Assessing Intellectual Development: Three Approaches, One Sequence

In this paper, I compare three developmental assessment systems, employed to score a set of 152 interviews of engineering students: the Perry Scoring System (W. G. Perry, 1970), the Hierarchical Complexity Scoring System (T. L. Dawson, 2004, 1/31/03), and the Lexical Abstraction Assessment System (LAAS; T. L. Dawson & M. Wilson, in press). Overall, the Hierarchical Complexity Scoring System and Perry Scoring System agree with one another within the parameters of interrater agreement commonly reported for either one of the systems, and the Perry system and the LAAS agree with one another about as well as the LAAS and the Hierarchical Complexity Scoring System, upon which the LAAS is based.

[1]  Barbara Henderson,et al.  Individual Variability and Consistency in Cognitive Development: New Evidence for the Existence of Central Conceptual Structures , 1993 .

[2]  T. Dawson Layers of Structure : A comparison of two approaches to developmental assessment , 2004 .

[3]  L. Kohlberg Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .

[4]  C. Brainerd Cognitive Development Is Abrupt (but Not Stage-Like). , 1993 .

[5]  J. W. Fowler,et al.  Stages of Faith: The Psychology of Human Development and the Quest for Meaning. Author's Response , 1982, Horizons.

[6]  Michael Lamport Commons,et al.  Hierarchical Complexity of Tasks Shows the Existence of Developmental Stages , 1998 .

[7]  E. Turiel Domain-Specific Social Judgments and Domain Ambiguities. , 1989 .

[8]  C. Radclyffe Hall,et al.  The Annual Meeting of the Association , 1860 .

[9]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  Measuring Cognitive Growth In Engineering Undergraduates: A Longitudinal Study , 2001 .

[10]  Phillip K. Wood,et al.  Developmental Range of Reflective Judgment: The Effect of Contextual Support and Practice on Developmental Stage , 1993 .

[11]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  The Effects of a First‐Year Engineering Design Course on Student Intellectual Development as Measured by the Perry Scheme , 2000 .

[12]  J. Kurfiss Sequentiality and Structure in a Cognitive Model of College Student Development. , 1977 .

[13]  N. Enzer,et al.  Psychogenesis and the History of Science , 1990 .

[14]  L. Knefelkamp,et al.  A Cognitive-Developmental Model of Career Development-An Adaptation of the Perry Scheme , 1976 .

[15]  Patricia M. King,et al.  Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education☆ , 1981 .

[16]  Theo L Dawson,et al.  A Stage Is a Stage Is a Stage: A Direct Comparison of Two Scoring Systems , 2003, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[17]  Carole Widick The Perry Scheme: A Foundation for Developmental Practice , 1977 .

[18]  B. Clinchy,et al.  Epistemological and Moral Development in Girls from a Traditional and a Progressive High School. , 1977 .

[19]  K. Fischer A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. , 1980 .

[20]  Cheryl Armon Ideals of the Good Life: A Longitudinal/Cross-Sectional Study of Evaluative Reasoning in Children and Adults , 1984 .

[21]  Anne Colby Standard issue scoring manual , 1987 .

[22]  Graeme S. Halford The properties of representations used in higher cognitive processes: Developmental implications , 1999 .

[23]  L. Kohlberg,et al.  Theoretical foundations and research validation , 1987 .

[24]  W. Overton Form and Content in the Development of Deductive Reasoning. , 1987 .

[25]  Mark Wilson,et al.  The LAAS: A Computerized Scoring System for Small- and Large-Scale Developmental Assessments , 2004 .

[26]  Jean Piaget,et al.  Psychogenesis and the History of Science , 1988 .

[27]  Anne Colby,et al.  The Measurement Of Moral Judgment , 1987 .

[28]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Structure, Development, and Dynamics of Mind: A Meta-Piagetian Theory , 1994 .

[29]  Patricia M. King,et al.  The Reflective Judgment model: Ten years of research. , 1990 .

[30]  Theo L. Dawson,et al.  Developing conceptions of authority and contract across the lifespan: Two perspectives ☆ , 2003 .

[31]  Anne Colby,et al.  The measurement of moral judgment, Vol. 1: Theoretical foundations and research validation; Vol. 2: Standard issue scoring manual. , 1987 .

[32]  A. Machado,et al.  In defense of Piaget's theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. , 1996 .

[33]  Goslin,et al.  Handbook of socialization theory and research , 1969 .

[34]  Monique de Saint Martin Uma "boa" educação , 1999 .

[35]  Mark Wilson,et al.  Domain-general and domain-specific developmental assessments: do they measure the same thing? , 2003 .

[36]  Theo Linda Dawson,et al.  A comparison of three developmental stage scoring systems. , 2002, Journal of applied measurement.

[37]  K. Fischer,et al.  Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. , 1998 .

[38]  W. G. Perry Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[39]  Michael Lamport Commons,et al.  Society and the Highest Stages of Moral Development. , 1992 .