Managing Experts and Competing through Innovation: An Activity Theoretical Analysis

An activity theoretical analysis is presented of an organization that is operating in a rapidly changing sector and whose competitiveness depends significantly upon the design skills of its engineers. The company designs high-technology make-to-order products. Like other organizations that compete through knowledge and innovation, the prosperity of this company depends upon its organizational learning, that is, upon the effectiveness with which it can mobilize, apply and develop its distinctive knowledge base as circumstances change. In the difficult context that the company faces, the speed with which projects can move from the initial concept phase through design to production has to become especially important. The paper outlines a general strategy that was developed as the company sought to control this process and traces the consequences for design practices. An activity theoretical approach is used to model the changes that were attempted and the outcomes which emerged and to introduce a discussion of possible future options. The approach (i) emphasizes the relevance of a historical perspective on organizational change, (ii) features the changing nature of expertise in contemporary manufacturing and (iii) discusses the potential significance for collective learning of tensions and incoherencies within a work system.

[1]  A. Schutz The phenomenology of the social world , 1967 .

[2]  Calvin Pava,et al.  Redesigning Sociotechnical Systems Design: Concepts and Methods for the 1990s , 1986 .

[3]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[4]  Diane Waring,et al.  The Dynamics of Strategic Change , 1989 .

[5]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[6]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[7]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Managing Chaos: Dynamic Business Strategies in an Unpredictable World , 1992 .

[8]  Ramachandran Jaikumar,et al.  A dynamic approach to operations management: An alternative to static optimization , 1992 .

[9]  R. Florida,et al.  The new age of capitalism: Innovation-mediated production , 1993 .

[10]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[11]  F. Blackler KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[12]  Anthony Morris,et al.  Activity Theory and the Analysis of Organizations , 1993 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[14]  F. Blackler Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[15]  G. Salaman,et al.  The Conduct of Management and the Management of Conduct: Contemporary Managerial Discourse and the Constitution of the ‘Competent’ Manager* , 1996 .

[16]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[17]  C. Slappendel Perspectives on Innovation in Organizations , 1996 .

[18]  S. L. Star,et al.  Working together: Symbolic interactionism, activity theory, and information systems , 1996 .

[19]  Frank Blackler,et al.  Knowledge, organisations and competition , 1998 .