A full cost environmental accounting experiment

A lack of appropriate measurement techniques has constrained full cost environmental accounting (FCEA) experimentation. Yet, there has been little research on the applicability of valuation techniques recently developed by environmental economists within FLEA frameworks. This paper examines a reporting experiment using these valuation techniques that was undertaken by an Australian Government Department managing publicly owned forests. The FCEA experiment was ultimately not successful. However, the implementation experiences of the Department including the reactions of its managers and stakeholders provide an opportunity to critically reflect on the experimental outcomes to extend the current empirical knowledge of corporate social responsibility reporting. Such critical reflection has not been common in past FCEA experimentation. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Jill L. McKinnon Reliability and Validity in Field Research: Some Strategies and Tactics , 1988 .

[2]  D. Owen,et al.  Green reporting : accountancy and the challenge of the nineties , 1992 .

[3]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[4]  Jason Palmer The economics of environmental improvement: Will SMEs grasp the nettle of environmental accounting? , 1998 .

[5]  A. Belkaoui THE IMPACT OF THE DISCLOSURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR ON THE MARKET , 1976 .

[6]  Jan Bebbington,et al.  Full Cost Accounting: An Agenda for Action , 2001 .

[7]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis , 1987 .

[8]  K. Jan Bebbington Full cost accounting from an environmental perspective: Review , 1998 .

[9]  R. D. Hines,et al.  ACCOUNTING: FILLING THE NEGATIVE SPACE. , 1992 .

[10]  E. Guba Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries , 1981 .

[11]  J. Bennett The contingent valuation method : a post-Kakadu assessment. by Jeff Bennett , 1996 .

[12]  L. Preston,et al.  Corporate social accounting reporting for the physical environment: A critical review and implementation proposal , 1977 .

[13]  J. Herbohn,et al.  Accounting for Forests in Social, Economic and Political Contexts , 1999 .

[14]  Bonnie G. Colby,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Benefit Transfer: An Empirical Inquiry , 1997 .

[15]  Martin Freedman,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE INFORMATIONAL CONTENT OF POLLUTION DISCLOSURES , 1982 .

[16]  Dennis M. Patten Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure , 1991 .

[17]  Jan Bebbington,et al.  An account of sustainability: Failure, success and a reconceptualization , 2001 .

[18]  T. Tinker,et al.  Fatal attractions in the agency relationship , 1991 .

[19]  A. Belkaoui,et al.  Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information , 1989 .

[20]  R. D. Hines,et al.  On Valuing Nature , 1991 .

[21]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[22]  Y. T. Mak Corporate characteristics and the voluntary disclosure of forecast information: A study of New Zealand prospectuses , 1991 .

[23]  R. Gray,et al.  The Greening of Enterprise: An Exploration of the (NON) Role of Environmental Accounting and Environmental Accountants in Organizational Change , 1995 .

[24]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[25]  Dominic Moran,et al.  The Economic Value of Biodiversity. , 1995 .

[26]  Dennis M. Patten INTRA-INDUSTRY ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURES IN RESPONSE TO THE ALASKAN OIL SPILL: A NOTE ON... , 1992 .

[27]  Walter G. Blacconiere,et al.  Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value , 1994 .

[28]  G. Lehman A Legitimate Concern for Environmental Accounting , 1995 .

[29]  K. Ness,et al.  Corporate social disclosure: A note on a test of agency theory , 1991 .

[30]  R. Gray,et al.  Corporate social and environmental reporting , 1995 .

[31]  E. Barbier,et al.  Blueprint for a green economy , 1989 .

[32]  Arieh A. Ullmann Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms , 1985 .

[33]  Robert W. Ingram,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF THE INFORMATION-CONTENT OF (CERTAIN) SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURES , 1978 .

[34]  R. Gray,et al.  Accounting and accountability : changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting , 2003 .

[35]  J. Loomis,et al.  Effects of Gender and Parental Status on the Economic Valuation of Increasing Wetlands, Reducing Wildlife Contamination and Increasing Salmon Populations , 2000 .

[36]  R. Burritt,et al.  Accounting and Ecological Crisis , 1991 .

[37]  Markus J. Milne,et al.  Accounting, Environmental Resource Values, and Non‐market Valuation Techniques for Environmental Resources: A Review , 1991 .

[38]  C. Deegan,et al.  A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations , 1996 .

[39]  K. Herbohn,et al.  Forestry managers' perceptions of the feasibility of incorporating non-market value estimates into financial environmental reporting [Paper in: Experiences in Estimation of Recreation and other Non-market Values of Forest Resources, with Particular Focus on Tropical and Sub-tropical Eastern Australi , 2002 .

[40]  Carlos Larrinaga,et al.  Accounting change or institutional appropriation?—A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting , 2001 .

[41]  Corporate environmental reporting: Some critical thoughts , 1998 .

[42]  Kirk Hamilton Accounting for Sustainability , 2004 .

[43]  R. Roberts,et al.  Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory , 1992 .

[44]  Jere R. Francis,et al.  Letting the chat out of the bag: Deconstruction, privilege and accounting research , 1989 .

[45]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .