The Interactive Evolution of Human Communication Systems

This paper compares two explanations of the process by which human communication systems evolve: iterated learning and social collaboration. It then reports an experiment testing the social collaboration account. Participants engaged in a graphical communication task either as a member of a community, where they interacted with seven different partners drawn from the same pool, or as a member of an isolated pair, where they interacted with the same partner across the same number of games. Participants' horizontal, pair-wise interactions led "bottom up" to the creation of an effective and efficient shared sign system in the community condition. Furthermore, the community-evolved sign systems were as effective and efficient as the local sign systems developed by isolated pairs. Finally, and as predicted by a social collaboration account, and not by an iterated learning account, interaction was critical to the creation of shared sign systems, with different isolated pairs establishing different local sign systems and different communities establishing different global sign systems.

[1]  F ATTNEAVE,et al.  The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  S. Garrod,et al.  Conversation, co-ordination and convention: an empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions , 1994, Cognition.

[3]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Language Evolution by Iterated Learning With Bayesian Agents , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Development and Validation of Icons Varying in their Abstractness , 1994, Interact. Comput..

[5]  M. Pagel,et al.  Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history , 2007, Nature.

[6]  J. Kegl.  Creation through contact : Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua , 1999 .

[7]  A. Senghas,et al.  Children Creating Language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language Acquired a Spatial Grammar , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  L. Steels,et al.  Crucial factors in the origins of word-meaning , 2000 .

[9]  D. Ladd,et al.  Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and Microcephalin , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  C. Darwin.  The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex: INDEX , 1871 .

[11]  L. Steels.  Evolving grounded communication for robots , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  R. Krauss,et al.  Changes in reference phrases as a function of frequency of usage in social interaction: a preliminary study , 1964 .

[13]  Erez Lieberman,et al.  Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language , 2007, Nature.

[14]  M. Pickering,et al.  Why is conversation so easy? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Bradley Walker,et al.  Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols , 2010 .

[16]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language evolution: consensus and controversies , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  James R. Hurford,et al.  Learning, Culture and Evolution in the Origin of Linguistic Constraints , 1997 .

[18]  Luc Steels,et al.  The Origins of Syntax in Visually Grounded Robotic Agents , 1997, IJCAI.

[19]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue , 2007, Cognition.

[20]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. , 1991 .

[21]  Robert C Berwick,et al.  What genes can't learn about language , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[24]  Kenny Smith,et al.  The evolution of vocabulary. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[26]  L. Steels.  Experiments on the emergence of human communication , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Cultural route to the emergence of linguistic categories , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Patrick G. T. Healey,et al.  A Tool for Performing and Analysing Experiments on Graphical Communication , 2002 .

[30]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[31]  C. Padden,et al.  The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  S. Pinker,et al.  Natural language and natural selection , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems , 2010 .

[34]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Iterated learning: Intergenerational knowledge transmission reveals inductive biases , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Collaborating on contributions to conversations , 1987 .

[36]  D. Pelli,et al.  Feature detection and letter identification , 2006, Vision Research.

[37]  Dale J. Barr.  Establishing conventional communication systems: Is common knowledge necessary? , 2004 .

[38]  Ichiro Umata,et al.  Graphical Language Games: Interactional Constraints on Representational Form , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Development of Dialogue Co-ordination Skills in Schoolchildren. , 1993 .

[41]  S. Kirby,et al.  The emergence of linguistic structure: an overview of the iterated learning model , 2002 .

[42]  Luc Steels,et al.  The synthetic modeling of language origins , 1997 .

[43]  Michel Hupet,et al.  Changes in repeated references: Collaboration or repetition effects? , 1992, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[44]  W. Fitch,et al.  Linguistics: An invisible hand , 2007, Nature.

[45]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[46]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Innateness and culture in the evolution of language , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  R. Krauss,et al.  Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Simulating the Evolution of Language , 2002, Springer London.

[49]  Nick Chater,et al.  Restrictions on biological adaptation in language evolution , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Social psychological models of interpersonal communication , 1996 .

[51]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[52]  K. Laland,et al.  Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. , 2006, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[53]  S. Goldin-Meadow.  The Resilience of Language : What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us About How All Children Learn Language , 2005 .

[54]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[55]  Ann Senghas,et al.  Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language , 2003 .

[56]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Natural Language From Artificial Life , 2002, Artificial Life.

[57]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[58]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding by addressees and overhearers , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[59]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  Robert M. Krauss,et al.  Effect of referent similarity and communication mode on verbal encoding , 1967 .

[61]  Craig W. Reynolds.  Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1998 .

[62]  Tadashi Araragi,et al.  Design and Analysis of Agent Systems by Extended Statecharts , 2003 .

[63]  Jill P. Morford,et al.  Insights to language from the study of gesture: A review of research on the gestural communication of non-signing deaf people , 1996 .

[64]  Reinhard Selten,et al.  The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Computational models of collective behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.