to Atrophy Measurement in Alzheimer's Disease , 2010, MICCAI.

[13]  M. Micheli The differential geometry of landmark shape manifolds: metrics, geodesics, and curvature , 2008 .

[14]  Ulf Grenander,et al.  General Pattern Theory: A Mathematical Study of Regular Structures , 1993 .

[15]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Computing Large Deformation Metric Mappings via Geodesic Flows of Diffeomorphisms , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2010, 13th International Conference, Beijing, China, September 20-24, 2010, Proceedings, Part III , 2010, MICCAI.

[17]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Tom Vercauteren,et al.  Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  Darryl D. Holm,et al.  Singular solutions, momentum maps and computational anatomy , 2006, nlin/0605020.