Dynamic Rule Mining for Argumentation Based Systems

Argumentation has proved to be a very influential reasoning mechanism particularly in the context of multi agent systems. In this paper we introduce PADUA (Protocol for Argumentation Dialogue Using Association Rules), a novel argumentation formalism that dynamically mines Association Rules (ARs) from the case background as a means to: (i) generate the arguments exchanged among dialogue participants, and (ii) represent each participant’s background domain knowledge, thus avoiding the traditional knowledge base representations. Dialogue participants mine ARs from their own case data and then use these rules as arguments and counter arguments. This paper fully describes the PADUA formalism and proposes a suite of dynamic ARM algorithms to provide support for the argumentation process.

[1]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Representing Epistemic Uncertainty by Means of Dialectical Argumentation , 2001, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[2]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases , 1993, SIGMOD Conference.

[3]  Amihood Amir,et al.  A New and Versatile Method for Association Generation , 1997, PKDD.

[4]  Simon Parsons,et al.  Agent Dialogues with Conflicting Preferences , 2001, ATAL.

[5]  E. Krabbe Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents , 2001 .

[6]  Jian Pei,et al.  Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation , 2000, SIGMOD 2000.

[7]  Catherine Blake,et al.  UCI Repository of machine learning databases , 1998 .

[8]  Henry Prakken,et al.  On Dialogue Systems with Speech Acts, Arguments, and Counterarguments , 2000, JELIA.

[9]  Frans Coenen,et al.  Tree Structures for Mining Association Rules , 2004, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[10]  Philip S. Yu Review - Mining Association Rules between Sets of Items in Large Databases , 1999, ACM SIGMOD Digit. Rev..

[11]  Simon Parsons,et al.  Argumentation-based dialogues for deliberation , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[12]  Jian Pei,et al.  Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation , 2000, SIGMOD '00.

[13]  Elizabeth Sklar,et al.  Towards the application of argumentation-based dialogues for education , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[14]  Christian Hidber,et al.  Association Rule Mining , 2017 .

[15]  Anja Oskamp,et al.  Information Technology & Lawyers: Advanced technology in the legal domain, from challenges to daily routine , 2006 .

[16]  D. Walton,et al.  Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning , 1995 .

[17]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Online generation of association rules , 1998, Proceedings 14th International Conference on Data Engineering.