Visual search in modern human-computer interfaces

Abstract This article reviews aspects of visual search in relation to computer visual display units. Theoretical issues such as eye movements in visual search are discussed as well as practical examples such as the role of array shape, the benefits of cursor-presented status (insert vs overtype) information, conspicuity of peripherally presented information, and possible benefits of anti-aliased fonts. In association with the four experiments relating to these aspects, the respective follow-up eye movement monitoring studies are also described as these allowed quantification of what otherwise might only have been inferred. The review concludes with four major recommendations. First, much scope remains for exploring the optimization of status (e.g., cursor-presented) information. Second, it would be worth exploring whether icons, like verbal labels, are susceptible to an array shape effect. Third, further work is required (e.g. in the possible role of articulatory differences) in accounting for the ease of...

[1]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Cue generation and combination for mammographic screening , 1993 .

[2]  Paul Muter,et al.  The role of graphics in item selection from menus , 1986 .

[3]  A. Lickorish,et al.  Ease of annotation in proof-reading tasks , 1984 .

[4]  G. Perlman.  Making the right choices with menus , 1987 .

[5]  Stanley R. Parkinson,et al.  Computer display menus , 1983 .

[6]  U. Neisser,et al.  SEARCHING THROUGH WORD LISTS , 1965 .

[7]  J. D. Gould,et al.  Doing the Same Work with Hard Copy and with Cathode-Ray Tube (CRT) Computer Terminals , 1984 .

[8]  D. Scott,et al.  Visual search and VDUs , 1993 .

[9]  R C Carter,et al.  Color and conspicuousness. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  T. Boersema,et al.  Compatibility of simplified and realistic stimulus fields in visual search , 1993 .

[11]  R. Haber,et al.  The psychology of visual perception , 1973 .

[12]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  The importance of item distinctiveness on performance using a menu selection system , 1986 .

[13]  Frank H. Heppner,et al.  Reading Performance on a Standardized Test is Better from Print than from Computer Display. , 1985 .

[14]  Crow,et al.  A Comparison of Antialiasing Techniques , 1981, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[15]  James N. MacGregor,et al.  Menu Search: Random or Systematic? , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[16]  U. Neisser,et al.  REDIRECTING THE SEARCH PROCESS , 1965 .

[17]  J. Antes.  The time course of picture viewing. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  William C. Treurniet,et al.  Extended Reading of Continuous Text on Television Screens , 1982 .

[19]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[20]  William P. Marshak,et al.  Signal Detection Performance as a Function of Fourier Description of Symbols , 1987 .

[21]  C W ERIKSEN,et al.  Location of objects in a visual display as a function of the number of dimensions on which the objects differ. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  T S Tullis,et al.  The Formatting of Alphanumeric Displays: A Review and Analysis , 1983, Human factors.

[23]  John E. Warnock,et al.  The display of characters using gray level sample arrays , 1980, SIGGRAPH '80.

[24]  Susanne Askwall,et al.  Computer Supported Reading vs Reading Text on Paper: A Comparison of Two Reading Situations , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[25]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[26]  R Näsänen,et al.  Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  J R Bloomfield,et al.  Visual Search in Complex Fields: Size Differences between Target Disc and Surrounding Discs , 1972, Human factors.

[28]  Anita V. Kak.  Relationships Between Readability of Printed and Crt-Displayed Text , 1981 .

[29]  R. Klein,et al.  Effects of arousal on human visual dominance , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Training of efficient oculomotor strategies enhances skill acquisition. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[31]  R Hilz,et al.  Functional organization of the peripheral retina: sensitivity to periodic stimuli. , 1974, Vision research.

[32]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[33]  F. L. Engel.  Visual conspicuity, visual search and fixation tendencies of the eye , 1977, Vision Research.

[34]  Stanley R. Parkinson,et al.  Effects of Breadth, Depth and Number of Responses on Computer Menu Search Performance , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[35]  John D. Gould,et al.  Why reading was slower from CRT displays than from paper , 1986, CHI '87.

[36]  Luc Giroux,et al.  What's on the menu? The influence of menu content on the selection process , 1986 .

