Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions offer the potential for assessing inner ear function at high frequencies. However, commonly employed methods for calibrating the acoustic system used in these studies can lead to errors of +/- 20 dB or more in the estimate of eardrum sound pressure levels above 2-3 kHz [Siegel, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2589-2597 (1994)]. We assessed the magnitude of these errors by measuring the distortion product emission 2f1-f2 (f1 < f2) in human subjects using either of two microphone locations to calibrate the stimulus. Either the emission probe microphone itself or a probe tube positioned near the eardrum were used in calibrations. The emissions collected with f1 in the vicinity of 5-7 kHz showed a pronounced peak in level relative to other stimulus frequencies when the emission probe was used for calibration. The peak at 5-7 kHz disappeared when the probe tube near the eardrum was used for calibration. The discrepancy in emission levels between the two calibration procedures was as large as 20 dB. The difference is attributed to the presence of standing waves in the ear canal. The systematic errors in estimating eardrum sound pressure level using the emission probe microphone undoubtedly contribute to the variability of emission measurements for high-frequency stimuli.

[1]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[2]  R. Hauser,et al.  The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes , 1980, Hearing Research.

[4]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: A comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils , 1987, Hearing Research.

[5]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[6]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of normally-hearing adults , 1992, Hearing Research.

[7]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Clinical Testing of Distortion‐Product Otoacoustic Emissions , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[8]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. Siegel,et al.  The effects of moderate cooling on gross cochlear potentials in the gerbil: Basal and apical differences , 1992, Hearing Research.

[10]  A. M. Brown,et al.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D O Kim,et al.  Distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns. , 1991, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[13]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  M. R. Stinson,et al.  Revision of estimates of acoustic energy reflectance at the human eardrum. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Siegel,et al.  Ear‐canal standing waves and high‐frequency sound calibration using otoacoustic emission probes , 1994 .

[16]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D A Nelson,et al.  Distortion product emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. , 1989, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[18]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability , 1987, Hearing Research.

[19]  D D Dirks,et al.  Basic Acoustic Considerations of Ear Canal: Probe Measurements , 1987, Ear and hearing.

[20]  John W. Matthews,et al.  Modeling Reverse Middle Ear Transmission of Acoustic Distortion Signals , 1983 .

[21]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: Time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2 , 1994, Hearing Research.

[22]  Glen K. Martin,et al.  Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[23]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing‐impaired children and normal adults , 1991, The Laryngoscope.

[24]  D. O. Kim Cochlear mechanics: Implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations , 1980, Hearing Research.

[25]  Comparing the level of the acoustic distortion product 2f1-f2 with behavioural threshold audiograms from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. , 1993, British journal of audiology.

[26]  D T Kemp,et al.  Acoustic emission cochleography--practical aspects. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[27]  R. M. Sachs,et al.  Sound pressure in insert earphone couplers and real ears. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Mead C. Killion,et al.  Small acoustic tubes: New approximations including isothermal and viscous effects , 1988 .

[30]  C. Shera,et al.  Analyzing reverse middle-ear transmission: noninvasive Gedankenexperiments. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  W. W. Clark,et al.  The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.