Delay of gratification: Some longitudinal personality correlates.

Two brief laboratory tasks measuring delay of gratification in different ways were administered to 116 four-year-old children. Personality data were available on these children separately at ages 3, 4, 7, and 11 years in the form of California Child Q-Set ratings by independent sets of teachers and examiners. The two delayof-gratification measures were standard scored and composited to generate a more broadly based index of delay of gratification, and this index was correlated with the personality ratings available at the four ages. Boys who delayed gratification tended to be independently and consistently described as deliberative, attentive and able to concentrate, reasonable, reserved, cooperative, and generally manifesting an ability to modulate motivational and emotional impulse. Boys who did not delay gratification, by contrast, were irritable, restless and fidgety, aggressive, and generally not self-controlled. Xjirls who delayed gratification were independently and consistently described as intelligent, resourceful, and competent. Girls who did not delay tended to go to pieces under stress, to be victimized by other children, and to be easily offended, sulky, and whiny. These findings were interpreted in terms of the constructs of ego control and ego resiliency and the differential socialization of the sexes.

[1]  Jack Block,et al.  Lives Through Time , 1983 .

[2]  D. Buss,et al.  The cognitive style of breadth of categorization: Longitudinal consistency of personality correlates , 1981 .

[3]  J. Block,et al.  The Role of Ego-Control and Ego-Resiliency in the Organization of Behavior , 1980 .

[4]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time. , 1979 .

[5]  J. Block,et al.  Some Misgivings About the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a Measure of Reflection-Impulsivity. , 1974 .

[6]  W. Mischel Processes in Delay of Gratification , 1974 .

[7]  J. Block,et al.  Sex-role and socialization patterns: some personality concomitants and environmental antecedents. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  J. Block,et al.  Conceptions of sex role. Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. , 1973, The American psychologist.

[9]  R. Carlson,et al.  Sex differences in ego functioning: exploratory studies of agency and communion. , 1970, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  B. Thurston,et al.  The duality of human existence , 1966 .

[11]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The development of sex differences , 1966 .

[12]  W. Mischel,et al.  Theory and research on the antecedents of self-imposed delay of reward. , 1966, Progress in experimental personality research.

[13]  J. Block RECOGNIZING ATTENUATION EFFECTS IN THE STRATEGY OF RESEARCH. , 1964, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  B. Maher,et al.  Progress in experimental personality research , 1964 .

[15]  J. Block,et al.  IDENTIFICATION, EGO CONTROL, AND ADJUSTMENT. , 1963, Child development.

[16]  J. Block The equivalence of measures and the correction for attenuation. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Jack Block,et al.  The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research , 1964 .

[18]  J. Block,et al.  Predicting the behavior of children under frustration. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[19]  K. Lewin,et al.  Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[20]  Louis Guttman,et al.  A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability , 1945, Psychometrika.

[21]  K. Lewin,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Personality , 1936 .

[22]  C. Spearman CORRELATION CALCULATED FROM FAULTY DATA , 1910 .