Which Drug Prevents Tachycardia and Hypertension Associated With Tracheal Intubation: Lidocaine, Fentanyl, or Esmolol?

Eighty patients, ASA physical status II-IV, scheduled for noncardiac surgery, were randomly assigned in a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled manner to receive a preintubation dose of either placebo, 200 mg lidocaine, 200 pg fentanyl, or 150 mg esmolol. Induction of anesthesia was accomplished with 4–6 mg/kg thiopental IV followed immediately by the study drug; 1–1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine was given at minute I. Laryngoscopy and intubation were performed at minute 2 with anesthesia thereafter maintained with 1 MAC (±10%) isoflurane in 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen at a 5 L/min flow for 10 min. Heart rate was recorded every 15 s and blood pressure every minute from induction until 10 min after intubation. Maximum percent increases in heart rate (mean ± SE) during and after intubation were similar in the placebo (44% ± 6%), lidocaine (51% ± 10%), and fentanyl (37% ± 5%) groups, but lower in the esmolol (18% ± 5%) group (P<0.05). Maximum systolic blood pressure percent increases were lower in the lidocaine (20% ± 6%), fentanyl (12% ± 3%), and esmolol (19% ± 4%) groups than in the placebo (36% ± 5%) group (P<0.05), but not different from each other (P>0.05). Only esmolol provided consistent and reliable protection against increases in both heart rate and systolic blood pressure accompanying laryngoscopy and intubation.

[1]  A. Ivankovich,et al.  SINGLE DOSE ESMOLOL FOR PREVENTION OF HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES OF INTUBATION IN AN AMBULATORY SURGERY UNIT , 1989 .

[2]  F. Cervenko,et al.  Haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in geriatric patients: effects of fentanyl, lidocaine and thiopentone , 1989, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[3]  T. Vitez,et al.  Induction Using Fentanyl to Suppress the Intubation Response in the Cardiac Patient: What is the Optimal Dose? , 1988, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[4]  V. Baughman,et al.  Effects of Aerosolized and/or Intravenous Lidocaine on Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Outpatients , 1988, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  Effects of bolus injection of esmolol in healthy, exercising subjects , 1987, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[6]  S. McKenna Lack of effect of intravenous lidocaine on hemodynamic responses to rapid sequence induction of general anesthesia: A double-blind controlled clinical trial , 1987 .

[7]  F. Chung,et al.  Low-dose fentanyl: Haemodynamic response during induction and intubation in geriatric patients , 1985, Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal.

[8]  R. Bedford,et al.  Lidocaine before endotracheal intubation: intravenous or laryngotracheal? , 1981, Anesthesiology.

[9]  C. Jordan,et al.  Cardiovascular responses to anaesthesia , 1980, Anaesthesia.

[10]  R. Stoelting Circulatory changes during direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: influence of duration of laryngoscopy with or without prior lidocaine. , 1977, Anesthesiology.

[11]  J. D. Elder,et al.  REFLEX CIRCULATORY RESPONSES TO DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY AND TRACHEAL INTUBATION PERFORMED DURING GENERAL ANESTHESIA , 1951, Anesthesiology.