The Shifting Sands of Peacemaking: Challenges of Multiparty Mediation

Multiparty mediation, which occurs when two or more third parties cooperate or compete in helping antagonists negotiate a conflict settlement, carries both risks and rewards as a conflict management strategy. Cooperating multiple third parties can increase the chances of crafting an agreement, band together to create greater pressure on the conflict parties to reach agreement, and supply outside resources to help implement the negotiated agreement. Competing multiple third parties can undercut each other, prolonging the conflict and allowing antagonists to resist necessary compromises and negotiated concessions. This article examines the changing environment for multiparty mediation and the impact of five changes that affect the practice of mediation. It derives some interim conclusions about where the field is heading and offers some recommendations for making multiparty engagements more effective.

[1]  Daniel C. Kurtzer,et al.  Negotiating Arab-Israeli Peace: American Leadership in the Middle East , 2008 .

[2]  Fen Osler Hampson,et al.  A Crowded Stage: Liabilities and Benefits of Multiparty Mediation , 2001 .

[3]  G. Schneider,et al.  Who Mediates? the Political Economy of International Conflict Management , 2000 .

[4]  J. Abbink Ethiopia—Eritrea: proxy wars and prospects of peace in the horn of Africa , 2003 .

[5]  I. Zartman,et al.  Global Power of Talk: Negotiating America's Interests , 2011 .

[6]  D. Lanz,et al.  A crowded field : competition and coordination in international peace mediation , 2013 .

[7]  A. Greif,et al.  A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[8]  S. Vuković International Multiparty Mediation and Conflict Management: Challenges of Cooperation and Coordination , 2015 .

[9]  T. Hopf The logic of habit in International Relations , 2010 .

[10]  Charles Snyder BOOK REVIEW: Crocker, Chester, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, eds. HERDING CATS: MULTIPARTY MEDIATION IN A COMPLEX WORLD. Washington: USIP, 1999. , 2001 .

[11]  Teresa Whitfield,et al.  Friends Indeed?: The United Nations, Groups of Friends, and the Resolution of Conflict , 2007 .

[12]  H. Fuchinoue,et al.  Toward a Better Understanding of Multiparty Mediation in International Relations , 2009 .

[13]  P. Wallensteen,et al.  Regional organizations and peacemaking : challengers to the UN? , 2014 .

[14]  Joakim Kreutz,et al.  How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination dataset , 2010 .

[15]  T. Böhmelt,et al.  Disaggregating Mediations: The Impact of Multiparty Mediation , 2011 .

[16]  J. Rubin,et al.  Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management , 1994 .

[17]  Lotta Themnér,et al.  Armed conflicts, 1946–2013 , 2014 .

[18]  W. Mead The Return of Geopolitics , 2014 .

[19]  Paul D. Williams,et al.  The New Politics of Protection: Cote d’Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect , 2011 .

[20]  Elizabeth C. Economy China's Imperial President , 2014 .

[21]  Edward N. Luttwak,et al.  Give War a Chance , 1999 .

[22]  M. Finnemore,et al.  International Norm Dynamics and Political Change , 1998, International Organization.

[23]  M. Toft Ending Civil Wars: A Case for Rebel Victory , 2010, International Security.

[24]  Ronald J. Fisher,et al.  Assessing the Contingency Model of Third-Party Intervention in Successful Cases of Prenegotiation , 2007 .