[37]  V Barnes,et al.  Reading Is Slower from CRT Displays than from Paper: Attempts to Isolate a Single-Variable Explanation , 1987, Human factors.

[38]  John D. Gould,et al.  Reading from CRT Displays Can Be as Fast as Reading from Paper , 1987 .

[39]  S. Fairclough,et al.  Changes in drivers' visual behavior due to the introduction of complex versus simple route navigation information , 1993 .

[40]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  On the parameters of human visual performance: an investigation of the benefits of antialiasing , 1987, CHI 1987.

[42]  C. Eriksen.  Partitioning and saturation of visual displays and efficiency of visual search. , 1955 .

[43]  Colin J. Theaker,et al.  Human-Computer Interface Recording , 1988, Comput. J..

[44]  Peter R. Newsted,et al.  Paper versus Online Presentations of Subjective Questionnaires , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[45]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. I. The near peripheral visual field (eccentricity 0 degrees-8 degrees). , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[46]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Learning a menu selection tree: training methods compared , 1985 .

[47]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Proof-reading on VDUs , 1987 .

[48]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages , 1983, Computer.

[49]  W. Graf,et al.  METHODS FOR THE ERGONOMICAL EVALUATION OF ALPHANUMERIC COMPUTER-GENERATED DISPLAYS , 1987 .

[50]  Udo Arend,et al.  Evidence for global feature superiority in menu selection by icons , 1987 .

[51]  David J. Oborne,et al.  Reading from Screen versus Paper: There is No Difference , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[52]  A. Jacobs.  Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control? , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Temporal contrast sensitivity and cortical magnification , 1982, Vision Research.

[54]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Direct Manipulation Interfaces , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[55]  W. Graf,et al.  Ergonomic evaluation of user-interfaces by means of eye-movement data , 1989 .

[56]  Kellogg S. Booth,et al.  On the Parameters of Human Visual Performance: An Investigation of the Benefits of Antialiasing , 1987, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[57]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[58]  James N. MacGregor,et al.  Minimizing User Search Time in Menu Retrieval Systems , 1985 .

[59]  James N. MacGregor,et al.  Optimizing the Structure of Database Menu Indexes: A Decision Model of Menu Search , 1986 .

[60]  J. Jonides.  Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[61]  Satish Gupta,et al.  YODA: an advanced display for personal computers , 1987 .

[62]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[63]  Kenneth Turkowski,et al.  Anti-aliasing in topological color spaces , 1986, SIGGRAPH.

[64]  D. Scott,et al.  Optimum Display Arrangements for Presenting Status Information , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[65]  U. Neisser.  Decision-time without reaction-time: Experiments in visual scanning. , 1963 .

[66]  U NEISSER,et al.  Searching for Ten Targets Simultaneously , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[67]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[68]  Paul Muter,et al.  Reading of Continuous Text on Video Screens , 1984 .

[69]  Walter Bender,et al.  CRT Typeface Design and Evaluation , 1987 .

[70]  C W ERIKSEN,et al.  Object location in a complex perceptual field. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[71]  F. L. Engel.  Visual conspicuity, directed attention and retinal locus. , 1971, Vision research.

[72]  C. Umilta.  Orienting of attention. , 1988 .

[73]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  A psychophysical approach to assessing the quality of antialiased images , 1988, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[74]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  The Relation Between Visibility Span and Eye Movements in Various Scanning Tasks , 1984 .

[75]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. IV. The influence of the mean retinal illuminance. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[76]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  How to make type readable: a manual for typographers, printers and advertisers , based on twelve years of research involving speed of reading tests given to 33,031 persons , 1940 .

[77]  S. Klein,et al.  Sampling in spatial vision , 1986, Nature.

[78]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  10 – THE PERCEPTION OF FORM: Retina to Striate Cortex , 1989 .

[79]  William Leler,et al.  Human vision, anti-aliasing, and the cheap 4000 line display , 1980, SIGGRAPH '80.

[80]  A. Lickorish,et al.  Proof-reading texts on screen and paper , 1983 .