Data standards quality measured for achieving enterprise interoperability: the case of the SETU standard for flexible staffing

Abstract Data standards should play an important role in achieving inter-organizational interoperability. Millions are spent on development and adoption of these standards, but does it lead to interoperability? This important question is often not addressed. In this study data interoperability in the Dutch temporary staffing industry is studied by focusing on the quality of the SETU standard and its implementations in practice. The Stichting Elektronische Transacties Uitzendbranche (foundation for electronic transactions in the staffing industry) or SETU, develops and maintains standards for exchange of electronic data in the staffing industry. Our results show that although the SETU standard is equipped for achieving interoperability, this in practice has not been achieved due to low quality implementations. We raise the question why these studies are not being performed on every standard. Another result is that localizations (profiles) may be needed for high quality standards; without localizations interoperability is limited in the SETU case.

[1]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry , 2006, MIS Q..

[2]  Marten van Sinderen,et al.  Pragmatic Interoperability: A Systematic Review of Published Definitions , 2010, EAI2N.

[3]  Daan B. B. Rijsenbrij,et al.  The specification, engineering, and measurement of information systems quality , 1992, J. Syst. Softw..

[4]  Christina Soh,et al.  Standards development and diffusion: a case study of RosettaNet , 2007, CACM.

[5]  Roy Rada Standards: the language for success , 1993, CACM.

[6]  Yildiray Kabak,et al.  Collaborative Business Process Support in eHealth: Integrating IHE Profiles Through ebXML Business Process Specification Language , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[7]  Pontus Johnson Preface - Enterprise Interoperability: Proceedings of the Workshops of the Third International IFIP Working Conference IWEI 2011 , 2011 .

[8]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Top IS research on Quality of Transaction Standards: A Structured Literature Review to Identify a Research Gap , 2009 .

[9]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance , 2002, CACM.

[10]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Standards and Public Policy , 2006 .

[11]  Arianna Brutti,et al.  Use Profile Management for Standard Conformant Customisation , 2010, I-ESA.

[12]  Harris Wu,et al.  Quality of XBRL US GAAP Taxonomy: Empirical Evaluation Using SEC Filings , 2010, AMCIS.

[13]  Boris Otto,et al.  A characteristics framework for Semantic Information Systems Standards , 2012, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[14]  Boris Otto,et al.  Data Quality Requirements of Collaborative Business Processes , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Harris Wu,et al.  Quality of data standards: framework and illustration using XBRL taxonomy and instances , 2011, Electron. Mark..

[16]  Jan Gottschick,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Quality of Interoperability Specifications for the Web , 2010, 2010 36th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications.

[17]  Paavo Kotinurmi,et al.  A review of XML-based supply-chain integration , 2004 .

[18]  Kees van Slooten,et al.  Business Process Requirements, Modeling Technique and Standard: how to Identify Interoperability Gaps on a Process Level , 2006 .

[19]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Do semantic standards lack quality? A survey among 34 semantic standards , 2011, Electron. Mark..

[20]  Boonserm Kulvatunyou,et al.  Development Life Cycle for Semantically Coherent Data Exchange Specification , 2008, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[21]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Standards and Public Policy: Promoting e-business through vertical IS standards: lessons from the US home mortgage industry , 2006 .

[22]  Christine Legner,et al.  Preface to the Focus Theme Section: 'Business Interoperability' Business Interoperability Research: Present Achievements and Upcoming Challenges , 2007, Electron. Mark..

[23]  Erwin Folmer,et al.  Quality of semantic standards , 2012 .

[24]  Idabc European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services , 2004 .

[25]  Hongwei Zhu,et al.  Towards Quality of Data Standards: Empirical Findings from XBRL , 2009, ICIS.

[26]  Kwok-bun Yue,et al.  Analysis and Metrics of XML Schema , 2004, Software Engineering Research and Practice.

[27]  E. Kajan Electronic Business Interoperability: Concepts, Opportunities and Challenges , 2011 .

[28]  Tineke M. Egyedi,et al.  The Dynamics of Standards , 2008 .

[29]  Kaushal Chari,et al.  Demystifying integration , 2004, CACM.

[30]  Jean-Paul Bourrières,et al.  Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications , 2005 .

[31]  Kurt Kosanke ISO Standards for Interoperability: a Comparison , 2006 .

[32]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Interorganizational System Standards Development in Vertical Industries , 2005, Electron. Mark..

[33]  Sheila A. Martin,et al.  Interoperability costs in the US automotive supply chain , 2002 .

[34]  Georges Gardarin,et al.  Semantic technologies and e-business , 2011 .

[35]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Cooperative Advantage and Vertical Information System Standards: An Automotive Supply Chain Case Study , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[36]  Raluca Bunduchi,et al.  Social Shaping & Standardization: A Case Study from Auto Industry , 2005, HICSS.

[37]  Ben van Lier Luhmann ontmoet ‘the Matrix’: Uitwisselen en delen van informatie in netcentrische omgevingen , 2009 .

[38]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.