XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism and glioma risk: A meta-analysis involving 1439 cases and 2564 controls

Objectives: Previous reports indicated that XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism might be a possible risk factor for several cancers. Published studies on the association of XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphisms with glioma risk have yielded controversial results. The present study aimed to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. Methodology: Meta-analyses assessing the association of XRCC1 Arg280His variation with glioma were conducted and subgroup analyses on ethnicity and source of controls were further performed. Eligible studies for the period up to May 2012 were identified. Results: A total of four case-control studies comprising 1439 cases and 2564 controls were selected for analysis. The overall data indicated no significant association of XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism with glioma risk (His vs Arg: OR=1.05; 95%CI=0.88-1.25; His/His vs Arg/Arg: OR=1.42; 95%CI=0.87-2.29; dominant model: OR=1.00; 95%CI=0.82-1.22; recessive model: OR=1.41; 95%CI=0.88-2.25). Likewise, in the subgroup analysis regarding ethnicity and source of controls, no associations were observed. Conclusion: The results of the present study failed to suggest an association of XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism with glioma risk. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.

[1]  Guo-Min Li A special issue on DNA damage response and genome stability , 2012, Cell & Bioscience.

[2]  S. Rogatto,et al.  Genetic and modifying factors that determine the risk of brain tumors. , 2011, Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry.

[3]  K. Guyton,et al.  Polymorphism in the DNA repair enzyme XRCC1: utility of current database and implications for human health risk assessment. , 2011, Mutation research.

[4]  Yu Fan,et al.  Polymorphisms in DNA repair gene XRCC1 and increased genetic susceptibility to glioma. , 2011, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[5]  K. Huang,et al.  Polymorphisms of DNA repair gene XRCC1 and risk of glioma: a case-control study in Southern China. , 2011, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[6]  N. Rothman,et al.  DNA repair gene polymorphisms and risk of adult meningioma, glioma, and acoustic neuroma. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[7]  W. Curry,et al.  Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of brain tumors , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[8]  A. Auvinen,et al.  XRCC1 and XRCC3 variants and risk of glioma and meningioma , 2008, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[9]  Marcus R. Munafò,et al.  Assessing publication bias in genetic association studies: evidence from a recent meta-analysis , 2004, Psychiatry Research.

[10]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  C. Ulrich,et al.  Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[12]  S. Wallace,et al.  Base excision repair processing of radiation-induced clustered DNA lesions. , 2001, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  A. Tobías Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-anyalysis estimate , 1999 .

[14]  J P Vandenbroucke,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1998 .

[15]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[16]  A. Pompili Radiation-induced gliomas. , 1990, Journal of neurosurgery.